Cargando…

The interpretation of tax treaties in relation to domestic GAARs /

There are more than 3,000 tax treaties in the world, and an important question is whether these tax treaties limit a state's ability to curb undesirable tax planning by the use of domestic general anti-avoidance rules (GAARs). Many large multinational companies use essentially legitimate method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Furuseth, Eivind, 1975- (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Amsterdam, The Netherlands : IBFD, [2018]
Colección:Doctoral series ; v. 43.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 EBSCO_on1122616892
003 OCoLC
005 20231017213018.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 191008s2018 ne ob 000 0 eng d
040 |a N$T  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c N$T  |d EBLCP  |d OCL  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d K6U  |d OCLCQ 
020 |a 9789087224806  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 908722480X  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 9087224796 
020 |z 9789087224790 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000070365359 
035 |a (OCoLC)1122616892 
050 4 |a K4464  |b .F87 2018eb 
082 0 4 |a 343.04  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Furuseth, Eivind,  |d 1975-  |e author. 
245 1 4 |a The interpretation of tax treaties in relation to domestic GAARs /  |c Eivind Furuseth. 
264 1 |a Amsterdam, The Netherlands :  |b IBFD,  |c [2018] 
264 4 |c ©2018 
300 |a 1 online resource (xv, 329 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a IBFD Doctoral series,  |x 1570-7164 ;  |v volume 43 
500 |a Originally presented as the author's thesis (doctoral)--University of Oslo, 2016. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 297-329). 
520 |a There are more than 3,000 tax treaties in the world, and an important question is whether these tax treaties limit a state's ability to curb undesirable tax planning by the use of domestic general anti-avoidance rules (GAARs). Many large multinational companies use essentially legitimate methods to reduce taxes. Meanwhile, governments increasingly focus on the part of this tax planning that they view as undesirable; for example, tax planning schemes where income is shifted from one classification to another and/or shifted from one taxpayer to another. Although these transactions may be legitimate in principle, tax authorities may find that the tax planning scheme "stretches" the rules and thus wish to apply their domestic anti-avoidance rules. In order to decide whether a treaty restricts the use of domestic GAARs, the treaty must be interpreted. A basic principle in tax treaty law is that if the national rules are contrary to the treaty, the tax treaty prevails. A typical example is withholding tax on dividends: if the tax treaty provides for a lower withholding tax than what follows from domestic law, the treaty withholding tax rate prevails. A question that arises, however, is whether it is of any relevance, in terms of the relationship between tax treaties and domestic law, that the domestic tax rate is determined after the application of a domestic GAAR. This book argues that when State A and State B have agreed between themselves on how the taxation between these two countries should be shared, one of the contracting states may not, after the taxing right is shared, apply the domestic GAAR to override the tax treaty. Both domestic law and tax treaty law are under constant development. An important question is to what extent these developments affect the tax authorities' ability to counter undesirable tax planning. Is it true that tax agreements signed in recent years increasingly allow the tax authorities to apply their domestic anti-avoidance rules? This book demonstrates that it is of great importance when the tax treaty was signed for determining whether the tax authorities are restricted from using their domestic anti-avoidance rule to deny undesirable tax planning 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
505 0 |a Cover -- IBFD Doctoral Series -- Title -- Copyright -- Preface -- Abbreviations -- Part I: Introduction -- Chapter 1: Setting the Scene -- 1.1. The relationship between domestic anti-avoidance rules and tax treaties -- Chapter 2: Possible Ways of Dealing with a Potential Conflict between Domestic Anti-Avoidance Rules and Tax Treaties -- 2.1. Resolving the issue -- Chapter 3: Developing the Research Question -- 3.1. Introduction -- 3.2. Circumventing domestic legislation without benefiting from a tax treaty -- 3.3. The benefit from the transaction/arrangement follows from the tax treaty 
505 8 |a 3.3.1. Use of domestic legislation as a tool to circumvent tax treaties -- 3.3.1.1. Introduction -- 3.3.1.2. A definition in the tax treaty covers the transaction -- 3.3.1.3. No definition covering the transaction in the tax treaty -- 3.3.2. Use of a tax treaty as a tool to circumvent domestic legislation -- 3.3.2.1. Treaty shopping -- 3.3.2.2. Directive shopping -- 3.3.2.3. Back-to-back transaction -- 3.3.2.4. Other distributive rule -- 3.4. The relevance of tax treaty GAARs and/or SAARs for the application of domestic anti-avoidance rules -- Chapter 4: Outline of the Book -- 4.1. Explanation 
505 8 |a Chapter 5: Legal Sources -- 5.1. Introduction -- 5.2. OECD Comm. -- 5.3. OECD reports and other reports -- 5.4. UN Comm. as a source of law in the interpretation of tax treaties based on the OECD MC -- 5.5. Domestic case law as a source of law -- Chapter 6: Delimitations -- 6.1. Tax evasion and sham -- 6.2. EU/EEA law -- 6.3. Analysis of domestic anti-avoidance rules -- 6.4. The concept of beneficial owner -- 6.5. Formalities -- Part II: OECD and UN Documents Relevant for the Applicability of Domestic Anti-Avoidance Rules in a Tax Treaty Situation -- Chapter 7: Introduction 
505 8 |a 7.1. The relationship between domestic anti-avoidance rules and tax treaties -- Chapter 8: Historical Overview of OECD Comm. Art. 1 and UN Comm. Art. 1 -- 8.1. OECD Comm. Art. 1 -- 8.1.1. Abuse-of-treaty and domestic anti-avoidance rules -- 8.1.2. Object and purpose -- 8.1.3. Is there an inherent "guiding principle" in tax treaties? -- 8.1.4. 2003 OECD Comm. and BEPS -- 8.2. UN Comm. Art. 1 -- 8.3. Summary -- Chapter 9: Interpretation of the Treaty in its Context: The OECD Comm. and the UN Comm. -- 9.1. OECD Comm. Art. 1 views on domestic anti-avoidance rules 
505 8 |a 9.1.1. OECD Comm. Art. 1 -- In general -- 9.1.2. OECD's use of the term "facts" -- Various interpretations -- 9.1.3. The applicability of domestic anti-avoidance rules in relation to articles in the OECD MC other than OECD MC Art. 1 -- 9.1.4. The relevance of the OECD Comm. 2003 and 2017 revision for pre-2003 and pre-2017 treaties -- 9.1.4.1. Introduction -- 9.1.4.2. Changes in the Commentary relating to changes in the OECD MC -- 9.1.4.3. Changes in the Commentary without any changes in the OECD MC -- 9.2. UN Comm. Art. 1 views on domestic anti-avoidance rules -- 9.2.1. In general 
590 |a eBooks on EBSCOhost  |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide 
650 0 |a Tax evasion (International law) 
650 0 |a Double taxation  |x Treaties. 
650 0 |a Tax evasion. 
650 6 |a Fraude fiscale (Droit international) 
650 6 |a Double imposition  |x Traités. 
650 6 |a Fraude fiscale. 
650 7 |a Tax evasion.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01143749 
650 7 |a Double taxation.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00897116 
650 7 |a International business enterprises  |x Taxation  |x Law and legislation.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00976847 
650 7 |a Tax evasion (International law)  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01143767 
655 7 |a Treaties.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01423868 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Furuseth, Eivind, 1975-  |t Interpretation of tax treaties in relation to domestic GAARs.  |d Amsterdam, The Netherlands : IBFD, [2018]  |z 9087224796  |w (DLC) 2018429430  |w (OCoLC)1079844914 
830 0 |a Doctoral series ;  |v v. 43.  |x 1570-7164 
856 4 0 |u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1981869  |z Texto completo 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL6176436 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 1981869 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP