Cargando…

Constitutional argument and institutional structure in the United States /

US constitutional jurisprudence often conflates two distinct enquiries: how to interpret the Constitution and how to allocate interpretive authority. This book explains the distinct role of judgements about interpretive authority in constitutional practice. It argues that these judgements do not det...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Papaspyrou, Nicholas (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Oxford, UK ; Portland, Oregon : Hart Publishing, Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 2018.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 EBSCO_on1008774224
003 OCoLC
005 20231017213018.0
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 171024t20182018enk ob 001 0 eng
010 |a  2017051418 
040 |a DLC  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c DLC  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCF  |d N$T  |d OCLCQ  |d YDX  |d UAB  |d YDX  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d BLOOM  |d EBLCP  |d CLU  |d OTZ  |d UKMGB  |d U3W  |d FIE  |d UKAHL  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ 
015 |a GBB870433  |2 bnb 
016 7 |a 018833246  |2 Uk 
019 |a 1029487155 
020 |a 9781509917181  |q (electronic book) 
020 |a 1509917187  |q (electronic book) 
020 |a 9781509917204 
020 |a 1509917209 
020 |z 9781509917198 
020 |z 1509917195 
020 |z 9781509917174  |q (hardcover ;  |q alkaline paper) 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000065052356 
029 1 |a UKMGB  |b 018833246 
035 |a (OCoLC)1008774224  |z (OCoLC)1029487155 
037 |a 9781509917198  |b CodeMantra 
042 |a pcc 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 1 4 |a KF4552  |b .P37 2018 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 018000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 075000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 0 |a 342.73  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Papaspyrou, Nicholas,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Constitutional argument and institutional structure in the United States /  |c Nicholas Papaspyrou. 
264 1 |a Oxford, UK ;  |a Portland, Oregon :  |b Hart Publishing, Bloomsbury Publishing Plc,  |c 2018. 
264 4 |c ©2018 
300 |a 1 online resource (xxviii, 270 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
505 0 |a Textual primacy and precedential force : the institutional anchorage of -- Constitutional law -- The authority of constitutional law -- Constitutional interpretation as a distinctive kind of practical -- Reasoning -- Constitutional constructivism and practical deliberation -- The pursuit of political justice -- The justification of institutional norms -- The operation and the dynamics of institutional norms -- Functional analysis and institutional checks -- Democracy and institutional design -- Democracy and judicial review -- The province and duty of the judicial department -- The subtlety of constitutional doctrine -- The claim to judicial supremacy -- Constitutional sensibilities. 
588 0 |a Online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on April 16, 2018). 
520 8 |a US constitutional jurisprudence often conflates two distinct enquiries: how to interpret the Constitution and how to allocate interpretive authority. This book explains the distinct role of judgements about interpretive authority in constitutional practice. It argues that these judgements do not determine what qualifies as good constitutional argument, and cannot substitute for it. Rather, they specify the division of labour between the political branches and the judiciary in forming applicable constitutional determinations. This explanation of the structure of constitutional reasoning sets the stage for the development of a normative theory about each enquiry. The book advances a theory of substantive constitutional argument. It argues that constitutional interpretation is a special kind of practical reasoning, aiming to construct and specify morally sound accounts of the Constitution and surrounding constitutional practice. Yet, this task is entrusted to a scheme of institutions, as agents of free and equal citizens. The standard of review is an interlocking component of that scheme, regulating the judicial assignment. As such, it should aim to facilitate best performance of the overall interpretive task, so that the judicial process settles on appropriate constitutional determinations; grounded on morally sound reasons that reach all citizens and uphold the fundamental commitments to freedom and equal citizenship. 
590 |a eBooks on EBSCOhost  |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide 
650 0 |a Constitutional law  |z United States  |x Interpretation and construction. 
650 0 |a Constitutional law  |z United States  |x Philosophy. 
650 0 |a Federal government  |z United States. 
650 0 |a State, The. 
650 0 |a Separation of powers  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Democracy  |z United States. 
650 6 |a État. 
650 6 |a Séparation des pouvoirs  |z États-Unis. 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Constitutional.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Public.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Constitutional law.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00875797 
650 7 |a Constitutional law  |x Philosophy.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00875821 
650 7 |a Democracy.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00890077 
650 7 |a Federal government.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00922333 
650 7 |a Separation of powers.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01112740 
650 7 |a State, The.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01131943 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Papaspyrou, Nicholas.  |t Constitutional argument and institutional structure in the United States.  |d Oxford ; New York : Hart, 2018  |z 9781509917174  |w (DLC) 2017051101  |w (OCoLC)1008769424 
856 4 0 |u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1731668  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH34100184 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH34082120 
938 |a Bloomsbury Publishing  |b BLOO  |n bpp09261637 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL5321257 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 1731668 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 15221005 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP