|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a2200000 a 4500 |
001 |
JSTOR_ocn819409949 |
003 |
OCoLC |
005 |
20231005004200.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr mn||||a|||| |
008 |
121127s2012 caua obt 000 0 eng |
040 |
|
|
|a DID
|b eng
|e pn
|c DID
|d DID
|d OCLCA
|d JSTOR
|d COO
|d YDXCP
|d OCLCQ
|d CUS
|d OCLCQ
|d LND
|d VT2
|d VFL
|d LOA
|d ICG
|d OCLCA
|d OCLCF
|d U3W
|d ICN
|d CEF
|d AU@
|d ERL
|d WYU
|d TXR
|d NJT
|d VLY
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|
019 |
|
|
|a 1008953830
|a 1044574240
|a 1058473388
|a 1060955317
|a 1066615298
|a 1073054745
|a 1115108888
|a 1162365687
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9780833083494
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|a 083308349X
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9780833059673
|
020 |
|
|
|z 083305967X
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a AU@
|b 000061153509
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a GBVCP
|b 100865793X
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)819409949
|z (OCoLC)1008953830
|z (OCoLC)1044574240
|z (OCoLC)1058473388
|z (OCoLC)1060955317
|z (OCoLC)1066615298
|z (OCoLC)1073054745
|z (OCoLC)1115108888
|z (OCoLC)1162365687
|
037 |
|
|
|a 22573/ctt4cxzb1
|b JSTOR
|
043 |
|
|
|a n-us---
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a UG633.2
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a TEC025000
|2 bisacsh
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a SCI043000
|2 bisacsh
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a HIS027000
|2 bisacsh
|
082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 358.4/18
|2 23
|
088 |
|
|
|a RAND TR905
|
049 |
|
|
|a UAMI
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Improving Air Force depot programming by linking resources to capabilities /
|c Don Snyder [and others].
|
260 |
|
|
|a Santa Monica, CA :
|b RAND,
|c 2012.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (xix, 86 pages) :
|b illustrations
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
347 |
|
|
|a text file
|
347 |
|
|
|b PDF
|
490 |
1 |
|
|a RAND Corporation technical report series ;
|v TR905
|
504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references (pages 85-86).
|
520 |
|
|
|a One of the more challenging goals in programming is to link Air Force budget program element investments to operationally relevant capability metrics, then to use these metrics to assess any risk incurred by a proposed program objective memorandum (POM). Previous RAND Project AIR FORCE work developed a set of metrics and framework of analysis for capabilities-based programming and assessment of risks of expeditionary combat support. Because of the success of that work, the RAND Corporation was asked to apply and to extend (as needed) this capabilities based approach to the depot maintenance business areas, specifically focusing on depot purchased equipment maintenance (DPEM) as a first step, and to do so with a methodology that is broadly applicable. DPEM comprises numerous depot-level maintenance and inspection activities on capital assets, as well as storage and other supporting activities that span numerous program elements, budget programs, and appropriations. It funds the bulk of the work done at the Air Force depots that does not involve the repair of spares or the work on modification programs. This report presents an analysis of how to better program for DPEM.
|
536 |
|
|
|a The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract FA7014-06-C-0001.
|
588 |
0 |
|
|a Online resource; title from PDF title screen (viewed on November 27, 2012).
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Introduction -- Depot purchased equipment maintenance -- Metrics for assessing capabilities and risks in depot purchased equipment maintenance -- Enterprise prioritization in depot purchased equipment maintenance funding -- A prototype model for assessing capabilities and risks in depot purchased equipment maintenance programming -- Software maintenance challenges for capabilities-based programming -- Policy options and conclusions -- Appendix A. Aircraft possession purpose codes -- Appendix B. Decision support system description -- Appendix C. Software Deferrals -- Appendix D. The software requirements and execution process.
|
546 |
|
|
|a English.
|
590 |
|
|
|a JSTOR
|b Books at JSTOR All Purchased
|
590 |
|
|
|a JSTOR
|b Books at JSTOR Open Access
|
610 |
1 |
0 |
|a United States.
|b Air Force
|x Appropriations and expenditures.
|
610 |
1 |
0 |
|a United States.
|b Air Force
|x Equipment
|x Maintenance and repair
|x Costs
|x Evaluation.
|
610 |
1 |
0 |
|a United States.
|b Air Force
|x Supplies and stores
|x Costs
|x Evaluation.
|
610 |
1 |
6 |
|a États-Unis.
|b Air Force
|x Crédits budgétaires et dépenses.
|
610 |
1 |
6 |
|a États-Unis.
|b Air Force
|x Équipement
|x Entretien et réparations
|x Coût.
|
610 |
1 |
7 |
|a United States.
|b Air Force
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING
|x Military Science.
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Armed Forces
|x Appropriations and expenditures
|2 fast
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Snyder, Don,
|d 1962-
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a Project Air Force (U.S.)
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a Rand Corporation.
|
776 |
0 |
|
|z 083305967X
|
830 |
|
0 |
|a Technical report (Rand Corporation) ;
|v TR905.
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.7249/j.ctt5hhw7k
|z Texto completo
|
938 |
|
|
|a YBP Library Services
|b YANK
|n 11820997
|
994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b IZTAP
|