Cargando…
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said : the Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights Decision.
Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court's landmark 1954 decision ordering the desegregation of America's public schools, is perhaps the most famous case in American constitutional law. Criticized and even openly defied when first handed down, in half a century Brown has become a ven...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
New York :
NYU Press,
2001.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Preface; Part I: Brown v. Board of Education: A Critical Introduction; Chapter 1: Brown as Icon; Chapter 2: The History of the Brown Litigation; Chapter 3: Rewriting Brown: A Guide to the Opinions; Part II: Revised Opinions in Brown v. Board of Education; Jack M. Balkin (judgment of the Court); Drew S. Days III (concurring); Bruce Ackerman (concurring); Frank I. Michelman (concurring in part and concurring in the judgment); John Hart Ely (concurring in the judgment except as to the remedy); Catharine A. MacKinnon (concurring in the judgment).
- Michael W. McConnell (concurring in the judgment)Cass R. Sunstein (concurring in the judgment); Derrick A. Bell (dissenting); Comments from the Contributors; Appendix A: The Supreme Court's Original Opinions in Brown I, Bolling, and Brown II; Brown v. Board of Education (Brown I); Bolling v. Sharpe; Brown v. Board of Education (Brown II); Appendix B The Constitution of the United States of America: Selected Provisions; Brown v. Board of Education: A Selected Bibliography; About the Contributors; Table of Cases; Index.