The new dialectic : conversational contexts of argument /

Mostrar otras versiones (1)

Because developments in informal logic have been based, for the most part, on idealized and abstract models, the tools available for argument analysis are not easily adapted to the needs of everyday argumentation. In this book Douglas Walton proposes a new and practical approach to argument analysis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Walton, Douglas N.
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Toronto ; Buffalo : University of Toronto Press, ©1998.
Colección:Toronto studies in philosophy.
Temas:
Reasoning.
Logic.
Dialogue.
Dialectic.
Dialogue > Philosophy.
Logic
Argumentation.
Logique.
Dialectique.
Dialogue > Philosophie.
logic.
dialectic.
PHILOSOPHY > Logic.
Dialogue > Philosophy
Dialectic
Dialogue
Reasoning
Diskursanalyse
Situativer Kontext
Argument > Linguistik
Argumentatie.
Discourse analysis.
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • CONTENTS
  • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
  • Chapter 1: Introduction
  • 1 Statement of Purpose
  • 2 Informal Logic and Fallacies
  • 3 Aristotle's Five Types of Arguments
  • 4 The Waning of Dialectic
  • 5 Locke's Four Kinds of Arguments
  • 6 Fallacies of Relevance
  • 7 Other Important Fallacies
  • 8 The New Approach to Dialectic
  • 9 Types of Dialogue
  • 10 Dialectical Relevance
  • Chapter 2: Persuasion Dialogue
  • 1 Main Characteristics
  • 2 Argument in Persuasion Dialogue
  • 3 Commitment
  • 4 Critical Discussion
  • 5 Nonexplicit Commitments
  • 6 Rigorous and Permissive Persuasion Dialogue7 Maieutic Function
  • 8 The Problem of Enthymemes
  • 9 Relevance in Persuasion Dialogue
  • 10 Evaluating Criticisms of Irrelevance
  • Chapter 3: The Inquiry
  • 1 Main Characteristics
  • 2 Advancing States of Knowledge
  • 3 Aristotelian Demonstration
  • 4 Is Scientific Argumentation an Inquiry?
  • 5 Other Subtypes of Inquiry
  • 6 Argument and Explanation
  • 7 Black and Beardsley on the Inquiry
  • 8 Cases of Public Inquiries
  • 9 Profiles of Dialogue in the Inquiry
  • 10 Relevance in the Inquiry
  • Chapter 4: Negotiation Dialogue1 Main Characteristics
  • 2 Subtypes
  • 3 The Game-Theory Model of Negotiation
  • 4 Commitment in Negotiation Dialogue
  • 5 Relevance and Irrelevance
  • 6 Threats as Arguments
  • 7 Dialectical Shifts from Negotiation
  • 8 Solutions for Deadlock
  • 9 Bias and Advocacy
  • 10 Advocacy Advertising
  • Chapter 5: Information-Seeking Dialogue
  • 1 Main Characteristics
  • 2 The Interview
  • 3 Searching a Database
  • 4 Position to Know
  • 5 Classification of Questions
  • 6 Presuppositions of Questions
  • 7 How Can a Question Be a Fallacy?8 Expert Consultation Dialogue
  • 9 Peirastic and Exetastic Dialogues
  • 10 Relevance in Information-Seeking Dialogue
  • Chapter 6: Deliberation
  • 1 Main Characteristics
  • 2 Practical Reasoning
  • 3 Argument from Consequences
  • 4 The Dilemma
  • 5 Stages and Dynamic Aspects of Deliberation
  • 6 Aristotle's Account of Deliberation
  • 7 The Town Hall Meeting
  • 8 Public and Political Deliberation
  • 9 Relevance in Deliberation
  • 10 Relevance Across Joined Dialogues
  • Chapter 7: Eristic Dialogue
  • 1 The Quarrel as Paradigm2 Eristic Dialogue
  • 3 Stages of the Quarrel
  • 4 Closed Attitude of Eristic Dialogue
  • 5 Plato on Eristic Argument
  • 6 Aristotle on Contentious Argument
  • 7 Modern Revival of Eristic Argument
  • 8 Relevance in Eristic Dialogue
  • 9 Subtypes of Eristic Dialogue
  • 10 Identifying Characteristics of Eristic Dialogue
  • Chapter 8: Dialectical Shifts
  • 1 Types of Shifts
  • 2 Licit and Illicit Shifts
  • 3 Licit Shifts to and from Expert Consultation Dialogue
  • 4 Illicit Shifts and Fallacious Arguments
  • 5 The Infomercial

Ejemplares similares