Cargando…

Using EPIC to find conflicts, inconsistencies, and gaps in Department of Defense policies /

The authors present a framework and methodology to identify the roles and responsibilities (R & R) of those implementing Department of Defense policies and also potential conflicts, ambiguities, gaps, inconsistencies, and redundancies in those policies. They introduce a new software tool that au...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autores principales: Wong, Carolyn, 1952- (Autor), Gonzales, Daniel, 1956- (Autor), Ohlandt, Chad J. R. (Autor), Landree, Eric (Autor), Hollywood, John S., 1973- (Autor)
Autores Corporativos: Acquisition and Technology Policy Center, Rand Corporation, United States. Navy
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2013.
Colección:Technical report Using EPIC to find conflicts, inconsistencies, and gaps in Department of Defense policies
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Ii 4500
001 JSTOR_ocn852863363
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr un||||uuuuu
008 130716s2013 caua ob 000 0 eng d
040 |a GZW  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c GZW  |d GZW  |d JSTOR  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCA  |d YDXCP  |d OCLCA  |d OCLCQ  |d TEF  |d OCLCA  |d CUS  |d LND  |d NJR  |d LOA  |d VFL  |d OCLCQ  |d ICG  |d OCLCA  |d OCLCF  |d U3W  |d ICN  |d CEF  |d AU@  |d ERL  |d WYU  |d LVT  |d TXR  |d NJT  |d OCLCA  |d VT2  |d EQF  |d UWK  |d SXB  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCA  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d YWS  |d OCLCQ 
019 |a 857922930  |a 1044527822  |a 1058386267  |a 1066598126  |a 1129348460  |a 1162544747  |a 1165842999  |a 1166210366  |a 1166247961  |a 1171413301 
020 |a 9780833081926  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 0833081926  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 9780833076762 
020 |z 0833076760 
027 |a RAND/TR-1277-NAVY 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000061155142 
029 1 |a GBVCP  |b 1008659045 
035 |a (OCoLC)852863363  |z (OCoLC)857922930  |z (OCoLC)1044527822  |z (OCoLC)1058386267  |z (OCoLC)1066598126  |z (OCoLC)1129348460  |z (OCoLC)1162544747  |z (OCoLC)1165842999  |z (OCoLC)1166210366  |z (OCoLC)1166247961  |z (OCoLC)1171413301 
037 |a 22573/ctt4bmv0r  |b JSTOR 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 4 |a UB193  |b .U85 2013 
072 7 |a POL035000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a TEC025000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a COM000000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 355.61  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
245 0 0 |a Using EPIC to find conflicts, inconsistencies, and gaps in Department of Defense policies /  |c Carolyn Wong, Daniel Gonzales, Chad J.R. Ohlandt, Eric Landree, John Hollywood. 
264 1 |a Santa Monica, CA :  |b RAND,  |c 2013. 
300 |a 1 online resource (xxii, 63 pages) :  |b color illustrations 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file 
347 |b PDF 
490 0 |a Technical report Using EPIC to find conflicts, inconsistencies, and gaps in Department of Defense policies 
500 |a "RAND National Defense Research Institute." 
500 |a "This research was conducted within the Acquisition and Technology Policy Center (ATPC) of RAND National Defense Research Institute"--Preface 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 61-63). 
505 0 |a Introduction -- The R & R policy analysis framework and methodology --The EPIC tool -- The program manager case study -- The interoperability and standards case Study -- The information assurance case study -- Closing remarks and recommendations -- Appendix: EPIC. 
520 |a The authors present a framework and methodology to identify the roles and responsibilities (R & R) of those implementing Department of Defense policies and also potential conflicts, ambiguities, gaps, inconsistencies, and redundancies in those policies. They introduce a new software tool that automates one step of the methodology-EPIC-and demonstrate its use with three case studies to illustrate the technique and also the tool's flexibility. EPIC allows analysts to efficiently analyze multiple policy documents to detect potential conflicts in policy early on, thereby allowing policy developers to focus their attention on the need for clarification and, possibly, changes in policy. The authors relate executive positions to R & R and the products that result from their execution. If it can be shown that more than one actor is assigned to take the same action on the same product, then a potential conflict exists in the body of policy. If, on the other hand, no executive is assigned to take action on a product, then there is a potential gap in the body of policy. Use of this new tool will result in better and more consistent defense policy. 
546 |a English. 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Open Access 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Department of Defense  |x Personnel management  |x Data processing. 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Department of Defense  |x Officials and employees  |x Selection and appointment. 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Department of Defense.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01852447 
650 0 |a Manpower  |z United States. 
650 6 |a Main-d'œuvre  |z États-Unis. 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Political Freedom.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Manpower.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01007872 
650 7 |a Personnel management  |x Data processing.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01058809 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
700 1 |a Wong, Carolyn,  |d 1952-  |e author. 
700 1 |a Gonzales, Daniel,  |d 1956-  |e author. 
700 1 |a Ohlandt, Chad J. R.,  |e author. 
700 1 |a Landree, Eric,  |e author. 
700 1 |a Hollywood, John S.,  |d 1973-  |e author. 
710 2 |a Acquisition and Technology Policy Center. 
710 2 |a Rand Corporation. 
710 1 |a United States.  |b Navy. 
776 1 |z 9780833076762 
776 1 |z 0833076760 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.7249/j.ctt4cgdw6  |z Texto completo 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 11820932 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP