Cargando…

Deregulating school aid in California : revenues and expenditures in the second year of categorical flexibility /

California's system of school finance is highly regulated and prescriptive. A large share of state funding is allocated through categorical programs; that is, programs whose funding is contingent on districts using the money in a particular way or for a particular purpose. In 2008-09, the strin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Imazeki, Jennifer (Autor)
Autores Corporativos: Rand Education (Institute), Policy Analysis for California Education (Organization)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Santa Monica, CA : Rand Corporation, 2012.
Colección:Technical report (Rand Corporation) ; TR-1229/1-WFHF/DCKF/STF.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Ia 4500
001 JSTOROA_ocn813854859
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr un|||||||||
008 121022s2012 caua ob 000 0 eng d
040 |a COD  |b eng  |e pn  |c COD  |d COD  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCA  |d JSTOR  |d NUI  |d YDXCP  |d LLB  |d OCLCQ  |d UAT  |d TEF  |d CUS  |d OCLCQ  |d LND  |d LOA  |d ICG  |d OCLCF  |d U3W  |d CEF  |d AU@  |d ERL  |d WYU  |d ICN  |d TXR  |d NJT  |d SFB  |d VT2  |d UWK  |d SXB  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d VHC  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO 
019 |a 855381856  |a 1044421830  |a 1066572748  |a 1125672333  |a 1129378582  |a 1136330443  |a 1144404936  |a 1166283883  |a 1171481317  |a 1182823096  |a 1303485182 
020 |a 9780833079824  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 0833079824  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 9780833075208  |q (pbk.) 
020 |z 0833075209  |q (pbk.) 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000051565988 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000061153639 
029 1 |a GBVCP  |b 1008657824 
035 |a (OCoLC)813854859  |z (OCoLC)855381856  |z (OCoLC)1044421830  |z (OCoLC)1066572748  |z (OCoLC)1125672333  |z (OCoLC)1129378582  |z (OCoLC)1136330443  |z (OCoLC)1144404936  |z (OCoLC)1166283883  |z (OCoLC)1171481317  |z (OCoLC)1182823096  |z (OCoLC)1303485182 
037 |a 22573/ctt36szj1  |b JSTOR 
043 |a n-us-ca 
050 4 |a LC66.5.C2 
072 7 |a EDU011000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a EDU034000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a EDU043000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 338.4/73709794  |2 23 
088 |a TR-1229/1-WFHF/DCKF/STF 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Imazeki, Jennifer,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Deregulating school aid in California :  |b revenues and expenditures in the second year of categorical flexibility /  |c Jennifer Imazeki. 
246 1 0 |a Revenues and expenditures in the second year of categorical flexibility 
260 |a Santa Monica, CA :  |b Rand Corporation,  |c 2012. 
300 |a 1 online resource (xv, 53 pages) :  |b illustrations 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file 
347 |b PDF 
490 1 |a RAND Corporation report series ;  |v TR-1229/1-WFHF/DCKF/STF 
500 |a "RAND Education." 
500 |a "PACE Policy Analysis for California Education." 
500 |a "The research ... was supported by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the Dirk and Charlene Kabcenell Foundation, and the Stuart Foundation, and was conducted by PACE research network and RAND Education, a division of the RAND Corporation"--Title page verso 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (page 53). 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
505 0 |a Introduction -- Background -- Data -- Distribution of Revenue -- Spending Priorities -- Conclusion. 
520 |a California's system of school finance is highly regulated and prescriptive. A large share of state funding is allocated through categorical programs; that is, programs whose funding is contingent on districts using the money in a particular way or for a particular purpose. In 2008-09, the strings were taken off 40 of those programs, collectively known as the "Tier 3" programs, as part of a budget deal that also reduced the funding for those programs. The author gathers evidence about how districts have responded to this fiscal freedom, particularly how resource allocations are made at the district level and what specific changes districts have made in their allocations. Although concerns have been raised that those districts with relatively more Tier 3 funding have been disproportionately affected by the state's budget crisis, the data show that districts with more Tier 3 funding lost a similar share of their budget as other districts (although that represents larger per-pupil dollar amounts). Furthermore, so far and on average, districts do not appear to be making large-scale changes in how they are spending their money. Individual chapters contain footnotes. (Contains 1 figure and 24 tables.) 
546 |a English. 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Open Access 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
650 0 |a Government aid to education  |x Deregulation  |z California. 
650 6 |a Aide de l'État à l'éducation  |x Déréglementation  |z Californie. 
650 7 |a EDUCATION  |x Evaluation & Assessment.  |2 bisacsh 
651 7 |a California  |2 fast 
710 2 |a Rand Education (Institute) 
710 2 |a Policy Analysis for California Education (Organization) 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Imazeki, Jennifer.  |t Deregulating school aid in California.  |d Santa Monica, CA : Rand Corporation, 2012  |z 9780833075208  |w (DLC) 2012941293  |w (OCoLC)796756981 
830 0 |a Technical report (Rand Corporation) ;  |v TR-1229/1-WFHF/DCKF/STF. 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.7249/j.ctt3fh0jt  |z Texto completo 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 11820913 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP