|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a2200000 i 4500 |
001 |
JSTOR_ocn857363929 |
003 |
OCoLC |
005 |
20231005004200.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr ||||||||||| |
008 |
130901s2013 caua obt 000 0 eng d |
040 |
|
|
|a DID
|b eng
|e rda
|e pn
|c DID
|d KLG
|d COO
|d JSTOR
|d OCLCF
|d OCLCA
|d YDXCP
|d OCLCQ
|d CUS
|d VT2
|d LND
|d LOA
|d ICG
|d U3W
|d CEF
|d AU@
|d ERL
|d ICN
|d WYU
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d NJT
|d HS0
|d OCLCA
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|
019 |
|
|
|a 1008949237
|a 1058384447
|a 1066677820
|a 1115063874
|a 1162546515
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9780833083395
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|a 0833083392
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|z 0833081330
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9780833081339
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a AU@
|b 000061153783
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a GBVCP
|b 1008659258
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)857363929
|z (OCoLC)1008949237
|z (OCoLC)1058384447
|z (OCoLC)1066677820
|z (OCoLC)1115063874
|z (OCoLC)1162546515
|
037 |
|
|
|a 22573/ctt4cxk08
|b JSTOR
|
043 |
|
|
|a n-us---
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a UC263
|b .C636 2013
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a TEC025000
|2 bisacsh
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a HIS027000
|2 bisacsh
|
082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 355.6/212
|2 23
|
088 |
|
|
|a RAND RR237
|
049 |
|
|
|a UAMI
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Connor, Kathryn.
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a New approaches to defense inflation and discounting /
|c Kathryn Connor, James Dryden.
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a Santa Monica, CA :
|b RAND,
|c 2013.
|
264 |
|
4 |
|c Ã2013
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (xix, 42 pages) :
|b illustrations
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
347 |
|
|
|a text file
|
347 |
|
|
|b PDF
|
490 |
1 |
|
|a RAND Corporation research report series ;
|v RR237
|
504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references (pages 41-42).
|
520 |
|
|
|a Inflation indices and discount rates are necessary tools in the Department of Defense's acquisition process, as the final selection of a system is partially based on potential increases in sustainment costs (inflation) and the present value of future costs (discounting). Inflation indices built for DoD use very broad categories that include operations and maintenance (O & M) as well as manpower, procurement, and research and development. This study addresses the question of how well current inflation indices and discount rates are serving DoD weaponsystem program management. It investigates inflation rates for parts for the Abrams tank and the Bradley armored personnel carrier and shows that the two weapon systems, while both ground systems, experience inflation differently. Although government decisionmaking can benefit from discounting (taking into account the time value of money), choices made using discounted cash flows are not always the least expensive for DoD. Its O & M estimating strategies should be reviewed to reflect changing repair and other costs, since a range of reasonable courses of action exists for many DoD investment decisions. Recommendations for the Office of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation to consider when evaluating the inflation and discounting policies that impact the long-term affordability of DoD programs include (1) revisiting O & M costs annually with a 5-year moving-average inflation, to reflect changing repair and other costs; (2) highlighting the role of supply chain surcharges in parts costs in cost estimates used to inform program financial analysis; (3) expanding analysis of investments to ensure consideration of least-cost outcomes.
|
588 |
0 |
|
|a Online resource; title from PDF title page (RAND, viewed September 1, 2013).
|
536 |
|
|
|a The research described in this report was prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) ... under Contract W74V8H-06-0002.
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Introduction -- Cost Inflation of Ground-Vehicle Parts -- The Value of Discounting -- New Approaches to Inflation and Discounting -- Appendix: Inflation Estimates over Time.
|
546 |
|
|
|a English.
|
590 |
|
|
|a JSTOR
|b Books at JSTOR All Purchased
|
590 |
|
|
|a JSTOR
|b Books at JSTOR Open Access
|
610 |
1 |
0 |
|a United States.
|b Department of Defense
|x Appropriations and expenditures
|x Effect of inflation on.
|
610 |
1 |
7 |
|a United States.
|b Department of Defense
|2 fast
|
651 |
|
0 |
|a United States
|x Armed Forces
|x Weapons systems
|x Costs.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING
|x Military Science.
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Armed Forces
|x Weapons systems
|x Costs
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Expenditures, Public
|2 fast
|
651 |
|
7 |
|a United States
|2 fast
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Dryden, James.
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a National Defense Research Institute (U.S.)
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a Rand Corporation,
|e publisher.
|
776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version:
|a Connor, Kathryn.
|t New approaches to defense inflation and discounting.
|d Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2013
|w (DLC) 2013032025
|
830 |
|
0 |
|a RAND Corporation research report series ;
|v RR237.
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.7249/j.ctt5hhsk2
|z Texto completo
|
938 |
|
|
|a YBP Library Services
|b YANK
|n 11820988
|
994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b IZTAP
|