Miranda's waning protections : police interrogation practices after Dickerson /

Mostrar otras versiones (3)

"Of all the Supreme Court's criminal cases, its decision in Miranda v. Arizona has been the most controversial. When the case was decided in 1966, conservatives expressed the fear that law enforcement would be irreparably harmed because Miranda would significantly diminish the possibility...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: White, Welsh S., 1940-
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, ©2001.
Temas:
Right to counsel > United States.
Criminal investigation > United States.
Police questioning > United States.
Droit à un défenseur > États-Unis.
Enquêtes criminelles > États-Unis.
Interrogatoire policier > États-Unis.
Criminal investigation
Police questioning
Right to counsel
United States
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Introduction
  • The third degree
  • The evolution of modern police interrogation practices
  • The due process voluntariness test
  • Miranda and its immediate aftermath
  • Miranda's subsequent history
  • How modern interrogators have adapted to Miranda
  • Dickerson
  • Miranda's limitations
  • The third degree redux
  • Police-induced false confessions: the scope of the problem
  • Examples of police-induced false confessions
  • Providing adequate fact-finding in interrogation cases
  • Regulating interrogation practices in the twenty-first century
  • Conclusion.

Ejemplares similares