Cargando…

The vulnerability thesis : interest group influence and institutional design /

Where politics is dominated by two large parties, as in the United States, politicians should be relatively immune to the influence of small groups. Yet narrow interest groups often win private benefits against majority preferences and at great public expense. Why? The "vulnerability thesis&quo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Moosbrugger, Lorelei K. (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: New Haven : Yale University Press, [2012]
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Ia 4500
001 JSTOR_ocn801411247
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr cn|||||||||
008 120723t20122012ctu ob 001 0 eng d
040 |a N$T  |b eng  |e pn  |c N$T  |d E7B  |d YDXCP  |d OCLCQ  |d CDX  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCF  |d JSTOR  |d IDEBK  |d COO  |d OCLCQ  |d EBLCP  |d OCLCQ  |d DEBSZ  |d WAU  |d OCLCQ  |d LOA  |d AZK  |d COCUF  |d AGLDB  |d MOR  |d PIFAG  |d OTZ  |d ZCU  |d OCLCQ  |d MERUC  |d OCLCQ  |d IOG  |d U3W  |d EZ9  |d DEGRU  |d STF  |d WRM  |d VNS  |d VTS  |d NRAMU  |d ICG  |d VT2  |d OCLCQ  |d WYU  |d LVT  |d TKN  |d DKC  |d OCLCQ  |d M8D  |d OCLCQ  |d MM9  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d VI#  |d INARC 
019 |a 828617182  |a 923598529  |a 961613351  |a 962666474 
020 |a 9780300167580  |q (electronic book) 
020 |a 030016758X  |q (electronic book) 
020 |z 9780300166798  |q (paper) 
020 |z 0300166796  |q (paper) 
020 |z 9781280770531 
020 |z 1280770538 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000054144030 
029 1 |a CHNEW  |b 000600872 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV041561522 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV043091684 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV044116749 
029 1 |a DEBSZ  |b 424592150 
029 1 |a DEBSZ  |b 452598494 
029 1 |a GBVCP  |b 1003706800 
029 1 |a NZ1  |b 16078008 
035 |a (OCoLC)801411247  |z (OCoLC)828617182  |z (OCoLC)923598529  |z (OCoLC)961613351  |z (OCoLC)962666474 
037 |a 368130  |b MIL 
037 |a 22573/ctt5q78x4  |b JSTOR 
050 4 |a JF529  |b .M66 2012eb 
072 7 |a POL  |x 043000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a BUS079000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL015000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL043000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 322.4/3  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Moosbrugger, Lorelei K.,  |e author. 
245 1 4 |a The vulnerability thesis :  |b interest group influence and institutional design /  |c Lorelei K. Moosbrugger. 
264 1 |a New Haven :  |b Yale University Press,  |c [2012] 
264 4 |c ©2012 
300 |a 1 online resource (xii, 193 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |2 rdaft 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 169-183) and index. 
505 0 |a Interest group influence and institutional design -- The vulnerability thesis -- Evidence from the environment -- The European Union -- The United Kingdom: minority influence and majority rule -- Germany: the politics of paying the polluter -- Austria: political cover and policy choice -- Sweden: minority representation and the majority interest -- Institutional design and the quality of democracy. 
520 |a Where politics is dominated by two large parties, as in the United States, politicians should be relatively immune to the influence of small groups. Yet narrow interest groups often win private benefits against majority preferences and at great public expense. Why? The "vulnerability thesis" is that the electoral system is largely to blame, making politicians in two-party systems more vulnerable to interest group demands than politicians in multiparty systems. Political scientist Lorelei Moosbrugger ranks democracies on a continuum of political vulnerability and tests the thesis by examining agrochemical policy in Austria, Britain, Germany, Sweden, and the European Union. 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Evidence Based Acquisitions 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA) 
650 0 |a Pressure groups. 
650 0 |a Majorities. 
650 0 |a Representative government and representation. 
650 0 |a Pressure groups  |v Case studies. 
650 0 |a Majorities  |v Case studies. 
650 0 |a Representative government and representation  |v Case studies. 
650 6 |a Groupes de pression. 
650 6 |a Majorité (Droit constitutionnel) 
650 6 |a Gouvernement représentatif. 
650 6 |a Groupes de pression  |v Études de cas. 
650 6 |a Majorité (Droit constitutionnel)  |v Études de cas. 
650 6 |a Gouvernement représentatif  |v Études de cas. 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Political Process  |x Political Advocacy.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a BUSINESS & ECONOMICS  |x Government & Business.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Majorities.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01006241 
650 7 |a Pressure groups.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01075954 
650 7 |a Representative government and representation.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01094941 
655 7 |a Case studies.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01423765 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Moosbrugger, Lorelei K.  |t Vulnerability thesis.  |d New Haven : Yale University Press, ©2012  |z 9780300166798  |w (DLC) 2011046003  |w (OCoLC)759174375 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/j.ctt5vm6mz  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Internet Archive  |b INAR  |n vulnerabilitythe0000moos 
938 |a Coutts Information Services  |b COUT  |n 23989714 
938 |a De Gruyter  |b DEGR  |n 9780300167580 
938 |a EBL - Ebook Library  |b EBLB  |n EBL3420874 
938 |a ebrary  |b EBRY  |n ebr10571000 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 462899 
938 |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection  |b IDEB  |n cis23989714 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 8872186 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP