Cargando…

Political Questions Judicial Answers : Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs?.

Almost since the beginning of the republic, America's rigorous separation of powers among Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches has been umpired by the federal judiciary. It may seem surprising, then, that many otherwise ordinary cases are not decided in court even when they include all...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Franck, Thomas M.
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2012.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Mi 4500
001 JSTOR_ocn794663579
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr unu||||||||
008 121121s2012 nju o 000 0 eng d
040 |a EBLCP  |b eng  |e pn  |c EBLCP  |d OCLCQ  |d EDX  |d JSTOR  |d DEBSZ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCQ  |d ZCU  |d MERUC  |d IOG  |d EZ9  |d ICG  |d TXC  |d OCLCQ  |d LVT  |d DKC  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO 
020 |a 9781400820733  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 1400820731  |q (electronic bk.) 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000052904373 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV044165429 
029 1 |a DEBSZ  |b 39731230X 
029 1 |a GBVCP  |b 100369960X 
035 |a (OCoLC)794663579 
037 |a 22573/ctt42gcs  |b JSTOR 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 4 |a KF4651 .F73 
072 7 |a LAW060000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 342.73/044  |a 342.73044  |a 347.30244 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Franck, Thomas M. 
245 1 0 |a Political Questions Judicial Answers :  |b Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs?. 
260 |a Princeton :  |b Princeton University Press,  |c 2012. 
300 |a 1 online resource (209 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a data file  |2 rda 
505 0 |a Cover; Title; Copyright; Contents; Acknowledgments; Chapter One: Introduction; Chapter Two: How Abdication Crept into the Judicial Repertory; The Faustian Pact; Double-Entry Bookkeeping; Chapter Three: Two Principled Theories of Constitutionalism; Chapter Four: Prudential Reasons for Judicial Abdication; The Factual Evidence Is Too Difficult; No Applicable Legal Standards; Too Much at Stake; Judges Cannot Compel the Executive; Chapter Five: When Judges Refuse to Abdicate; Security and Foreign-Policy Interests v. Property Rights; Security and Foreign-Policy Interests v. Civil Rights. 
505 8 |a Congressional v. Executive PowersChapter Six: Mandated Adjudication: Act of State and Sovereign Immunity; Act of State; Foreign Sovereign Immunity; Chapter Seven: Abolishing Judicial Abdication: The German Model; German Judges on Whether to Decide; German Judges on How to Decide; Chapter Eight: A Rule of Evidence in Place of the Political-Question Doctrine; Evidentiary Weight; Chapter Nine: The Special Cases: In Camera Proceedings and Declaratory Judgments; The Need to Preserve Secrecy; The Less Confrontational Remedy: Declaratory Judgment. 
505 8 |a Chapter Ten: Conclusions: Does the Rule of Law Stop at the Water's Edge?Notes; Index. 
520 |a Almost since the beginning of the republic, America's rigorous separation of powers among Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches has been umpired by the federal judiciary. It may seem surprising, then, that many otherwise ordinary cases are not decided in court even when they include allegations that the President, or Congress, has violated a law or the Constitution itself. Most of these orphan cases are shunned by the judiciary simply because they have foreign policy aspects. In refusing to address the issues involved, judges indicate that judicial review, like politics, should stop at the water's edge--and foreign policy managers find it convenient to agree! Thomas Franck, however, maintains that when courts invoke the "political question" doctrine to justify such reticence, they evade a constitutional duty. In his view, whether the government has acted constitutionally in sending men and women to die in foreign battles is just as appropriate an issue for a court to decide as whether property has been taken without due process. In this revisionist work, Franck proposes ways to subject the conduct of foreign policy to the rule of law without compromising either judicial integrity or the national interest. By examining the historical origins of the separation of powers in the American constitutional tradition, with comparative reference to the practices of judiciaries in other federal systems, he broadens and enriches discussions of an important national issue that has particular significance for critical debate about the "imperial presidency." 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA) 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Evidence Based Acquisitions 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
650 0 |a Courts  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Judicial review  |z United States. 
650 0 |a National security  |x Law and legislation  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Political questions and judicial power  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Separation of powers  |z United States. 
651 0 |a United States  |x Foreign relations. 
650 6 |a Contrôle juridictionnel des lois  |z États-Unis. 
650 6 |a Politique et pouvoir judiciaire  |z États-Unis. 
650 6 |a Séparation des pouvoirs  |z États-Unis. 
651 6 |a États-Unis  |x Relations extérieures. 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Legal History.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Courts  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Diplomatic relations  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Judicial review  |2 fast 
650 7 |a National security  |x Law and legislation  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Political questions and judicial power  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Separation of powers  |2 fast 
651 7 |a United States  |2 fast 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Franck, Thomas M.  |t Political Questions Judicial Answers : Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs?  |d Princeton : Princeton University Press, ©2012  |z 9780691092416 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7s8pb  |z Texto completo 
938 |a EBL - Ebook Library  |b EBLB  |n EBL919503 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP