Cargando…

Morality Imposed : the Rehnquist Court and the State of Liberty in America.

We like to think of judges and justices as making decisions based on the facts and the law. But to what extent do jurists decide cases in accordance with their own preexisting philosophy of law, and what specific ideological assumptions account for their decisions?. Stephen E. Gottlieb adopts a uniq...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Gottlieb, Stephen E.
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: New York : NYU Press, 2000.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Mi 4500
001 JSTOR_ocn779828105
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|---|||||
008 120312s2000 nyu o 000 0 eng d
040 |a EBLCP  |b eng  |e pn  |c EBLCP  |d OCLCQ  |d MHW  |d OCLCQ  |d CN8ML  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCF  |d YDXCP  |d OCLCQ  |d ZCU  |d MERUC  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d ICG  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d DKC  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d DEGRU  |d JSTOR  |d UKAHL  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO 
020 |a 9780814733301 
020 |a 0814733301 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000055798111 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV044162768 
029 1 |a DKDLA  |b 820120-katalog:999941914405765 
035 |a (OCoLC)779828105 
037 |a 22573/ctv2tpprck  |b JSTOR 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 4 |a KF8742 .G68 2000 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 025000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 347.7326 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Gottlieb, Stephen E. 
245 1 0 |a Morality Imposed :  |b the Rehnquist Court and the State of Liberty in America. 
260 |a New York :  |b NYU Press,  |c 2000. 
300 |a 1 online resource (358 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 |a Preface: Why and How This Book; Origins; The Gulf; Eclectic or Unprincipled?; Three Justices in Search of a Character; Between Two Worlds; Consensus on the Left; Calculus; Where Utilitarians Diverge; Coda; Ideological Canons; Notes; Bibliography; Index; About the Author. 
520 |a We like to think of judges and justices as making decisions based on the facts and the law. But to what extent do jurists decide cases in accordance with their own preexisting philosophy of law, and what specific ideological assumptions account for their decisions?. Stephen E. Gottlieb adopts a unique perspective on the decision-making of Supreme Court justices, blending and re-characterizing traditional accounts of political philosophy in a way that plausibly explains many of the justices' voting patterns. A seminal study of the Rehnquist Court, Morality Imposed illustrates how, in contrast t. 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA) 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court. 
600 1 0 |a Rehnquist, William H.,  |d 1924-2005. 
610 1 6 |a États-Unis.  |b Supreme Court. 
600 1 7 |a Rehnquist, William H.,  |d 1924-2005.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00186723 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00529481 
650 0 |a Law and ethics. 
650 6 |a Droit et morale. 
650 7 |a LAW / Courts.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Law and ethics.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00993904 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Gottlieb, Stephen E.  |t Morality Imposed : The Rehnquist Court and the State of Liberty in America.  |d New York : NYU Press, ©2000  |z 9780814731284 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/j.ctv2tr51t8  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH38342562 
938 |a De Gruyter  |b DEGR  |n 9780814733301 
938 |a EBL - Ebook Library  |b EBLB  |n EBL865498 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 7229171 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP