Cargando…

Lexical meaning as a testable hypothesis : the case of English look, see, seem and appear /

This book offers an original treatment of the lexical form look. The work is innovative in that it establishes that the Columbia School conception of an invariant meaning - hitherto found primarily in grammar - is equally operative in core vocabulary items like look and see. The upshot is that gramm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Sabar, Nadav (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Amsterdam ; Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2018.
Colección:Studies in functional and structural linguistics ; Volume 75.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 EBSCO_on1019840576
003 OCoLC
005 20231017213018.0
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 180108s2018 ne ob 001 0 eng
010 |a  2018000707 
040 |a DLC  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c DLC  |d OCLCF  |d N$T  |d YDX  |d DLC  |d EBLCP  |d OCLCQ  |d NRC  |d EZ9  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d U3W  |d UKAHL  |d K6U  |d VLY  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ 
020 |a 9789027264343  |q (pdf) 
020 |a 9027264341 
020 |z 9789027200426  |q (hb ;  |q alk. paper) 
035 |a (OCoLC)1019840576 
042 |a pcc 
050 0 0 |a P126 
072 7 |a LAN  |x 006000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAN  |x 009060  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 0 |a 415.01/8234  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Sabar, Nadav,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Lexical meaning as a testable hypothesis :  |b the case of English look, see, seem and appear /  |c Nadav Sabar. 
264 1 |a Amsterdam ;  |a Philadelphia :  |b John Benjamins Publishing Company,  |c 2018. 
300 |a 1 online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Studies in functional and structural linguistics ;  |v Volume 75 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
588 0 |a Print version record and CIP data provided by publisher. 
505 0 |a Intro; Lexical meaning as a testable hypothesis; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Acknowledgements; List of tables; List of figures; 1. The problem, methodology and theoretical background; 1. Introduction; 2. The problem of the identification of linguistic units; 2.1 The problem of identifying linguistic units based on syntactic categories; 2.2 The problem of identifying linguistic units based on cognitive status; 2.2.1 The problem of stored sequences; 2.2.2 The problem of polysemy; 3. Methodology; 3.1 Qualitative support; 3.2 Quantitative support. 
505 8 |a 4. Preview of upcoming chapters2. attention, visual as the explanation for the choice of look; 1. Introduction; 2. The fit with messages involving acts of visual attention; 3. The fit with messages where a visual stimulus is absent; 4. The fit with messages involving the communication of one's thoughts or feelings; 5. The fit with messages involving attention-grabbing visual features; 6. The fit with messages involving attribution based on visual attention; 7. The fit with messages involving either visual or intellectual attention; 8. The fit with messages of searching. 
505 8 |a 9. Look in combination with directional terms: up, down, forward, back and after10. Conclusion; 3. Using big data to support the hypothesized meaning attention, visual; 1. Introduction; 2. Methodology; 2.1 Quantitative predictions test the generality of communicative strategies; 2.2 Justification of the inductive approach; 3. Supporting attention in the meaning of look; 3.1 Using carefully to support attention; 3.2 Using this to support attention; 3.3 Using but to support attention; 3.4 Using at to support attention; 3.5 Using deliberately to support attention. 
505 8 |a 3.6 Using think to support attention4. Supporting visual in the meaning of look; 4.1 Using eye to support visual; 4.2 Using painting to support visual; 4.3 Using see to support visual; 5. Conclusion; 4. attention, visual in competition with the meanings of see, seem, and appear; 1. Introduction; 2. Look and see -- attention, visual versus experiencing visually; 2.1 The hypothesis for see as a monosemic sign; 2.2 attention as the explanation for the choice of look over see; 2.2.1 Using turn to to support attention; 2.2.2 Using notice to support attention. 
505 8 |a 2.3 experiencing as the explanation for the choice of see over look2.3.1 Using believe to support experiencing; 2.3.2 Using understand to support experiencing; 2.3.3 Using less control to support experiencing; 3. Look and seem -- attention, visual versus perspective dependency; 3.1 The hypothesis for seem as a monosemic sign; 3.2 visual as the explanation for the choice of look over seem; 3.2.1 Using green to support visual; 3.3 perspective dependency as the explanation for the choice of seem over look; 3.3.1 Using logical to support perspective; 3.3.2 Using to me to support perspective. 
520 |a This book offers an original treatment of the lexical form look. The work is innovative in that it establishes that the Columbia School conception of an invariant meaning - hitherto found primarily in grammar - is equally operative in core vocabulary items like look and see. The upshot is that grammar and lexicon are both amenable to synchronic monosemic analysis. The invariant meaning proposed for look explains the full range of its distribution, without the need to posit as linguistic units 'look-noun' and 'look-verb', 'look-visual' and 'look-intellectual', or constructions such as have-a-look, look-like, etc. The analysis places look in opposition with see, seem and appear for which tentative meanings are posited as well. The hypotheses are supported through qualitative analyses of attested examples and quantitative predictions tested in a massive corpus. These predictions offer new knowledge about the distribution of look, see and other forms that may provide useful for other scholars. 
590 |a eBooks on EBSCOhost  |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide 
650 0 |a Linguistic analysis (Linguistics) 
650 0 |a Functionalism (Linguistics) 
650 0 |a English language  |x Semantics. 
650 6 |a Analyse linguistique (Linguistique) 
650 6 |a Fonctionnalisme (Linguistique) 
650 7 |a LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES  |x Grammar & Punctuation.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES  |x Linguistics  |x Syntax.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a English language  |x Semantics.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00911631 
650 7 |a Functionalism (Linguistics)  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00936095 
650 7 |a Linguistic analysis (Linguistics)  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00999166 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Sabar, Nadav author.  |t Lexical meaning as a testable hypothesis.  |d Amsterdam ; Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2018  |z 9789027200426  |w (DLC) 2017056558 
830 0 |a Studies in functional and structural linguistics ;  |v Volume 75. 
856 4 0 |u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1775012  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH33728264 
938 |a EBL - Ebook Library  |b EBLB  |n EBL5341963 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 1775012 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 15260456 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP