|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a2200000 i 4500 |
001 |
JSTOROA_ocn870536704 |
003 |
OCoLC |
005 |
20231005004200.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr mn||||||||| |
008 |
140214s2013 caua obt 000 0 eng |
040 |
|
|
|a AD#
|b eng
|e pn
|c AD#
|d DID
|d JSTOR
|d COO
|d OCLCO
|d JSTOR
|d CUI
|d YDXCP
|d OCLCQ
|d LND
|d VT2
|d LOA
|d ICG
|d OCLCA
|d OCLCF
|d U3W
|d ICN
|d ERL
|d NJT
|d OCLCA
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|
019 |
|
|
|a 869462573
|a 900420686
|a 1006969596
|a 1008961538
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9780833084729
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|a 0833084720
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9780833081773
|
020 |
|
|
|z 0833081772
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a AU@
|b 000061155808
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a GBVCP
|b 1008660965
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)870536704
|z (OCoLC)869462573
|z (OCoLC)900420686
|z (OCoLC)1006969596
|z (OCoLC)1008961538
|
037 |
|
|
|a 22573/ctt5p35gg
|b JSTOR
|
043 |
|
|
|a n-us---
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a VA58.4
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a POL035000
|2 bisacsh
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a POL016000
|2 bisacsh
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a TEC025000
|2 bisacsh
|
082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 359.30973
|2 23
|
088 |
|
|
|a RAND RR357
|
049 |
|
|
|a UAMI
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Wong, Carolyn,
|d 1952-
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Authority to issue interoperability policy /
|c Carolyn Wong, Daniel Gonzales.
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a Santa Monica, CA :
|b RAND,
|c 2013.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (xx, 69 pages) :
|b illustrations
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
490 |
1 |
|
|a RAND Corporation research report series ;
|v RR357-NAVY
|
504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references (page 69).
|
500 |
|
|
|a "Prepared for the United States Navy. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited."
|
520 |
|
|
|a Achieving interoperability among systems is instrumental to enabling critical functions, such as timely information exchange during operations and efficiencies in acquisition, so it is important to understand what parties have authority to issue policy that governs the facets of interoperability. This report presents an approach and framework for determining what parties have authority to issue interoperability policy, the legal and policy origins and implementation paths of the authority, and the extent of the authority. The approach includes rigorous analysis by researchers to identify pertinent authorities in federal law supplemented by a means to facilitate discovery of roles and responsibilities in Department of Defense and Service-level policies. The approach results in a roles and responsibilities network that traces the paths of authority available to issue interoperability policy. The authors use as a case study the authority of the Assistant Secretary of the Navy, Research, Development, and Acquisition, Chief Systems Engineer to issue Navy interoperability policy related to mission area systems engineering (MASE) to demonstrate the use of the framework and methodology. They find that there are 13 different paths of authority that could be cited by four different parties to claim authority to influence interoperability policy related to MASE. The approach used in this report might be developed, along with complementary analytic techniques, to provide the government with the ability to create and maintain consistent and comprehensive bodies of policy that will ensure the effective and efficient operation of defense agencies.
|
536 |
|
|
|a This research was conducted ... under contract W74V8H-06-C-0002.
|
588 |
0 |
|
|a Print version record.
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Introduction -- Framework and Methodology -- Analysis of Authority to Issue Navy Interoperability Policy -- ASN(RD & A) CHSEN G Case Study -- Recommendations and Closing Remarks -- Appendix A: Electronic Policy Improvement Capability (EPIC) -- Appendix B: Statements of Authority -- Appendix C: Authority of Other Officials.
|
590 |
|
|
|a JSTOR
|b Books at JSTOR All Purchased
|
590 |
|
|
|a JSTOR
|b Books at JSTOR Open Access
|
610 |
1 |
0 |
|a United States.
|b Navy
|x Management.
|
610 |
1 |
0 |
|a United States.
|b Navy
|x Personnel management.
|
610 |
1 |
7 |
|a United States.
|b Navy
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Sea-power
|z United States
|x Management.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Organizational effectiveness.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Puissance maritime
|z États-Unis
|x Gestion.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Efficacité organisationnelle.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a POLITICAL SCIENCE
|x Political Freedom.
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Armed Forces
|x Management
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Armed Forces
|x Personnel management
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Organizational effectiveness
|2 fast
|
651 |
|
7 |
|a United States
|2 fast
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Gonzales, Daniel,
|d 1956-
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a Rand Corporation,
|e issuing body.
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a National Defense Research Institute (U.S.),
|e sponsoring body.
|
776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version:
|a Wong, Carolyn, 1952-
|t Authority to issue interoperability policy.
|d Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2014
|z 9780833081773
|w (DLC) 2013048222
|w (OCoLC)864789909
|
830 |
|
0 |
|a Research report (Rand Corporation) ;
|v RR357-NAVY.
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.7249/j.ctt5vjxbp
|z Texto completo
|
938 |
|
|
|a YBP Library Services
|b YANK
|n 11821033
|
994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b IZTAP
|