Cargando…

Disorder in the court : morality, myth, and the insanity defense /

"The first book-length rhetorical history and analysis of the insanity defense. The insanity defense is considered one of the most controversial, most misunderstood, and least straightforward subjects in the American legal system. Disorder in the Court: Morality, Myth, and the Insanity Defense...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Alden, Andrea L., 1977- (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Tuscaloosa, Alabama : University of Alabama Press, [2018]
Colección:Rhetoric, law, and the humanities.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 EBSCO_on1048003876
003 OCoLC
005 20231017213018.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 180808s2018 alu obv s001 0 eng d
040 |a N$T  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c N$T  |d N$T  |d P@U  |d EBLCP  |d YDX  |d UAB  |d MERUC  |d OCLCQ  |d OTZ  |d OL$  |d UKAHL  |d OCLCQ  |d K6U  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ 
020 |a 9780817391638  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 0817391630  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 9780817319724 
020 |z 0817319727 
020 |z 0817391630 
029 1 |a CHNEW  |b 001024218 
029 1 |a CHVBK  |b 530305283 
035 |a (OCoLC)1048003876 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 4 |a KF9242  |b .A75 2018eb 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 026000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 345.73/04  |2 23 
084 |a LAW067000  |a LAN015000  |2 bisacsh 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Alden, Andrea L.,  |d 1977-  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Disorder in the court :  |b morality, myth, and the insanity defense /  |c Andrea L. Alden. 
264 1 |a Tuscaloosa, Alabama :  |b University of Alabama Press,  |c [2018] 
264 4 |c ©2018 
300 |a 1 online resource (x, 197 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Rhetoric, law, and the humanities 
520 |a "The first book-length rhetorical history and analysis of the insanity defense. The insanity defense is considered one of the most controversial, most misunderstood, and least straightforward subjects in the American legal system. Disorder in the Court: Morality, Myth, and the Insanity Defense traces the US legal standards for the insanity defense as they have evolved from 1843, when they were first codified in England, to 1984, when the US government attempted to revise them through the Insanity Defense Reform Act. Throughout this period "insanity" existed primarily as a legal term rather than a medical one; yet the testimony of psychiatric experts is required in cases in which an insanity defense is raised. The adjudication of such cases by courtroom practice is caught between two different but overlapping discourses, the legal and the medical, both of which have historically sought to assert and maintain firm disciplinary boundaries. Both expert and lay audiences have struggled to understand and apply commonplace definitions of sanity, and the portrayal of the insanity defense in popular culture has only served to further frustrate such understandings. Andrea L. Alden argues that the problems with understanding the insanity defense are, at their foundation, rhetorical. The legal concept of what constitutes insanity and, therefore, an abdication of responsibility for one's actions does not map neatly onto the mental health professions' understandings of mental illness and how that affects an individual's ability to understand or control his or her actions. Additionally, there are multiple layers of persuasion involved in any effort to convince a judge, jury--or a public, for that matter--that a defendant is or is not responsible for his or her actions at a particular moment in time. Alden examines landmark court cases such as the trial of Daniel McNaughtan, Durham v. United States, and the trial of John Hinckley Jr. that signal the major shifts in the legal definitions of the insanity defense. Combining archival, textual, and rhetorical analysis, Alden offers a close reading of texts including trial transcripts, appellate court opinions, and relevant medical literature from the time period. She contextualizes these analyses through popular texts--for example, newspaper articles and editorials--showing that while all societies have maintained some version of mental illness as a mitigating factor in their penal systems, the insanity defense has always been fraught with controversy"--  |c Provided by publisher 
520 |a "The insanity defense is considered one of the most controversial, most misunderstood, and least straightforward subjects in the American legal system. Disorder in the Court: Morality, Myth, and the Insanity Defense traces the US legal standards for the insanity defense as they have evolved from 1843, when they were first codified in England, to 1984, when the US government attempted to revise them through the Insanity Defense Reform Act. Throughout this period "insanity" existed primarily as a legal term rather than a medical one; yet the testimony of psychiatric experts is required in cases in which an insanity defense is raised"--  |c Provided by publisher 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
588 0 |a Online resource; title from PDF title page (EBSCO, viewed August 8, 2018). 
505 0 |a Intro; Contents; Acknowledgments; Introduction: Reasoning with Madness; 1. Framing the Issue: What Rhetoric Can Offer to the Conversation; 2. A Brief History of Western Thought on Mental Illness and Its Relevance to the Law; 3. Knowing Right from Wrong: The Trial of Daniel McNaughtan; 4. Late Nineteenth-Century Insanity Defense Jurisprudence: Parsons, Davis, and the "Irresistible Impulse" Test; 5. Mid-Twentieth-Century Insanity Defense Jurisprudence: Durham v. United States and the "Product" Test. 
505 8 |a 6. Late Twentieth-Century Insanity Defense Jurisprudence: The Trial of John Hinckley Jr. and the Insanity Defense Reform ActConclusion. The Insanity Defense Since Hinckley; Appendix 1. Parsons v. State; Appendix 2. Davis v. United States; Appendix 3. Durham v. United States; Appendix 4. Hinckley Letter to Jodie Foster; Notes; Bibliography; Index. 
590 |a eBooks on EBSCOhost  |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide 
650 0 |a Insanity (Law)  |z United States  |x History. 
650 0 |a Insanity (Law)  |z United States  |v Cases. 
650 0 |a Insanity defense  |z United States  |x History. 
650 0 |a Forensic psychiatry  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Mental health laws  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Law  |z United States  |x Psychological aspects. 
650 6 |a Défense d'aliénation mentale  |z États-Unis  |x Histoire. 
650 6 |a Droit  |z États-Unis  |x Aspect psychologique. 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Mental Health.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES  |x Rhetoric.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Criminal Law  |x General.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Forensic psychiatry.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00932002 
650 7 |a Insanity defense.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01743092 
650 7 |a Insanity (Law)  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01715759 
650 7 |a Law  |x Psychological aspects.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00993801 
650 7 |a Mental health laws.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01016447 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
655 7 |a History.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01411628 
655 7 |a Trials, litigation, etc.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01423712 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Alden, Andrea L., 1977-  |t Disorder in the court.  |d Tuscaloosa, Alabama : University of Alabama Press, [2018]  |w (DLC) 2017060818 
830 0 |a Rhetoric, law, and the humanities. 
856 4 0 |u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1823602  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH35084920 
938 |a EBL - Ebook Library  |b EBLB  |n EBL5488461 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 1823602 
938 |a Project MUSE  |b MUSE  |n muse66460 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 15632543 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP