Cargando…

Common law judging : subjectivity, impartiality, and the making of law /

Are judges supposed to be objective? Citizens, scholars, and legal professionals commonly assume that subjectivity and objectivity are opposites, with the corollary that subjectivity is a vice and objectivity is a virtue. These assumptions underlie passionate debates over adherence to original inten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Edlin, Douglas E. (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, [2016]
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000001i 4500
001 JSTOROA_on1196819675
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 160209s2016 miu ob 001 0 eng
010 |a  2020707300 
040 |a DLC  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c DLC  |d OCLCO  |d UAB  |d OCLCF  |d UKKNU  |d N$T  |d P@U  |d IDEBK  |d EBLCP  |d JSTOR  |d YDX  |d CSAIL  |d IDB  |d OTZ  |d IOG  |d U3W  |d AU@  |d CUS  |d UNOMP  |d AUD  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d SFB  |d OCLCQ 
019 |a 956541684  |a 959909678  |a 1058132704  |a 1164781739  |a 1301543939  |a 1363107707  |a 1378243175  |a 1388515984  |a 1390566620  |a 1390930697  |a 1395190426  |a 1397401092  |a 1399368982 
020 |a 9780472122158  |q (e-book) 
020 |a 0472122150 
020 |a 0472902342 
020 |a 9780472902347 
020 |z 9780472130023  |q (hardcover ;  |q alk. paper) 
020 |z 0472130021 
024 8 |a 10.3998/mpub.3783964 
024 8 |a https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.3783964 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000058830716 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000073109636 
029 1 |a CHNEW  |b 000885810 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV043895489 
035 |a (OCoLC)1196819675  |z (OCoLC)956541684  |z (OCoLC)959909678  |z (OCoLC)1058132704  |z (OCoLC)1164781739  |z (OCoLC)1301543939  |z (OCoLC)1363107707  |z (OCoLC)1378243175  |z (OCoLC)1388515984  |z (OCoLC)1390566620  |z (OCoLC)1390930697  |z (OCoLC)1395190426  |z (OCoLC)1397401092  |z (OCoLC)1399368982 
037 |a 22573/ctt1dsr2kz  |b JSTOR 
050 0 0 |a K2146 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 101000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 044000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 052000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 071000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 098000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 079000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL040030  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL000000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 0 |a 340.5/7  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Edlin, Douglas E.,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Common law judging :  |b subjectivity, impartiality, and the making of law /  |c Douglas E. Edlin. 
264 1 |a Ann Arbor :  |b University of Michigan Press,  |c [2016] 
300 |a 1 online resource 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 229-244) and indexes. 
505 0 |a Introduction -- Subjectivity, objectivity, impartiality -- Subjectivity and intersubjectivity -- Making law -- Judicial individualism and judicial independence -- Conclusion. 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
520 |a Are judges supposed to be objective? Citizens, scholars, and legal professionals commonly assume that subjectivity and objectivity are opposites, with the corollary that subjectivity is a vice and objectivity is a virtue. These assumptions underlie passionate debates over adherence to original intent and judicial activism. Douglas Edlin challenges these widely held assumptions by reorienting the entire discussion. Rather than analyze judging in terms of objectivity and truth, he argues that we should instead approach the role of a judge's individual perspective in terms of intersubjectivity and validity. Drawing upon Kantian aesthetic theory as well as case law, legal theory, and constitutional theory, Edlin develops a new conceptual framework for the respective roles of the individual judge and of the judiciary as an institution, as well as the relationship between them, as integral parts of the broader legal and political community. 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Open Access 
650 0 |a Common law. 
650 0 |a Judicial process  |z English-speaking countries. 
650 6 |a Common law. 
650 6 |a Processus judiciaire  |z Anglophonie. 
650 7 |a Political Science  |x American Government  |x Judicial Branch.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Common law.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00869795 
650 7 |a Judicial process.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00984705 
651 7 |a English-speaking countries.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01261775 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |t Common law judging.  |d Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, [2016]  |z 9780472130023  |w (DLC) 2016006681 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.3998/mpub.3783964  |z Texto completo 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 1334741 
938 |a Knowledge Unlatched  |b KNOW  |n 925011e5-605e-49aa-8c07-d20a14eaa405 
938 |a Project MUSE  |b MUSE  |n muse54267 
938 |a University of Michigan press  |b UOMP  |n 10.3998/mpub.3783964 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 13108164 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 19382195 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP