|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a2200000 4500 |
001 |
JSTOR_ocn589856238 |
003 |
OCoLC |
005 |
20231005004200.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr bn||||||abp |
007 |
cr bn||||||ada |
008 |
100331s1972 pau ob 001 0 eng d |
040 |
|
|
|a OCLCE
|b eng
|e pn
|c OCLCE
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCF
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCA
|d DEGRU
|d JSTOR
|d LVT
|d U3W
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d OCL
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|
019 |
|
|
|a 300980907
|a 1024005618
|a 1029831028
|a 1032681316
|a 1037980509
|a 1041998394
|a 1046615248
|a 1047021136
|a 1049627099
|a 1054879473
|a 1089415256
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9781512815511
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|a 1512815519
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|z 0812290755
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9780812290752
|
024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.9783/9781512815511
|2 doi
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a GBVCP
|b 1048980383
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)589856238
|z (OCoLC)300980907
|z (OCoLC)1024005618
|z (OCoLC)1029831028
|z (OCoLC)1032681316
|z (OCoLC)1037980509
|z (OCoLC)1041998394
|z (OCoLC)1046615248
|z (OCoLC)1047021136
|z (OCoLC)1049627099
|z (OCoLC)1054879473
|z (OCoLC)1089415256
|
037 |
|
|
|a 22573/ctv4scxgr
|b JSTOR
|
042 |
|
|
|a dlr
|
043 |
|
|
|a n-us---
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a KF3431
|b .D47
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a BUS038000
|2 bisacsh
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a LAW054000
|2 bisacsh
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a BUS
|x 038000
|2 bisacsh
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a LAW
|x 054000
|2 bisacsh
|
082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 344/.73/01893
|
049 |
|
|
|a UAMI
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Dereshinsky, Ralph M.
|
245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The NLRB and secondary boycotts
|c by Ralph M. Dereshinsky.
|
260 |
|
|
|a Philadelphia,
|b Industrial Research Unit, Wharton School of Finance and Commerce, University of Pennsylvania; distributed by University of Pennsylvania Press
|c [1972]
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (vii, 131 pages)
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
347 |
|
|
|a text file
|
347 |
|
|
|b PDF
|
490 |
1 |
|
|a Labor relations and public policy series, report
|v no. 4
|
504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references.
|
506 |
|
|
|3 Use copy
|f Restrictions unspecified
|2 star
|5 MiAaHDL
|
533 |
|
|
|a Electronic reproduction.
|b [Place of publication not identified] :
|c HathiTrust Digital Library,
|d 2010.
|5 MiAaHDL
|
538 |
|
|
|a Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002.
|u http://purl.oclc.org/DLF/benchrepro0212
|5 MiAaHDL
|
583 |
1 |
|
|a digitized
|c 2010
|h HathiTrust Digital Library
|l committed to preserve
|2 pda
|5 MiAaHDL
|
588 |
0 |
|
|a Print version record.
|
505 |
0 |
0 |
|t Frontmatter --
|t Foreword --
|t Table of Contents --
|t I. Introduction --
|t II. Common-Situs Picketing --
|t III. The Ally Doctrine --
|t IV. Consumer Boycotts --
|t V. Hot-Cargo Agreements --
|t VI. Conclusion --
|t Index of Cases
|
520 |
|
|
|a As unions increasingly resort to corporate campaigns, top-down organizing, neutrality agreements, and consumer boycotts, it is easy to forget that federal labor laws were designed to eliminate the causes of substantial obstructions to the free flow of commerce. Our global economy continually shows that the fortunes of different companies increasingly are interdependent. At the same time, federal labor laws in the U.S. place important restrictions on secondary boycotts--defined as picketing or other union efforts based on one company's dispute to disrupt the affairs of other companies and consumers. Secondary boycotts have played an even more important role in the construction industry, where union disputes often affect dozens of employers working at a single location. Secondary boycotts present among the most complex problems dealt with by U.S. labor laws. This book examines how federal law limits secondary picketing and comparable activity, while preserving First Amendment free speech rights and protecting primary union activity, even though picketing or pressure directed toward one company almost always affects other parties and people. Ralph M. Dereshinsky looks at the development of labor law, National Labor Relations Board decisions, and court reviews relating to four types of secondary boycott situations. A case-by-case analysis is made to determine the direction and consistency of Board and cournt handling of labor-management disputes over common-situs picketing, allied employer picketing, consumer boycotts, and hot-cargo agreements.
|
546 |
|
|
|a In English.
|
590 |
|
|
|a JSTOR
|b Books at JSTOR Evidence Based Acquisitions
|
590 |
|
|
|a JSTOR
|b Books at JSTOR All Purchased
|
590 |
|
|
|a JSTOR
|b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA)
|
610 |
1 |
0 |
|a United States.
|b National Labor Relations Board.
|
610 |
1 |
6 |
|a États-Unis.
|b National Labor Relations Board.
|
610 |
1 |
7 |
|a United States.
|b National Labor Relations Board
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Boycotts
|x Law and legislation
|z United States.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Boycotts
|z United States.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Boycottage
|z États-Unis.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a BUSINESS & ECONOMICS
|x Labor.
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Boycotts
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Boycotts
|x Law and legislation
|2 fast
|
651 |
|
7 |
|a United States
|2 fast
|
776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version:
|a Dereshinsky, Ralph M.
|t NLRB and secondary boycotts.
|d Philadelphia, Industrial Research Unit, Wharton School of Finance and Commerce, University of Pennsylvania; distributed by University of Pennsylvania Press [1972]
|w (DLC) 72186694
|w (OCoLC)415913
|
830 |
|
0 |
|a Labor relations and public policy series, report ;
|v no. 4.
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/j.ctv4v2zkp
|z Texto completo
|
938 |
|
|
|a De Gruyter
|b DEGR
|n 9781512815511
|
994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b IZTAP
|