Cargando…

Scalia v. Scalia : opportunistic textualism in constitutional interpretation /

Scalia v. Scalia:Opportunistic Textualism in Constitutional Interpretation examines Scalia's discussions of textualism in his speeches, extrajudicial writings, and judicial opinions. Throughout his writings, Scalia argues textualism is the only acceptable form of constitutional interpretation....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Langford, Catherine L., 1974- (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Tuscaloosa : The University of Alabama Press, [2017]
Colección:Rhetoric, law, and the humanities.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 EBSCO_on1017736999
003 OCoLC
005 20231017213018.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 180103s2017 alu ob 001 0 eng d
040 |a N$T  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c N$T  |d YDX  |d BOL  |d OCLCF  |d STF  |d AGLDB  |d G3B  |d IGB  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCA  |d OCL 
020 |a 9780817391607  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 0817391606  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 9780817319700 
020 |z 0817319700 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000062578052 
035 |a (OCoLC)1017736999 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 4 |a KF8745.S33  |b L36 2017eb 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 018000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 075000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 342.73001  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Langford, Catherine L.,  |d 1974-  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Scalia v. Scalia :  |b opportunistic textualism in constitutional interpretation /  |c Catherine L. Langford. 
246 3 |a Scalia versus Scalia 
264 1 |a Tuscaloosa :  |b The University of Alabama Press,  |c [2017] 
300 |a 1 online resource (xi, 162 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Rhetoric, law, and the humanities 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
520 |a Scalia v. Scalia:Opportunistic Textualism in Constitutional Interpretation examines Scalia's discussions of textualism in his speeches, extrajudicial writings, and judicial opinions. Throughout his writings, Scalia argues textualism is the only acceptable form of constitutional interpretation. Yet Scalia does not clearly define his textualism, nor does he always rely upon textualism to the exclusion of other interpretive means. Scalia is seen as the standard bearer for textualism. But when textualism fails to support his ideological aims (as in cases that pertain to states' rights or separation of powers), Scalia reverts to other forms of argumentation. Langford analyzes Scalia's opinions in a clear area of law, the cruel and unusual punishment clause; a contested area of law, the free exercise and establishment cases; and a silent area of law, abortion. Through her analysis, Langford shows that Scalia uses rhetorical strategies beyond those of a textualist approach, concluding that Scalia is an opportunistic textualist and that textualism is as rhetorical as any other form of judicial interpretation. 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
590 |a eBooks on EBSCOhost  |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide 
600 1 0 |a Scalia, Antonin,  |d 1936-2016. 
600 1 7 |a Scalia, Antonin,  |d 1936-2016  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00184458 
650 0 |a Constitutional law  |z United States  |x Philosophy. 
650 0 |a Constitutional law  |z United States  |x Interpretation and construction. 
650 7 |a Constitutional law.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00875797 
650 7 |a Constitutional law  |x Philosophy.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00875821 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Langford, Catherine L., 1974-  |t Scalia v. Scalia.  |d Tuscaloosa : The University of Alabama Press, [2017]  |z 9780817319700  |w (DLC) 2017020442  |w (OCoLC)986788680 
830 0 |a Rhetoric, law, and the humanities. 
856 4 0 |u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1616318  |z Texto completo 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 1616318 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 15067698 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP