|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a2200000 i 4500 |
001 |
JSTOR_ocn919323558 |
003 |
OCoLC |
005 |
20231005004200.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr ||||||||||| |
008 |
150828t20152015caua ob i000 0 eng d |
040 |
|
|
|a AD#
|b eng
|e pn
|c AD#
|d OCLCO
|d DOS
|d NNY
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d YDXCP
|d JSTOR
|d OCLCO
|d COO
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d LND
|d VT2
|d VFL
|d LOA
|d ICG
|d U3W
|d OCLCF
|d ICN
|d CEF
|d OCLCQ
|d ERL
|d WYU
|d TXR
|d NJT
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|
019 |
|
|
|a 1008951392
|a 1066453679
|a 1115104112
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9780833093318
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|a 0833093312
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9780833088673
|
020 |
|
|
|z 083308867X
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a AU@
|b 000061155121
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a GBVCP
|b 1008664685
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)919323558
|z (OCoLC)1008951392
|z (OCoLC)1066453679
|z (OCoLC)1115104112
|
037 |
|
|
|a 22573/ctt19vr9df
|b JSTOR
|
043 |
|
|
|a n-us---
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a UA12
|b .P37 2015eb
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a POL012000
|2 bisacsh
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a POL021000
|2 bisacsh
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a BUS066000
|2 bisacsh
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a POL011000
|2 bisacsh
|
082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 355/.0320973
|2 23
|
049 |
|
|
|a UAMI
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Paul, Christopher,
|d 1971-
|e author.
|
245 |
1 |
2 |
|a A building partner capacity assessment framework :
|b tracking inputs, outputs, outcomes, disrupters, and workarounds /
|c Christopher Paul, Brain Gordon, Jennifer D.P. Moroney, Lisa Saum-Manning, Beth Grill, Colin P. Clarke, Heather Peterson.
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a Santa Monica :
|b Rand Corporation,
|c [2015]
|
264 |
|
4 |
|c ©2015
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (xxiii, 96 pages) :
|b illustrations
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
490 |
1 |
|
|a [Research report] ;
|v RR-935-OSD
|
500 |
|
|
|a "National Defense Research Institute."
|
500 |
|
|
|a "Prepared for the Joint Staff J5, the Office of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, and the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy"--Preface
|
504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references (pages 95-96).
|
505 |
0 |
0 |
|g Ch. 1:
|t Introduction --
|g ch. 2:
|t The BPC training and equipping logic model --
|g ch 3:
|t Description of logic model elements for the preengagement phase --
|g ch. 4:
|t Description of logic model elements for the engagement phase --
|g ch. 5:
|t Description of logic model elements for the postengagement phase, including outcomes --
|g ch. 6:
|t Using the BPC training and equipping logic model as part of an assessment framework.
|
505 |
0 |
0 |
|t Preface --
|t Figures and Tables --
|t Summary --
|t Acknowledgments --
|t Abbreviations --
|t Chapter One: Introduction:
|g Study Background and Companion Reports --
|g Methods and Approach --
|g Outline of the Remainder of the Report --
|t Chapter Two: The BPC Training and Equipping Logic Model:
|g Nested Logic Models --
|g Target High-Level Outcomes in the BPC Training and Equipping Logic Model --
|g Target Core Outputs of the Sequential Phases of the BPC Training and Equipping Logic Model --
|g Input Categories --
|g BPC Training and Equipping Logic Model Overview --
|t Chapter Three: Description of Logic Model Elements for the Preengagement Phase:
|g U.S. Program Goals and Plans: Preengagement --
|g U.S. Political Will: Preengagement --
|g Partner Nation Political Will: Preengagement --
|g Funding: Preengagement --
|g Partner Nation Personnel: Preengagement --
|g U.S. Trainers: Preengagement --
|g Equipment: Preengagement --
|g Logistics and Transport: Preengagement --
|g Facilities: Preengagement --
|g Curriculum and Training Content: Preengagement --
|t Chapter Four: Description of Logic Model Elements for the Engagement Phase:
|g U.S. Program Goals and Plans: During Engagement --
|g U.S. Political Will: During Engagement --
|g Partner Nation Political Will: During Engagement --
|g Funding: During Engagement --
|g Partner Nation Personnel: During Engagement --
|g U.S. Trainers: During Engagement --
|g Equipment: During Engagement --
|g Logistics and Transport: During Engagement --
|g Facilities: During Engagement --
|g Curriculum and Training Content: During Engagement --
|t Chapter Five: Description of Logic Model Elements for the Postengagement Phase, Including Outcomes:
|g U.S. Program Goals and Plans: Postengagement --
|g U.S. Program Goals and Plans: Outcomes --
|g U.S. Political Will: Postengagement --
|g U.S. Political Will: Outcomes --
|g Partner Nation Political Will: Postengagement --
|g Partner Nation Political Will: Outcomes --
|g Funding: Postengagement --
|g Funding: Outcomes --
|g Partner Nation Personnel: Postengagement --
|g Partner Nation Personnel: Outcomes --
|g U.S. Trainers: Postengagement --
|g U.S. Trainers: Outcomes --
|g Equipment: Postengagement --
|g Equipment: Outcomes --
|g Logistics and Transportation: Postengagement --
|g Logistics and Transportation: Outcomes --
|g Facilities: Postengagement --
|g Facilities: Outcomes --
|g Curriculum and Training Content: Postengagement --
|g Curriculum and Training Content: Outcomes --
|t Chapter Six: Using the BPC Training and Equipping Logic Model as Part of an Assessment Framework:
|g Three Questions, Three Places to Start --
|g Contextualizing the Logic Model --
|g The Logic Model Helps with Selection and Prioritization of Measures --
|t References.
|
588 |
0 |
|
|a Online resource; title from PDF title page (RAND, viewed August 28, 2015).
|
520 |
|
|
|a "For both diplomatic and national security reasons, security cooperation continues to be important for the United States. The Department of Defense conducts an assortment of programs aimed at building the capacity of partner nations, and training is an important element of these efforts. The needs and existing capabilities of various nations differ, however, as will results. Planning for each building partner capacity (BPC) effort carefully, assessing progress while the effort is in progress, and assessing results are all important to ensure that it meets U.S. goals and partner expectations. This report presents a framework intended to aid all these steps. Before execution, the framework can help determine and plan for what might go wrong with the intended BPC effort. During BPC execution, the framework can help monitor progress to discover whether everything is going according to plan and, if not, what is wrong and what can be done about it. Finally, the framework can help determine whether the BPC has achieved its objectives and, if not, why and what can be done about it in the future"--Publisher's description
|
590 |
|
|
|a JSTOR
|b Books at JSTOR Open Access
|
590 |
|
|
|a JSTOR
|b Books at JSTOR All Purchased
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Military assistance, American
|x Evaluation.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Military education
|x International cooperation
|x Evaluation.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Soldiers
|x Training of
|x International cooperation
|x Evaluation.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a National security
|x International cooperation
|x Evaluation.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Assistance militaire américaine
|x Évaluation.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a POLITICAL SCIENCE
|x Security (National & International)
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Military assistance, American
|x Evaluation
|2 fast
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a National Defense Research Institute (U.S.),
|e issuing body.
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a Rand Corporation,
|e issuing body.
|
776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version:Paul, Christopher, 1971-
|t Building partner capacity assessment framework.
|d Santa Monica : Rand Corporation, [2015]
|z 083308867X
|w (OCoLC)916721600
|
830 |
|
0 |
|a Research report (Rand Corporation) ;
|v RR-935-OSD.
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.7249/j.ctt19rmdt2
|z Texto completo
|
938 |
|
|
|a YBP Library Services
|b YANK
|n 12856735
|
994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b IZTAP
|