Cargando…

The Burke-Wollstonecraft debate : savagery, civilization, and democracy /

Many modern conservatives and feminists trace the roots of their ideologies, respectively, to Edmund Burke (1729-1797) and Mary Wollstonecraft (1759-1797), and a proper understanding of these two thinkers is therefore important as a framework for political debates today. According to Daniel O'N...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: O'Neill, Daniel I., 1967-
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: University Park : Pennsylvania State University Press, ©2007.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 a 4500
001 JSTOR_ocn233968899
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 080715s2007 pau ob 001 0 eng d
040 |a N$T  |b eng  |e pn  |c N$T  |d OCLCQ  |d YDXCP  |d OCLCQ  |d TUU  |d OCLCQ  |d E7B  |d OCLCQ  |d JSTOR  |d P@U  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCO  |d COO  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d EBLCP  |d DEBSZ  |d OCLCO  |d OCL  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d LTP  |d AGLDB  |d PIFAG  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCA  |d IOG  |d OCLCO  |d WY@  |d LUE  |d KIJ  |d VNS  |d VTS  |d M8D  |d OCLCA  |d OCLCQ  |d YKC  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCL  |d ESU  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO 
019 |a 785781064  |a 905085209  |a 1126075699 
020 |a 9780271034867  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 0271034866  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 9780271054735  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 0271054735  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 0271049715 
020 |a 9780271049717 
020 |a 9780271053066 
020 |a 0271053062 
020 |z 9780271032016 
020 |z 0271032014 
020 |z 9780271049717 
020 |z 0271032022 
020 |z 9780271032023 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000052144294 
029 1 |a DEBSZ  |b 449754332 
029 1 |a DEBSZ  |b 493066195 
029 1 |a NZ1  |b 14252955 
035 |a (OCoLC)233968899  |z (OCoLC)785781064  |z (OCoLC)905085209  |z (OCoLC)1126075699 
037 |a 22573/ctt4gf8k  |b JSTOR 
043 |a e-fr---  |a e-uk-st 
050 4 |a JC176  |b .O54 2007eb 
072 7 |a SOC  |x 002010  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL  |x 038000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a SOC  |x 022000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a PHI019000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 306.2  |2 22 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a O'Neill, Daniel I.,  |d 1967- 
245 1 4 |a The Burke-Wollstonecraft debate :  |b savagery, civilization, and democracy /  |c Daniel I. O'Neill. 
260 |a University Park :  |b Pennsylvania State University Press,  |c ©2007. 
300 |a 1 online resource (xii, 291 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 263-275) and index. 
505 0 |a The Scottish Enlightenment, the moral sense, and the civilizing process -- Burke and the Scottish Enlightenment -- Wollstonecraft and the Scottish Enlightenment -- "The most important of all revolutions" -- Vindicating a revolution in morals and manners -- Burke on democracy as the death of Western civilization -- Wollstonecraft on democracy as the birth of Western civilization. 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
520 |a Many modern conservatives and feminists trace the roots of their ideologies, respectively, to Edmund Burke (1729-1797) and Mary Wollstonecraft (1759-1797), and a proper understanding of these two thinkers is therefore important as a framework for political debates today. According to Daniel O'Neill, Burke is misconstrued if viewed as mainly providing a warning about the dangers of attempting to turn utopian visions into political reality, while Wollstonecraft is far more than just a proponent of extending the public sphere rights of man to include women. Rather, at the heart of their differences lies a dispute over democracy as a force tending toward savagery (Burke) or toward civilization (Wollstonecraft). Their debate over the meaning of the French Revolution is the place where these differences are elucidated, but the real key to understanding what this debate is about is its relation to the intellectual tradition of the Scottish Enlightenment, whose language of politics provided the discursive framework within and against which Burke and Wollstonecraft developed their own unique ideas about what was involved in the civilizing process. 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA) 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
600 1 0 |a Burke, Edmund,  |d 1729-1797. 
600 1 0 |a Wollstonecraft, Mary,  |d 1759-1797. 
600 1 1 |a Wollstonecraft, Mary,  |d 1759-1797. 
600 1 1 |a Burke, Edmund,  |d 1729-1797. 
600 1 7 |a Burke, Edmund,  |d 1729-1797  |2 fast 
600 1 7 |a Wollstonecraft, Mary,  |d 1759-1797  |2 fast 
651 0 |a France  |x History  |y Revolution, 1789-1799  |x Causes. 
650 0 |a Enlightenment  |z Scotland. 
650 6 |a Siècle des Lumières  |z Écosse. 
650 7 |a SOCIAL SCIENCE  |x Anthropology  |x Cultural.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Public Policy  |x Cultural Policy.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a SOCIAL SCIENCE  |x Popular Culture.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a PHILOSOPHY  |x Political.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Enlightenment  |2 fast 
650 7 |a War  |x Causes  |2 fast 
651 7 |a France  |2 fast 
651 7 |a Scotland  |2 fast 
647 7 |a Revolution  |c (France :  |d 1789-1799)  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01354514 
648 7 |a 1789-1799  |2 fast 
655 7 |a History  |2 fast 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a O'Neill, Daniel I., 1967-  |t Burke-Wollstonecraft debate.  |d University Park : Pennsylvania State University Press, ©2007  |z 9780271032016  |z 0271032014  |w (DLC) 2007002104  |w (OCoLC)82172553 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.5325/j.ctt7v2w9  |z Texto completo 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL6224047 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL3384981 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 228470 
938 |a Project MUSE  |b MUSE  |n muse10116 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 7586769 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 10761076 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 11820027 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 2848494 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP