Cargando…

Assessment of beddown alternatives for the F-35 /

As currently planned, the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is the most costly aircraft acquisition program in Defense Department history. One approach to ensuring program affordability could be to increase the number of Primary Aerospace Vehicles Authorized (PAA) per combat-coded squadron, with a resulting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autores Corporativos: Project Air Force (U.S.). Resource Management Program, Rand Corporation, United States. Air Force
Otros Autores: McGarvey, Ronald G., Bigelow, J. H., Briggs, Gary, Buryk, Peter, Conley, Raymond E., Drew, John G., 1956-, Firoz, Perry Shameem, Kim, Julie, Menthe, Lance, Moore, S. Craig, 1946-, Taylor, William W., 1938-, Williams, William A., 1952-
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2013.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Ia 4500
001 JSTOROA_ocn840466600
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr cn|||||||||
008 090327s2013 caua ob 000 0 eng d
040 |a COO  |b eng  |e pn  |c COO  |d OCLCO  |d COD  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCA  |d JSTOR  |d UAT  |d OCLCA  |d YDXCP  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCA  |d OCLCQ  |d LND  |d LOA  |d ICG  |d OCLCA  |d OCLCF  |d U3W  |d ICN  |d CEF  |d ERL  |d NJT  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCA  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO 
019 |a 857902912  |a 902737639  |a 1044488065  |a 1060861490  |a 1074297766  |a 1087390892 
020 |a 9780833083296  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 0833083295  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 9780833078070 
020 |z 0833078070 
027 |a RAND/RR-124-AF 
029 1 |a GBVCP  |b 1008658561 
035 |a (OCoLC)840466600  |z (OCoLC)857902912  |z (OCoLC)902737639  |z (OCoLC)1044488065  |z (OCoLC)1060861490  |z (OCoLC)1074297766  |z (OCoLC)1087390892 
037 |a 22573/ctt4cxsjp  |b JSTOR 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 4 |a UG1242.F5  |b A88 2013 
072 7 |a TEC025000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a BUS030000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a TRA002000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 358.4/383  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
245 0 0 |a Assessment of beddown alternatives for the F-35 /  |c Ronald G. McGarvey [and others]. 
260 |a Santa Monica, CA :  |b RAND,  |c 2013. 
300 |a 1 online resource (xxxi, 109 pages) :  |b color illustrations 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
500 |a "RAND Project Air Force." 
500 |a "This research was conducted within the Resource Management Program of RAND PAF"--Preface. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 107-109). 
505 0 |a Introduction -- Deployment Requirements -- Pilot Absorption -- Logistics Resources -- Infrastructure -- Leadership Development -- Conclusions. 
520 |a As currently planned, the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is the most costly aircraft acquisition program in Defense Department history. One approach to ensuring program affordability could be to increase the number of Primary Aerospace Vehicles Authorized (PAA) per combat-coded squadron, with a resulting reduction in the number of F-35 combat-coded squadrons. RAND explored the impact of increasing the PAA per squadron, adjusting the mix of PAA across the Active and Reserve Components, and adjusting the percentage of the Active Component PAA assigned to home-station locations in the continental United States. Researchers considered 28 beddown alternatives, with a maximum of 36 PAA per squadron, and determined that all beddowns could satisfy surge deployment requirements and most could also satisfy rotational requirements within specified deploy-to-dwell ratios. Increasing squadron size was determined to significantly reduce (a) the flying costs necessary to achieve pilot absorption requirements, (b) maintenance manpower requirements, and (c) total support equipment procurement costs, while little additional infrastructure capacity would be required under any of the 28 basing alternatives considered. Additional analysis suggested that assignment policy would have more effect on leader development than either squadron size or the active-reserve mix. 
588 0 |a Print version. 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Open Access 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Air Force  |x Reorganization. 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Air Force  |x Appropriations and expenditures. 
610 1 6 |a États-Unis.  |b Air Force  |x Réorganisation. 
610 1 6 |a États-Unis.  |b Air Force  |x Crédits budgétaires et dépenses. 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Air Force  |2 fast 
650 0 |a F-35 (Military aircraft)  |x Costs. 
650 6 |a F-35 (Avion militaire)  |x Coût. 
650 7 |a TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING  |x Military Science.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Armed Forces  |x Appropriations and expenditures  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Armed Forces  |x Reorganization  |2 fast 
700 1 |a McGarvey, Ronald G. 
700 1 |a Bigelow, J. H. 
700 1 |a Briggs, Gary. 
700 1 |a Buryk, Peter. 
700 1 |a Conley, Raymond E. 
700 1 |a Drew, John G.,  |d 1956- 
700 1 |a Firoz, Perry Shameem. 
700 1 |a Kim, Julie. 
700 1 |a Menthe, Lance. 
700 1 |a Moore, S. Craig,  |d 1946- 
700 1 |a Taylor, William W.,  |d 1938- 
700 1 |a Williams, William A.,  |d 1952- 
710 2 |a Project Air Force (U.S.).  |b Resource Management Program. 
710 2 |a Rand Corporation. 
710 1 |a United States.  |b Air Force. 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |t Assessment of beddown alternatives for the F-35.  |d Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2013  |z 9780833078070  |z 0833078070  |w (DLC) 2013005932  |w (OCoLC)827724519 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.7249/j.ctt5hhvvt  |z Texto completo 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 11820978 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP