|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a2200000 i 4500 |
001 |
JSTOR_ocn908842066 |
003 |
OCoLC |
005 |
20231005004200.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr cnu---unuuu |
008 |
150513t20152015caubd ob 000 0 eng d |
040 |
|
|
|a JSTOR
|b eng
|e rda
|e pn
|c JSTOR
|d AD#
|d DOS
|d OCLCF
|d YDXCP
|d N$T
|d COO
|d LND
|d LOA
|d VFL
|d ICG
|d U3W
|d CEF
|d OCLCQ
|d ERL
|d WYU
|d NJT
|d OCL
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|
019 |
|
|
|a 909042891
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9780833089205
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|a 083308920X
|q (electronic bk.)
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a GBVCP
|b 100866359X
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)908842066
|z (OCoLC)909042891
|
037 |
|
|
|a 22573/ctt13x9v58
|b JSTOR
|
043 |
|
|
|a n-us---
|a a-ir---
|a e-ur---
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a UG743
|b .S26 2015eb
|
082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 358.1754
|2 23
|
049 |
|
|
|a UAMI
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Sankaran, Jaganath,
|e author.
|
245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The United States' European Phased Adaptive Approach missile defense system :
|b defending against Iranian threats without diluting the Russian deterrent /
|c by Jaganath Sankaran.
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a Santa Monica, Calif. :
|b Rand National Security Research Division,
|c [2015]
|
264 |
|
4 |
|c ©2015
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (xvii, 56 pages) :
|b color maps, color charts
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
490 |
1 |
|
|a Research reports ;
|v RR-957-TSF
|
500 |
|
|
|a "Supported by the Stanton Foundation."
|
504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references (pages 51-56).
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a 1. Origin and evolution of the European phased adaptive approach -- 2. The Iranian missile threat -- 3. The performance of EPAA against Iranian threats -- 4. The performance of EPAA against Russian ICBMs -- 5. Conclusion.
|
588 |
0 |
|
|a PDF (JSTOR, viewed May 13, 2015).
|
520 |
|
|
|a The United States developed the European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) missile defense system to defend against a variety of current and future Iranian missile threats. Russia has expressed dissatisfaction with the system, protesting that it presented a significant threat to Russia's nuclear deterrent. U.S. officials have repeatedly stated that the EPAA does not pose a threat to Russia's missile forces, arguing that the system is designed for ballistic missile threats from outside the Euro-Atlantic area and can neither negate nor undermine Russia's strategic deterrent capabilities. Nevertheless, in 2013, the Obama administration canceled Phase 4 of the system. This report demonstrates that the restructured EPAA system is able to defend against a range of current and future Iranian missile threats and does not pose a threat to Russian intercontinental ballistic missiles. Canceling Phase 4 of the EPAA system has opened a window for the United States and Russia to come together on additional bilateral nuclear arms reduction measures and missile defense cooperation.
|
590 |
|
|
|a JSTOR
|b Books at JSTOR All Purchased
|
590 |
|
|
|a JSTOR
|b Books at JSTOR Open Access
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Ballistic missile defenses
|z United States.
|
651 |
|
0 |
|a United States
|x Military policy.
|
651 |
|
0 |
|a United States
|x Foreign relations
|z Russia.
|
651 |
|
0 |
|a Russia
|x Foreign relations
|z United States.
|
651 |
|
0 |
|a United States
|x Foreign relations
|z Iran.
|
651 |
|
0 |
|a Iran
|x Foreign relations
|z United States.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Défense antimissile
|z États-Unis.
|
651 |
|
6 |
|a États-Unis
|x Relations extérieures
|z Russie.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Ballistic missile defenses
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Diplomatic relations
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Military policy
|2 fast
|
651 |
|
7 |
|a Iran
|2 fast
|
651 |
|
7 |
|a Russia
|2 fast
|
651 |
|
7 |
|a United States
|2 fast
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a Rand Corporation,
|e issuing body.
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a Stanton Foundation,
|e sponsoring body.
|
830 |
|
0 |
|a Research report (Rand Corporation) ;
|v RR-957-TSF.
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.7249/j.ctt14bs1nj
|z Texto completo
|
938 |
|
|
|a YBP Library Services
|b YANK
|n 12380788
|
994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b IZTAP
|