Beyond the formalist-realist divide : the role of politics in judging /

Mostrar otras versiones (3)

According to conventional wisdom in American legal culture, the 1870s to 1920s was the age of legal formalism, when judges believed that the law was autonomous and logically ordered, and that they mechanically deduced right answers in cases. In the 1920s and 1930s, the story continues, the legal rea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Tamanaha, Brian Z.
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Princeton : Princeton University Press, ©2010.
Temas:
Judges > United States.
Judicial process > United States.
Law > Political aspects > United States.
Law > United States > Philosophy.
Juges > États-Unis.
Processus judiciaire > États-Unis.
Droit > Aspect politique > États-Unis.
Droit > États-Unis > Philosophie.
POLITICAL SCIENCE > Government > Judicial Branch.
LAW > Legal Services.
LAW > Civil Procedure.
LAW > Jurisprudence.
Judges
Judicial process
Law > Philosophy
Law > Political aspects
United States
Legal formalism.
Legal realism.
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Cover; Title; Copyright; Contents; Acknowledgments; 1 Introduction; PART ONE: THE LEGAL FORMALISTS; 2 The Myth about Beliefs in the Common Law; 3 The Myth about "Mechanical Jurisprudence"; 4 The Holes in the Story about Legal Formalism; PART TWO: The Legal Realists; 5 Realism before the Legal Realists; 6 A Reconstruction of Legal Realism; PART THREE: STUDIES OF JUDGING; 7 The Slant in the "Judicial Politics" Field; 8 What Quantitative Studies of Judging Have Found; PART FOUR: LEGAL THEORY; 9 The Emptiness of "Formalism" in Legal Theory; 10 Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide; Afterword; Notes.

Ejemplares similares