Cargando…

Arguing about climate change judging the handling of climate risk to future generations by comparison to the general standards of conduct in the case of risk to contemporaries /

Intergenerational justice requires that climate risks to future generations be handled with the same reasonable care deemed acceptable by society in the case of risks to contemporaries. Such general standards of conduct are laid down in tort law, for example. Consequently, the validity of arguments...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Davidson, Marc David, 1966-
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Amsterdam : Amsterdam University Press, c2008.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Ma 4500
001 EBSCO_on1162379214
003 OCoLC
005 20231017213018.0
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 100417s2008 ne ob i000 0 eng d
040 |a VLY  |b eng  |c VLY  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ 
020 |a 9786612453847 
020 |a 6612453842 
020 |a 9048508347 
020 |a 9789048508341 
035 |a (OCoLC)1162379214 
050 4 |a GE195.7  |b .D38 2008 
082 0 4 |a 350  |a 363.738/74 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Davidson, Marc David,  |d 1966- 
245 1 0 |a Arguing about climate change  |h [electronic resource] :  |b judging the handling of climate risk to future generations by comparison to the general standards of conduct in the case of risk to contemporaries /  |c Marc David Davidson. 
260 |a Amsterdam :  |b Amsterdam University Press,  |c c2008. 
300 |a 1 online resource (148 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt 
337 |a computer  |b c 
338 |a online resource  |b cr 
505 0 |a General introduction; Chapter 1: An inconvenient truth; Chapter 2: Climate damage as wrongful harm to future generations; Chapter 3: Regulation of climate change and the reasonable man standard; Chapter 4: A social discount rate for climate damage to future generations based on regulatory law; Chapter 5: How reasonable man discounts climate damage; Chapter 6: Parallels in reactionary argumentation in the US congressional debates on the abolition of slavery and the Kyoto Protocol; Summary; Nederlandse samenvatting; Acknowledgements; Curriculum vitae 
520 |a Intergenerational justice requires that climate risks to future generations be handled with the same reasonable care deemed acceptable by society in the case of risks to contemporaries. Such general standards of conduct are laid down in tort law, for example. Consequently, the validity of arguments for or against more stringent climate policy can be judged by comparison to the general standards of conduct applying in the case of risk to contemporaries. That this consistency test is able to disqualify certain arguments in the climate debate is illustrated by a further investigation of the debat. 
546 |a English. 
500 |a The work was "financed by the Dutch Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) in the context of the programme Ethics, Research & Public Policy, and the Dutch Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM)." 
500 |a Originally presented as the author's Ph.D Thesis from the University of Amsterdam. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references. 
590 |a eBooks on EBSCOhost  |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide 
650 0 |a Environmental ethics. 
650 0 |a Climatic changes  |x Moral and ethical aspects. 
650 0 |a Environmental responsibility. 
650 6 |a Éthique de l'environnement. 
650 6 |a Climat  |x Changements  |x Aspect moral. 
650 6 |a Responsabilité environnementale. 
650 7 |a Climatic changes  |x Moral and ethical aspects  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Environmental ethics  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Environmental responsibility  |2 fast 
776 |z 90-5629-553-5 
856 4 0 |u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=305725  |z Texto completo 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP