Cargando…

Enhanced Army airborne forces : a new joint operational capability /

At the request of U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command, a RAND research team examined options to increase the mobility, protection, and firepower of the Army's airborne forces, given likely future missions and threats, identifying a concept for enhancing today's forces by adding a light...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autores principales: Gordon, John, 1956- (Autor), Schaefer, Agnes Gereben (Autor), Shlapak, David A. (Autor)
Autor Corporativo: Arroyo Center
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Santa Monica, Calif. : RAND, [2014]
Colección:Research report (Rand Corporation) ; RR309.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 JSTOROA_ocn903138869
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 150210s2014 caua ob 000 0 eng
040 |a AD#  |b eng  |e pn  |c AD#  |d DID  |d JSTOR  |d YDXCP  |d OCLCQ  |d N$T  |d COO  |d OCLCQ  |d LND  |d VT2  |d VFL  |d LOA  |d ICG  |d OCLCF  |d U3W  |d ICN  |d AU@  |d ERL  |d WYU  |d TXR  |d VLY  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ 
019 |a 901423525  |a 903594611  |a 1008942533  |a 1058395124  |a 1066457701  |a 1115105213  |a 1162408542  |a 1367358156  |a 1395605895  |a 1398111257 
020 |a 9780833090027  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 083309002X  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 9780833082169 
020 |z 0833082167 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000061154552 
029 1 |a GBVCP  |b 100866314X 
035 |a (OCoLC)903138869  |z (OCoLC)901423525  |z (OCoLC)903594611  |z (OCoLC)1008942533  |z (OCoLC)1058395124  |z (OCoLC)1066457701  |z (OCoLC)1115105213  |z (OCoLC)1162408542  |z (OCoLC)1367358156  |z (OCoLC)1395605895  |z (OCoLC)1398111257 
037 |a 22573/ctt13xb8kq  |b JSTOR 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 4 |a UD483 
072 7 |a HIS027140  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a TEC025000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a HIS027060  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 356.1660973  |2 23 
088 |a RAND RR309 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Gordon, John,  |d 1956-  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Enhanced Army airborne forces :  |b a new joint operational capability /  |c John Gordon IV, Agnes Gereben Schaefer, David A. Shlapak, Caroline Baxter, Scott Boston, Michael McGee, Todd Nichols, Elizabeth Tencza. 
264 1 |a Santa Monica, Calif. :  |b RAND,  |c [2014] 
300 |a 1 online resource (xxvi, 106 pages) :  |b color illustrations 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a RAND Corporation research report series ;  |v RR309 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 103-106). 
505 2 |a Introduction -- Overview of the current airborne force -- Threats to today's airborne forces -- A proposed airborne light armored infantry force -- Airlift issues and requirements -- Potential uses for airborne light armored infantry forces -- Issues related to the implementation of the new concept -- Conclusions and recommendations -- Appendixes -- Bibliography. 
520 |a At the request of U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command, a RAND research team examined options to increase the mobility, protection, and firepower of the Army's airborne forces, given likely future missions and threats, identifying a concept for enhancing today's forces by adding a light armored infantry capability. Because the Army requested near-term options, the new concept incorporates equipment and platforms that are already available within the U.S. Department of Defense. The near-term focus also meant that the current Air Force airlift fleet was an important consideration, since Army airborne forces rely on Air Force transport aircraft to deploy. The research team examined notional future brigade- and battalion-sized airborne units, including the numbers and types of vehicles that would be needed to create an airborne light armored force that could be airdropped or air-landed from Air Force transport planes. The primary light armored vehicle possibilities studied were the Stryker (currently used by the Army) and the Light Armored Vehicle, second generation (LAV-II, used by the Marine Corps and the militaries of several other nations). Each family of vehicles would have advantages and disadvantages for the Army's airborne force, with the LAV-II provisionally identified as the preferred candidate. A tabletop exercise with subject-matter experts, using scenarios developed through a review of historical Army missions, identified how the addition of light armor could enhance the performance of airborne units. 
500 |a "Prepared for the United States Army." 
588 0 |a Online resource; title from PDF title page (RAND, viewed February 10, 2015). 
546 |a English. 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Open Access 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Army  |x Airborne troops  |x Reorganization. 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Army  |x Airborne troops  |x Equipment. 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Army.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00533532 
650 0 |a Armored vehicles, Military  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Airborne operations (Military science) 
650 6 |a Engins blindés  |z États-Unis. 
650 6 |a Opérations aéroportées. 
650 7 |a HISTORY  |x Military  |x Aviation.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Airborne operations (Military science)  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00802764 
650 7 |a Armored vehicles, Military.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00814878 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
700 1 |a Schaefer, Agnes Gereben,  |e author. 
700 1 |a Shlapak, David A.,  |e author. 
710 2 |a Rand Corporation,  |e issuing body. 
710 2 |a Arroyo Center. 
776 0 |z 0833082167 
830 0 |a Research report (Rand Corporation) ;  |v RR309. 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.7249/j.ctt14bs1w5  |z Texto completo 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 12390014 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP