Electoral realignments : a critique of an American genre /
"The study of electoral realignments is one of the most influential and intellectually stimulating enterprises undertaken by American political scientists. Realignment theory has been seen as a science able to predict changes, and generations of students, journalists, pundits, and political sci...
Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
---|---|
Autor principal: | |
Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
New Haven, CT :
Yale University Press,
2002.
|
Colección: | Yale ISPS series.
|
Temas: | |
Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Sumario: | "The study of electoral realignments is one of the most influential and intellectually stimulating enterprises undertaken by American political scientists. Realignment theory has been seen as a science able to predict changes, and generations of students, journalists, pundits, and political scientists have been trained to be on the lookout for "signs" of new electoral realignments. Now a major political scientist argues that the essential claims of realignment theory are wrong - that American elections, parties, and policy making are not (and never were) reconfigured according to the realignment calendar. David R. Mayhew is Sterling Professor of Political Science at Yale University."--BOOK JACKET. Title Summary field provided by Blackwell North America, Inc. All Rights Reserved |
---|---|
Descripción Física: | 1 online resource (viii, 174 pages) |
Bibliografía: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
ISBN: | 9780300130034 0300130031 9786611722296 6611722297 |