Cargando…

Judicial rhapsodies : rhetoric and fundamental rights in the Supreme Court /

All judges legitimize their decisions in writing, but US Supreme Court justices depend on public acceptance to a unique degree. Previous studies of judicial opinions have explored rhetorical strategies that produce legitimacy, but none have examined the laudatory, even operatic, forms of writing Sup...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Coulson, Doug, 1969- (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: [Amherst, MA] : Amherst College Press, 2023.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Ii 4500
001 JSTOROA_on1371449855
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr unu||||||||
008 230301t20232023mau ob 001 0 eng d
040 |a EYM  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c EYM  |d JSTOR  |d ACPRS  |d OCLCF  |d P@U  |d UKKNU  |d OCLCQ  |d AMH  |d OCLCO 
020 |a 9781943208470  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 1943208476  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 9781943208463  |q (paperback) 
020 |z 1943208468  |q (paperback) 
024 7 |a 10.3998/mpub.12752816  |2 doi 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000073515235 
035 |a (OCoLC)1371449855 
037 |a 22573/cats509053  |b JSTOR 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 4 |a KF8742  |b .C678 2023eb 
082 0 4 |a 347.7326  |2 23/eng/20230303 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Coulson, Doug,  |d 1969-  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Judicial rhapsodies :  |b rhetoric and fundamental rights in the Supreme Court /  |c Doug Coulson. 
264 1 |a [Amherst, MA] :  |b Amherst College Press,  |c 2023. 
264 4 |c ©2023 
300 |a 1 online resource (viii, 276 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 239 -256) and index. 
505 0 |a Introduction : Rhapsodic Jurisprudence -- 1. Judicial and Epideictic Rhetoric : A False Division -- 2. Freedom of Speech, Paramologia, and the Flag -- 3. Keeping Government Out of Religion and Vice Versa -- 4. Storms, Shadows, and Privacy -- Conclusion : Truth Has No Bones 
506 |a Open access.  |5 MiU 
520 3 |a All judges legitimize their decisions in writing, but US Supreme Court justices depend on public acceptance to a unique degree. Previous studies of judicial opinions have explored rhetorical strategies that produce legitimacy, but none have examined the laudatory, even operatic, forms of writing Supreme Court justices have used to justify fundamental rights decisions. Doug Coulson demonstrates that such "judicial rhapsodies" are not an aberration but a central feature of judicial discourse. First examining the classical origins of divisions between law and rhetoric, Coulson tracks what he calls an epideictic register--highly affective forms of expression that utilize hyperbole, amplification, and vocabularies of praise--through a surprising number of landmark Supreme Court opinions. Judicial Rhapsodies recovers and revalues these instances as significant to establishing and maintaining shared perspectives that form the basis for common experience and cooperation. 
542 |f This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivatives  |u https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 
588 |a Description based on information from the publisher. 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Open Access 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court  |x Decision making. 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court  |x Language. 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court  |2 fast 
650 0 |a Judicial process  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Judicial opinions  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Rhetoric  |x Political aspects  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Law  |z United States  |x Methodology. 
650 0 |a Civil rights  |z United States. 
650 6 |a Processus judiciaire  |z États-Unis. 
650 6 |a Jugements  |z États-Unis. 
650 6 |a Discours politique  |z États-Unis. 
650 6 |a Droit  |z États-Unis  |x Méthodologie. 
650 6 |a Droits de l'homme  |z États-Unis. 
650 7 |a Law.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Language Arts & Disciplines / Rhetoric.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Law / Judicial Power.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Civil rights  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Decision making  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Judicial opinions  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Judicial process  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Language and languages  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Law  |x Methodology  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Rhetoric  |x Political aspects  |2 fast 
651 7 |a United States  |2 fast 
710 2 |a Amherst College.  |b Press,  |e publisher. 
710 2 |a Michigan Publishing (University of Michigan),  |e distributor. 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.3998/mpub.12752816  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Knowledge Unlatched  |b KNOW  |n 9050b4ab-cf0a-4baf-a9d3-dd2f2e151d81 
938 |a Project MUSE  |b MUSE  |n musev2_110807 
938 |a Amherst College Press  |b AMCP  |n 10.3998/mpub.12752816 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP