Cargando…
The Origin of Oughtness : a Case for Metaethical Conativism /
How come we ought to do things? Current metanormative debates often suffer from the fact that authors implicitly use adequacy conditions not shared by their opponents. This leads to an unsatisfying dialectical gridlock (Chang): One author accuses her opponents of not being able to account for stuff...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Berlin ; Boston :
De Gruyter,
[2018]
|
| Colección: | Practical Philosophy ;
volume 22 |
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000Mi 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | EBSCO_on1049627104 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20231017213018.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr ||||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 180821t20182018gw fob z001 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a DEGRU |b eng |e rda |e pn |c DEGRU |d YDX |d N$T |d EBLCP |d OCLCF |d YDX |d OCLCQ |d UKAHL |d OCLCQ |d K6U |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d DEGRU | ||
| 019 | |a 1048944897 |a 1049858992 | ||
| 020 | |a 9783110599855 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 3110599856 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9783110599787 |q (electronic book) | ||
| 020 | |a 3110599783 |q (electronic book) | ||
| 020 | |z 9783110599251 | ||
| 020 | |z 3110599252 | ||
| 020 | |z 3110600722 | ||
| 020 | |z 9783110600728 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/9783110599787 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1049627104 |z (OCoLC)1048944897 |z (OCoLC)1049858992 | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a BJ1012 |b .F57 2018 | |
| 072 | 7 | |a PHI005000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a PHI016000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a PHI |x 009000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a PHI |x 016000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 170 |2 23 |
| 049 | |a UAMI | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Fischer, Stefan, |e author. | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Origin of Oughtness : |b a Case for Metaethical Conativism / |c Stefan Fischer. |
| 264 | 1 | |a Berlin ; |a Boston : |b De Gruyter, |c [2018] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©2018 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (297 pages) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 347 | |a text file |b PDF |2 rda | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Practical Philosophy ; |v volume 22 | |
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 | 0 | |t Frontmatter -- |t Preface and acknowledgments -- |t Contents -- |t Part i: the phenomenon and how to explain it -- |t 1 the phenomenon of oughtness -- |t 2 the grounds for explaining oughtness -- |t 3 two angles and a dialectical dead end -- |t Part ii: four theories of oughtness -- |t 4 stemmer's humean theory of oughtness -- |t 5 halbig's value realism -- |t 6 schroeder's hypotheticalism -- |t 7 scanlon's reasons fundamentalism -- |t 8 why humeanism 'wins' -- |t Part iii: constructing conativism -- |t 9 a look ahead -- |t 10 an anthropological framework for humeanism -- |t 11 the argument from favored desires -- |t 12 the nature of desiring -- |t 13 promoting desires -- |t 14 idealization, epistemic error, and autonomy -- |t 15 the nature of practical reasons -- |t 16 the weight of favorings -- |t 17 conativism and the morality angle -- |t 18 the origin of oughtness: a recapitulation -- |t Bibliography -- |t Index. |
| 520 | |a How come we ought to do things? Current metanormative debates often suffer from the fact that authors implicitly use adequacy conditions not shared by their opponents. This leads to an unsatisfying dialectical gridlock (Chang): One author accuses her opponents of not being able to account for stuff she judges essential, but the opponents do not think this to be a major flaw. In an attempt to meet the problem of gridlock head-on, the current investigation approaches oughtness differently. I start with the introduction of a grounding framework for thinking about oughtness that allows a lucid presentation of the views on the market. It soon becomes clear that one necessary part of any plausible assessment of accounts of oughtness is a discussion of their adequacy conditions. I continue with a detailed evaluation of four different accounts, as presented by Halbig (2007), Schroeder (2007), Stemmer (2006), and Scanlon (2014). My main result is that desire-based or Humean theories of oughtness are more plausible because desire-independent accounts fail to explain something crucial: the for-me character of oughtness. Based on the insights gathered thus far, I then develop a new Humean theory - metaethical conativism - and defend it against some historically influential objections. | ||
| 546 | |a In English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 21. Aug 2018). | |
| 590 | |a eBooks on EBSCOhost |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Metaethics. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Métaéthique. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a PHILOSOPHY |x History & Surveys |x General. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a PHILOSOPHY |x History & Surveys |x Modern. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Metaethics. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst01894559 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |z 9783110599251 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |z 9783110600728 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1868109 |z Texto completo |
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH34024048 | ||
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH36184667 | ||
| 938 | |a De Gruyter |b DEGR |n 9783110599787 | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest Ebook Central |b EBLB |n EBL5521650 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 1868109 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 15647293 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 15146785 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b IZTAP | ||