Cargando…

Reliable partners : how democracies have made a separate peace /

Democracies often go to war but almost never against each other. Indeed, "the democratic peace" has become a catchphrase among scholars and even U.S. Presidents. But why do democracies avoid fighting each other? Reliable Partners offers the first systematic and definitive explanation. Exam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Lipson, Charles
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Princeton, N.J. ; Oxford : Princeton University Press, 2003
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 JSTOR_ocn865508458
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 131217s2005 nju ob 001 0 eng d
040 |a N$T  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c N$T  |d JSTOR  |d OCLCF  |d DEBBG  |d OCLCQ  |d AGLDB  |d IOG  |d DEGRU  |d EZ9  |d OCLCQ  |d STF  |d VTS  |d REC  |d LVT  |d LEAUB  |d M8D  |d UKAHL  |d OCLCQ  |d AJS  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d LUU  |d INARC  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO 
019 |a 979727072  |a 992818916  |a 1058821816 
020 |a 9781400850723  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 140085072X  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 0691122776 
020 |z 9780691122779 
024 7 |a 10.1515/9781400850723  |2 doi 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000056681785 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV042523177 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV043028529 
029 1 |a DEBSZ  |b 434816175 
029 1 |a DEBSZ  |b 446454168 
029 1 |a GBVCP  |b 1003753884 
035 |a (OCoLC)865508458  |z (OCoLC)979727072  |z (OCoLC)992818916  |z (OCoLC)1058821816 
037 |a 22573/ctt4k7737  |b JSTOR 
050 4 |a JC423  |b .L583 2005eb 
072 7 |a POL  |x 040020  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL  |x 011000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL007000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL034000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL011000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 327.17  |2 22 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Lipson, Charles. 
245 1 0 |a Reliable partners :  |b how democracies have made a separate peace /  |c Charles Lipson. 
264 1 |a Princeton, N.J. ;  |a Oxford :  |b Princeton University Press,  |c 2003 
300 |a 1 online resource (259 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file 
347 |b PDF 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
505 0 |a The argument in a nutshell -- Is there really peace among democracies? -- A contracting theory of the democratic peace and its alternatives -- Why democratic bargains are reliable : constitutions, open politics, and the electorate -- Leadership succession as a cause of war : the structural advantage of democracies -- Extending the argument : implications of secure contracting among constitutional democracies -- Conclusion: reliable partners and reliable peace. 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
520 |a Democracies often go to war but almost never against each other. Indeed, "the democratic peace" has become a catchphrase among scholars and even U.S. Presidents. But why do democracies avoid fighting each other? Reliable Partners offers the first systematic and definitive explanation. Examining decades of research and speculation on the subject and testing this against the history of relations between democracies over the last two centuries, Charles Lipson concludes that constitutional democracies have a "contracting advantage"--A unique ability to settle conflicts with each other by durable agreements. In so doing he forcefully counters realist claims that a regime's character is irrelevant to war and peace. Lipson argues that because democracies are confident their bargains will stick, they can negotiate effective settlements with each other rather than incur the great costs of war. Why are democracies more reliable partners? Because their politics are uniquely open to outside scrutiny and facilitate long-term commitments. They cannot easily bluff, deceive, or launch surprise attacks. While this transparency weakens their bargaining position, it also makes their promises more credible--and more durable, for democracies are generally stable. Their leaders are constrained by constitutional rules, independent officials, and the political costs of abandoning public commitments. All this allows for solid bargains between democracies. When democracies contemplate breaking their agreements, their open debate gives partners advance notice and a chance to protect themselves. Hence agreements among democracies are less risky than those with nondemocratic states. Setting rigorous analysis in friendly, vigorous prose, Reliable Partners resolves longstanding questions about the democratic peace and highlights important new findings about democracies in world politics, from rivalries to alliances. Above all, it shows conclusively that democracies are uniquely adapted to seal enduring bargains with each other and thus avoid the blight of war 
546 |a In English. 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA) 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Evidence Based Acquisitions 
650 0 |a Democracy. 
650 0 |a Peace. 
650 6 |a Paix. 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Government  |x International.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x International Relations  |x General.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Political Ideologies  |x Democracy.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Democracy  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Peace  |2 fast 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Lipson, Charles.  |t Reliable partners  |z 0691122776  |w (OCoLC)60319272 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/j.ctt5hhr88  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH28074036 
938 |a De Gruyter  |b DEGR  |n 9781400850723 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 660175 
938 |a Internet Archive  |b INAR  |n reliablepartners0000lips_u9r3 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP