Cargando…

The puzzle of unanimity : consensus on the United States Supreme Court /

The U.S. Supreme Court typically rules on cases that present complex legal questions. Given the challenging nature of its cases and the popular view that the Court is divided along ideological lines, it's commonly assumed that the Court routinely hands down equally-divided decisions. Yet the ju...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autores principales: Corley, Pamela C., 1967- (Autor), Steigerwalt, Amy, 1976- (Autor), Ward, Artemus, 1971- (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Stanford, California : Stanford Law Books, [2013]
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Mi 4500
001 JSTOR_ocn841909856
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|||||||||
008 130506t20132013cau ob 001 0 eng d
010 |z  2012049306 
040 |a YDXCP  |b eng  |e pn  |c YDXCP  |d OCLCO  |d MHW  |d E7B  |d DEBSZ  |d N$T  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCF  |d NLGGC  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCA  |d OCLCQ  |d AZK  |d LOA  |d STBDS  |d AGLDB  |d MOR  |d PIFAG  |d ZCU  |d MERUC  |d OCLCQ  |d U3W  |d STF  |d WRM  |d VTS  |d NRAMU  |d ICG  |d INT  |d VT2  |d AU@  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d WYU  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d LEAUB  |d DKC  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d JSTOR  |d UKCRE  |d BOL  |d VLY  |d AJS  |d SFB  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d GXR  |d OCLCO 
019 |a 961671463  |a 962591247  |a 965981229  |a 988437387  |a 992114248  |a 1037789625  |a 1038617961  |a 1045476040  |a 1055386222  |a 1058060154  |a 1065717950  |a 1081269866  |a 1114444726  |a 1153510434  |a 1162185369  |a 1241805783  |a 1290104949  |a 1300543231 
020 |a 0804786321  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 9780804786324  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 9780804784726  |q (cloth ;  |q alk. paper) 
020 |z 0804784728  |q (cloth ;  |q alk. paper) 
024 7 |a 10.1515/9780804786324  |2 doi 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000053308763 
029 1 |a CHNEW  |b 000618038 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV043040123 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV044189167 
029 1 |a DEBSZ  |b 397534507 
029 1 |a DEBSZ  |b 421216433 
029 1 |a NZ1  |b 15588170 
029 1 |a CHVBK  |b 567703800 
029 1 |a CHNEW  |b 001051560 
035 |a (OCoLC)841909856  |z (OCoLC)961671463  |z (OCoLC)962591247  |z (OCoLC)965981229  |z (OCoLC)988437387  |z (OCoLC)992114248  |z (OCoLC)1037789625  |z (OCoLC)1038617961  |z (OCoLC)1045476040  |z (OCoLC)1055386222  |z (OCoLC)1058060154  |z (OCoLC)1065717950  |z (OCoLC)1081269866  |z (OCoLC)1114444726  |z (OCoLC)1153510434  |z (OCoLC)1162185369  |z (OCoLC)1241805783  |z (OCoLC)1290104949  |z (OCoLC)1300543231 
037 |a 22573/ctvqrmhs3  |b JSTOR 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 4 |a KF8742  |b .C69 2013 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 012000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 062000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL  |x 040030  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 025000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 347.73/26  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Corley, Pamela C.,  |d 1967-  |e author. 
245 1 4 |a The puzzle of unanimity :  |b consensus on the United States Supreme Court /  |c Pamela C. Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, and Artemus Ward. 
264 1 |a Stanford, California :  |b Stanford Law Books,  |c [2013] 
264 4 |c ©2013 
300 |a 1 online resource (x, 201 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
340 |g polychrome.  |2 rdacc  |0 http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAColourContent/1003 
347 |a text file  |2 rdaft  |0 http://rdaregistry.info/termList/fileType/1002 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
505 0 |a The Roosevelt court : the critical juncture from consensus to dissensus -- Closing the jaws of the decision-making vise : a theory and model of consensus -- A function of design : consensus in votes on the merits -- Monolithic solidarity : consensus in opinion writing -- An opportunity to clarify : unanimity and agenda setting. 
520 |a The U.S. Supreme Court typically rules on cases that present complex legal questions. Given the challenging nature of its cases and the popular view that the Court is divided along ideological lines, it's commonly assumed that the Court routinely hands down equally-divided decisions. Yet the justices actually issue unanimous decisions in approximately one third of the cases they decide. Drawing on data from the U.S. Supreme Court database, internal court documents, and the justices' private papers, The Puzzle of Unanimity provides the first comprehensive account of how the C. 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
546 |a English. 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA) 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court. 
610 1 6 |a États-Unis.  |b Supreme Court. 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court  |2 fast 
650 0 |a Judicial process  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Consensus (Social sciences)  |z United States. 
650 6 |a Processus judiciaire  |z États-Unis. 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Civil Procedure.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Legal Services.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Government  |x Judicial Branch.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW / Courts  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Consensus (Social sciences)  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Judicial process  |2 fast 
651 7 |a United States  |2 fast 
650 7 |a United States of America, USA.  |2 thema 
650 7 |a Laws of specific jurisdictions & specific areas of law.  |2 thema 
650 7 |a Legal systems: courts & procedure.  |2 thema 
650 7 |a Law.  |2 ukslc 
700 1 |a Steigerwalt, Amy,  |d 1976-  |e author. 
700 1 |a Ward, Artemus,  |d 1971-  |e author. 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |z 9780804784726  |z 0804784728  |w (DLC) 2012049306 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/j.ctvqsdtf6  |z Texto completo 
938 |a ebrary  |b EBRY  |n ebr10692205 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 713591 
938 |a Oxford University Press USA  |b OUPR  |n EDZ0000155773 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 10685509 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP