|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a22000001i 4500 |
001 |
EBSCO_on1107579964 |
003 |
OCoLC |
005 |
20231017213018.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr |n|---||||| |
008 |
190706t20192019dcu o 000 0 eng d |
040 |
|
|
|a EBLCP
|b eng
|e pn
|c EBLCP
|d CUY
|d CHVBK
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCF
|d YDX
|d OCLCQ
|d N$T
|d OCLCQ
|d SFB
|d CUS
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|
019 |
|
|
|a 1107519207
|a 1152540996
|
020 |
|
|
|a 1498317774
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9781498317771
|q (electronic bk.)
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a AU@
|b 000067149473
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a CHNEW
|b 001059354
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a CHVBK
|b 569759579
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)1107579964
|z (OCoLC)1107519207
|z (OCoLC)1152540996
|
043 |
|
|
|a n-us---
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a KF6369
|b .K677 2019
|
082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 343.73052
|2 23
|
049 |
|
|
|a UAMI
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Kopp, Emanuel,
|e author.
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a U.S. investment since the tax cuts and jobs act of 2017 /
|c by Emanuel Kopp, Daniel Leigh, Susanna Mursula, and Suchanan Tambunlertchai.
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a [Washington, D.C.] :
|b International Monetary Fund,
|c [2019]
|
264 |
|
4 |
|c ©2019
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (38 pages)
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
490 |
1 |
|
|a IMF Working Paper ;
|v WP/19/120
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a How has U.S. private investment performed since 2017? -- How much of the higher investment reflects the strength of aggregate demand? -- How has investment performed compared with the historical relation between tax cuts and investment? -- What may have held back investment?.
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a There is no consensus on how strongly the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) has stimulated U.S. private fixed investment. Some argue that the business tax provisions spurred investment by cutting the cost of capital. Others see the TCJA primarily as a windfall for shareholders. We find that U.S. business investment since 2017 has grown strongly compared to pre-TCJA forecasts and that the overriding factor driving it has been the strength of expected aggregate demand. Investment has, so far, fallen short of predictions based on the postwar relation with tax cuts. Model simulations and firm-level data suggest that much of this weaker response reflects a lower sensitivity of investment to tax policy changes in the current environment of greater corporate market power. Economic policy uncertainty in 2018 played a relatively small role in dampening investment growth.
|
588 |
0 |
|
|a Online resource; title from PDF title page (IMF, viewed Sept. 3, 2020).
|
590 |
|
|
|a eBooks on EBSCOhost
|b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Income tax
|x Law and legislation
|z United States.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Income tax
|x Law and legislation
|2 fast
|
651 |
|
7 |
|a United States
|2 fast
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Leigh, Daniel,
|e author.
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Mursula, Susanna,
|e author.
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a International Monetary Fund,
|e issuing body.
|
776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version:
|a Kopp, Emanuel.
|t U.S. Investment since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Of 2017.
|d Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, ©2019
|z 9781498317047
|
830 |
|
0 |
|a IMF working paper ;
|v WP/19/120.
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=2181258
|z Texto completo
|
938 |
|
|
|a ProQuest Ebook Central
|b EBLB
|n EBL5808076
|
938 |
|
|
|a EBSCOhost
|b EBSC
|n 2181258
|
938 |
|
|
|a YBP Library Services
|b YANK
|n 300678161
|
994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b IZTAP
|