Cargando…

Quarterly Review of Distance Education. Volume 18, no. 2 /

Of ANOVA on Team Scores for Task Type3; 7.289; 0.135; 0.939; 80; 54.180; 3; 64.363; 2.122; 0.104; 80; 30.328; 217.276; 3; 72.425; 2.126; 0.103; 80; 34.066; Table 6; Lower Bias Compared to Higher Bias Team Personality by Task; RECOMMENDATIONS; LIMITATIONS; REFERENCES; APPENDIX A; Week 1: Team Memo As...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Otros Autores: Schlosser, Charles
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Charlotte, NC : Information Age Publishing, 2017.
Colección:Quarterly Review of Distance Education Journal.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Mi 4500
001 EBSCO_on1012881707
003 OCoLC
005 20231017213018.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|---|||||
008 171125s2017 ncu o 000 0 eng d
040 |a EBLCP  |b eng  |e pn  |c EBLCP  |d OCLCQ  |d YDX  |d N$T  |d IDB  |d OCLCO  |d N$T  |d OCLCF  |d EBLCP  |d OCLCQ  |d K6U  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ 
019 |a 1012342950 
020 |a 9781641130929  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 164113092X  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 1641130911 
020 |z 9781641130912 
029 1 |a CHNEW  |b 000986641 
029 1 |a CHVBK  |b 509395589 
029 1 |a GBVCP  |b 1015962092 
035 |a (OCoLC)1012881707  |z (OCoLC)1012342950 
050 4 |a LC5800  |b .Q378 2017eb 
072 7 |a EDU  |x 041000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 371.35  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
245 0 0 |a Quarterly Review of Distance Education.  |n Volume 18, no. 2 /  |c editors Michael Simonson, Charles Schlosser. 
260 |a Charlotte, NC :  |b Information Age Publishing,  |c 2017. 
300 |a 1 online resource (112 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Quarterly Review of Distance Education Journal 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
505 0 |a Front Cover; Statement of Purpose; Quarterly Review of Distance Education; â#x80;#x9C;Research That Guides Practiceâ#x80;#x9D;; Volume 18, Number 2, 2017; ARTICLES; Quarterly Review of Distance Education Editors and Editorial Board; Editors; Assistant Editor; Editorial Assistant; Department Editors; International; Ray J. Amirault, Illinois State University Yusra Laila Visser, Illinois State University; Michelle Rogers-Estable, SUNY Delhi; Editorial Board; Global Standards for Enhancing Quality in Online Learning; Florence Martin and Drew Polly; University of North Carolina Charlotte. 
505 8 |a Annika Jokiaho and Birgit MayLudwigsburg University of Education; The quality of online courses offered has been a topic of discussion in the recent years, and efforts have been taken to establish standards for developing online courses. In this study, the authors review 12 online learning standard documents and ex ... ; INTRODUCTION; ONLINE LEARNING STANDARDS; Purpose of This Study; 1. What are some of the global standard models that focus on enhancing quality in online learning and how many sections and standards are included in each of these standard models? 
505 8 |a 2. What are the common elements (i.e., most and least emphasized, similarities and differences) of global standards related to online learning?METHOD; Data Sources; 1. Quality on the Line: Benchmarks for Success in Internet Based Distance Education; 2. Online Learning Consortium Quality Scorecard, 2005; 3. Blackboard Exemplary Course Rubric, 2000; 4. Quality Matters 2014, 5th Edition; 5. CHEA Institute for Research and Study of Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2002; 6. Open eQuality Learning Standards, 2004; 7. NADEOSA (South Africa) 2005 revision of 1996 document. 
505 8 |a 8. ACODE (Australia) 2014 revision of 2007 document9. Asian Association of Open Universities, no date; 10. ECBCheck 2012; 11. UNIQUe 2011; 12. International Organization for Standardization (ISO); Procedure; Data Analysis; RESULTS; DISCUSSION; Table 1; Standard Details; 7; 24; 4; 25; 8; 75; 4; 17; 8; 45; 7; 7; 13; 184; 8; 64; 10; 54; 13; 46; 10; 71; 7; 38; 8.25; 54.16; Table 2; Codes From Standard Analysis; 164; 115; 102; 77; 47; 45; 40; 33; 27; 650; Selection of the 12 Global Standard Documents; Differences in the Documents; Most-Emphasized Standards; Least-Emphasized Standards. 
505 8 |a Similarities and DifferencesImplications for Future Research and the Improvement of Practice; CONCLUSION; REFERENCES; Designing for Quality; An Analysis of Design and Pedagogical Issues in Online Course Development; Mapopa William Sanga; Southwestern Oklahoma State University; This study investigated the process through which 100 online courses were developed in compliance with a purpose-made rubric designed to bring the courses to a level that would meet requirements of membership in a state authorization reciprocity agre ... ; INTRODUCTION; QUALITY IN ONLINE LEARNING. 
500 |a STATE AUTHORIZATION RECIPROCITY AGREEMENT. 
520 |a Of ANOVA on Team Scores for Task Type3; 7.289; 0.135; 0.939; 80; 54.180; 3; 64.363; 2.122; 0.104; 80; 30.328; 217.276; 3; 72.425; 2.126; 0.103; 80; 34.066; Table 6; Lower Bias Compared to Higher Bias Team Personality by Task; RECOMMENDATIONS; LIMITATIONS; REFERENCES; APPENDIX A; Week 1: Team Memo Assignment; APPENDIX B; Week 5; Marketplace Simulation Student Instructions. 
590 |a eBooks on EBSCOhost  |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide 
650 0 |a Distance education. 
650 6 |a Enseignement à distance. 
650 7 |a EDUCATION  |x Distance, Open & Online Education.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Distance education.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00895456 
700 1 |a Schlosser, Charles. 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Simonson, Michael.  |t Quarterly Review of Distance Education : Volume 18 #2.  |d Charlotte, NC : Information Age Publishing, ©2017  |z 9781641130912 
830 0 |a Quarterly Review of Distance Education Journal. 
856 4 0 |u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1632267  |z Texto completo 
938 |a EBL - Ebook Library  |b EBLB  |n EBL5430292 
938 |a EBL - Ebook Library  |b EBLB  |n EBL5149539 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 1632267 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 14983168 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP