|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a2200000Mi 4500 |
001 |
EBSCO_on1078417776 |
003 |
OCoLC |
005 |
20231017213018.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr cnu---unuuu |
008 |
181210t20192019coua ob 001 0 eng d |
040 |
|
|
|a YDX
|b eng
|e rda
|e pn
|c YDX
|d N$T
|d EBLCP
|d N$T
|d YDXIT
|d OCLCF
|d NRC
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d YDX
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|
019 |
|
|
|a 1077769880
|a 1090406358
|a 1090791204
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9781626377790
|q (electronic book)
|
020 |
|
|
|a 1626377790
|q (electronic book)
|
020 |
|
|
|z 1626377677
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9781626377677
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a AU@
|b 000065050427
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)1078417776
|z (OCoLC)1077769880
|z (OCoLC)1090406358
|z (OCoLC)1090791204
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a JC330
|b .P69 2019
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a SOC
|x 000000
|2 bisacsh
|
082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 303.3/3
|2 23
|
049 |
|
|
|a UAMI
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Power sharing and power relations after civil war /
|c edited by Caroline A. Hartzell, Andreas Mehler.
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a Boulder, Colorado :
|b Lynne Rienner Publishers,
|c 2019.
|
264 |
|
4 |
|c Ã2019
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (x, 257 pages)
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references and index.
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Intro; Title page; Copyright page; Dedication; Contents; Tables and Figures; Tables; Table 2.1 Descriptive Statistics for Practices of Power Sharing; Table 2.2 Competing-Risks Coefficients for Transition to Nonviolent Power Relations; Table 2.3 Competing-Risks Coefficients for Transition to Inclusive Power Relation; Table 2.4 Competing-Risks Regression with Independent Variables Interactedwith Time; Table 2.5 Results of Endogeneity Test for Power-Sharing Practices; Table 2.6 Comparison of Hypotheses and Empirical Finding; Table 3.1 List of Fifty-Two Cases of Rebel Parties
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a Table 3.2 Hazard Ratios for Rebel Party Splits After End of Civil WarTable 3.3 Hazard Ratios for Rebel Party Splits After End of Civil War, Peace Agreement Cases; Table 4.1 Effects of Power-Sharing Properties Down to the Local Level; Table 6.1 Effects of Concession on Group Fragmentation; Table 6.2 Fate of Inactive Factions Five Years After Concessions; Table 8.1 Post-Civil War Power Sharing and Government Respect for Physical Integrity Rights, Aggregate Measure, 1984-2006
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a Table 8.2 Post-Civil War Power Sharing and Government Respect for Physical Integrity Rights, Individual Measures, 1984-2006Table 9.1 Consociational Forms of Governance in Northern Ireland and Lebanon; Table 9.2 Religious Affiliation in Northern Ireland and Lebanon (in percentage); Table 9.3 Religious Affiliation, Behavior, and Conviction in Northern Ireland and Lebanon; Table 9.4 Attitudes Toward Religious Intermarriage in Northern Ireland(percentage); Table 9.5 Religious Affiliation and Obstacles to Interfaith Marriage AmongFamily Members in Lebanon (percentage)
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a Table 9.6 Religious Denomination and Attitudes Toward Intermarriage Among Other Ethnic and Religious Groups in Northern IrelandTable 9.7 Religious Affiliation and Perceived Obstacles to Marriage Among Family Members from a Different Religion and from Other Social Groups inLebanon; Table 10.1 Transitional Justice, Power Sharing, and Power Relations; Figures; Figure 2.1 Stacked Cumulative Incidence of Government-Rebel Relations for Different Power-Sharing Settings; Figure 3.1 Party Split Hazard over Time; Figure 3.2 Party Split Hazard over Time, Peace Agreements Only
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a Figure 6.1 Fragmentation of Self-Determination (SD) MovementsFigure 7.1 Power Distribution by Socioeconomic Position and Social Group in Burundi; Figure 7.2 Power Distribution by Socioeconomic Position and Social Group in Liberia; Figure 7.3 Power Distribution by Socioeconomic Position and Social Group in Republic of the Congo; Figure 7.4 Power Distribution by Socioeconomic Position and Social Group in Uganda; Figure 7.5 Power Distribution by Socioeconomic Position and Social Group in Sierra Leone; Figure 7.6 Power Distribution by Socioeconomic Position and Social Group in South Africa
|
520 |
|
|
|a There are numerous studies on the role of power-sharing agreements in the maintenance of peace in postconflict states. Less explored, however, is the impact of power sharing on the quality of the peace. Do power-sharing institutions in fact transform the balance of power among actors in the aftermath of civil wars? And if so, how? As they address these issues, seeking to establish a new research agenda, the authors provide a rich new analytical approach to understanding how power sharing actually works.
|
588 |
0 |
|
|a Online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on February 19, 2019).
|
590 |
|
|
|a eBooks on EBSCOhost
|b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Power (Social sciences)
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Peace-building.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Civil war.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Pouvoir (Sciences sociales)
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Consolidation de la paix.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Guerre civile.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a civil wars.
|2 aat
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a SOCIAL SCIENCE
|x General.
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Civil war
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Peace-building
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Power (Social sciences)
|2 fast
|
650 |
1 |
7 |
|a Government and political science.
|2 scgdst
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Hartzell, Caroline A.,
|e editor.
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Mehler, Andreas,
|e editor.
|
776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version:
|t Power sharing and power relations after civil war.
|d Boulder, Colorado : Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2019
|z 1626377677
|z 9781626377677
|w (OCoLC)1048934463
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1949697
|z Texto completo
|
938 |
|
|
|a ProQuest Ebook Central
|b EBLB
|n EBL5607355
|
938 |
|
|
|a EBSCOhost
|b EBSC
|n 1949697
|
938 |
|
|
|a YBP Library Services
|b YANK
|n 15874955
|
994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b IZTAP
|