Responsibility to protect (R2P) revisited Towards climate change-related obligations of states?.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Kring, Franziska-Carolin
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Berlin : BWV Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2020.
Colección:Bochumer Schriften zur Friedenssicherung und zum humanitären Völkerrecht.
Temas:
Responsibility to protect (International law)
Responsabilité de protéger (Droit international)
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Intro
  • Acknowledgements
  • Abstract
  • Table of contents
  • List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
  • List of Tables
  • List of Figures
  • A. Introduction
  • I. Introductory remarks
  • II. Climate change and displacement
  • 1. Observed effects and drivers of climate change
  • 2. Future impacts of climate change
  • 3. Adaptation and mitigation
  • III. Political and legal responses to climate change
  • 1. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
  • 2. Kyoto Protocol
  • 3. 2015 Paris Agreement
  • 4. Remarks
  • IV. Research objective
  • 1. The gap in legal literature
  • 2. Research question
  • 3. Analytical framework
  • B. Human rights dimension of climate change
  • I. Climate change effects as human rights violations?
  • 1. Individual human rights
  • 2. Collective human rights
  • 3. Human rights violations in a strict legal sense?
  • II. States' human rights obligations regarding climate change
  • 1. Potential scenarios
  • a) Extreme humanitarian catastrophes
  • aa) States' obligations towards their own population
  • bb) States' obligations towards populations of other states
  • (1) Potential obligations
  • (2) Legal bases
  • (A) Extraterritorial extension of environmental human rights jurisprudence
  • (b) Obligations under the international duty of cooperation
  • (c) Obligations under international refugee law
  • b) Mitigation of climate change
  • aa) States' obligations towards their own populations
  • bb) States' obligations towards populations of other states
  • (1) Potential obligations
  • cc) Erga omnes obligations
  • 2. Remarks
  • III. Conclusion
  • C. The responsibility to protect
  • I. History
  • 1. International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty
  • 2. High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges, and Change
  • 3. World Summit Outcome document
  • 4. Annual reports of the Secretary-General
  • 5. Security Council resolutions
  • a) Resolution 1970
  • b) Resolution 1973
  • 6. Responsibility to protect after Libya and Syria: sudden death?
  • II. Theoretical foundations
  • 1. Obligations inherent in the concept of state sovereignty
  • 2. Responsibility of the Security Council
  • 3. International human rights law, humanitarian law, and national laws
  • 4. Developing practice of states, regional organisations, and the Security Council
  • III. Legal status
  • 1. Legal status of the entire concept
  • a) Customary international law
  • aa) General Assembly and Security Council
  • bb) Other international institutions
  • cc) Proponents of the responsibility to protect
  • (1) European states
  • (a) United Kingdom
  • (b) France
  • (c) Germany
  • (d) Remarks
  • (2) African states
  • (3) The Americas
  • (a) Canada
  • (b) Brazil
  • (c) United States of America
  • (d) Remarks
  • dd) Opponents of the responsibility to protect
  • (1) Russia
  • (2) China
  • (3) Remarks
  • b) Emerging norm of international law
  • c) Conclusion

Ejemplares similares