Cargando…

The Fourth Amendment in flux : the Roberts court, crime control, and digital privacy /

"When the Founders penned the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, it was not difficult to identify the "persons, houses, papers, and effects" they meant to protect; nor was it hard to understand what "unreasonable searches and seizures" were. The Fourth Amendment was inten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autores principales: Gizzi, Michael C. (Autor), Curtis, R. Craig (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Lawrence, Kansas : University Press of Kansas, [2016]
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Ii 4500
001 JSTOR_ocn949989490
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|||||||||
008 160520t20162016ksu obv 001 0 eng d
040 |a IDEBK  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c IDEBK  |d P@U  |d OCLCO  |d TEFOD  |d OCLCF  |d YDXCP  |d JSTOR  |d OCLCQ  |d IOG  |d TFW  |d YDX  |d IAI  |d EBLCP  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d MM9  |d OCLCQ  |d UKAHL  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO 
019 |a 949866148  |a 966181512  |a 1021808277 
020 |a 0700622586  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 9780700622580  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 9780700622566  |q (hardback) 
020 |z 070062256X  |q (hardback) 
020 |z 9780700622573  |q (paperback) 
020 |z 0700622578  |q (paperback) 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000062516284 
035 |a (OCoLC)949989490  |z (OCoLC)949866148  |z (OCoLC)966181512  |z (OCoLC)1021808277 
037 |a 922432  |b MIL 
037 |a 5EDC1176-0322-4F54-BA9C-D2C5AFE36EDD  |b OverDrive, Inc.  |n http://www.overdrive.com 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 4 |a KF9630  |b .G59 2016 
072 7 |a LAW018000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL066000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL022000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 345.73/0522  |2 23 
084 |a LAW018000  |a POL022000  |2 bisacsh 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Gizzi, Michael C.,  |e author. 
245 1 4 |a The Fourth Amendment in flux :  |b the Roberts court, crime control, and digital privacy /  |c Michael C. Gizzi, R. Craig Curtis. 
264 1 |a Lawrence, Kansas :  |b University Press of Kansas,  |c [2016] 
264 4 |c ©2016 
300 |a 1 online resource 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 161-170) and index. 
505 0 |a Explaining the Roberts court's fourth amendment jurisprudence -- Setting the stage -- The Burger court and the rise of a jurisprudence of crime control -- The war on drugs and the triumph of the Rehnquist court -- The Roberts court in flux -- The jurisprudence of crime control on the Roberts court -- Reining in the excesses of crime control -- Toward the future. 
520 |a "When the Founders penned the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, it was not difficult to identify the "persons, houses, papers, and effects" they meant to protect; nor was it hard to understand what "unreasonable searches and seizures" were. The Fourth Amendment was intended to stop the use of general warrants and writs of assistance and applied primarily to protect the home. Flash forward to a time of digital devices, automobiles, the war on drugs, and a Supreme Court dominated by several decades of the jurisprudence of crime control, and the legal meaning of everything from "effects" to "seizures" has dramatically changed. Michael C. Gizzi and R. Craig Curtis make sense of these changes in The Fourth Amendment in Flux. The book traces the development and application of search and seizure law and jurisprudence over time, with particular emphasis on decisions of the Roberts Court. Cell phones, GPS tracking devices, drones, wiretaps, the Patriot Act, constantly changing technology, and a political culture that emphasizes crime control create new challenges for Fourth Amendment interpretation and jurisprudence. This work exposes the tensions caused by attempts to apply pretechnological legal doctrine to modern problems of digital privacy. In their analysis of the Roberts Court's relevant decisions, Gizzi and Curtis document the different approaches to the law that have been applied by the justices since the Obama nominees took their seats on the court. Their account, combining law, political science, and history, provides insight into the court's small group dynamics, and traces changes regarding search and seizure law in the opinions of one of its longest serving members, Justice Antonin Scalia. At a time when issues of privacy are increasingly complicated by technological advances, this overview and analysis of Fourth Amendment law is especially welcome--an invaluable resource as we address the enduring question of how to balance freedom against security in the context of the challenges of the twenty-first century"--  |c Provided by publisher. 
588 0 |a Online resource; title from PDF title page (JSTOR, viewed May 22, 2018). 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA) 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court. 
610 1 6 |a États-Unis.  |b Supreme Court. 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court  |2 fast 
650 0 |a Searches and seizures  |z United States  |v Cases. 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Constitutional.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Searches and seizures  |2 fast 
651 7 |a United States  |2 fast 
655 7 |a Trials, litigation, etc.  |2 fast 
700 1 |a Curtis, R. Craig,  |e author. 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Gizzi, Michael C.  |t Fourth Amendment in flux.  |d Lawrence, Kansas : University Press of Kansas, [2016]  |z 9780700622566  |w (DLC) 2016000656  |w (OCoLC)934432627 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/j.ctt1c2cqq6  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH39491530 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL5052672 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL5252482 
938 |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection  |b IDEB  |n cis33244563 
938 |a Project MUSE  |b MUSE  |n muse50812 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 12989132 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP