Cargando…
A Malaysian study of mixed methods : an example of integrating quantitative and qualitative methods /
This book consists of ten chapters, focusing on how to combine quantitative with qualitative methods in a research project. The approach of combining both methods is called 'Triangulation'. In the social sciences, triangulation is often used in combining several research methods to study o...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Newcastle upon Tyne :
Cambridge Scholars Publishing,
2016.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Table of Contents; Acronyms; Foreword; Chapter One; Chapter Two; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 Disaster Studies and Planning; 2.3 Research in Disaster Planning; 2.4 Disaster Planning Principles; 2.5 Roles of Government; 2.6 Learning from Imperfections of Disaster Planning; 2.7 New Emergency Management Model; 2.8 Potential Risks of Post-Disaster Recovery; 2.9 Conclusion; Chapter Three; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 Regulatory Compliance; 3.3 Research in Regulatory Compliance; 3.4 Compliance Assessment to International Standards; 3.5 Enforcement of Disaster Planning Framework
- 3.6 International Legal Context in Shelter/Housing Sector3.7 Community Participations; 3.8 Behaviours of Government Institutions in Disaster Planning; 3.9 Conclusion; Chapter Four; 4.1 Introduction; 4.2 Quality of Public Service Administration; 4.3 Malaysia and Asia; 4.4 Malaysian Experience; 4.5 Evolution of Disaster Planning in Malaysia; 4.6 National Housing Rights Legislations; 4.7 Emergency Housing in Malaysia; 4.8 Lesson Learned from Disaster Cases in Housing; 4.9 Conclusion; Chapter Five; 5.1 Introduction; 5.2 Statement of the Problem; 5.3 Objective of the Study; 5.4 Originality/Value
- 5.5 Assumptions5.6 The Importance of the Study; 5.7 Contributions; 5.8 Limitation; 5.9 Regulated Population to Justify Biographical Data; 5.10 Research Approach; 5.11 Relevance of the Three-Component Model of Attitudes on Regulatory Compliance; 5.12 Research Aims; 5.13 Core Hypothesis; 5.14 Specific Research Questions for the Interviews; 5.15 Conclusion and Methodological Caveats; Chapter Six; 6.1 Research Design; 6.2 The Relationship between Qualitative and Quantitative Method in This Study; 6.3 Questionnaire and Interviews; 6.4 Quantitative Method: The Survey
- 6.5 Qualitative Method: Interviews6.6 Research Strategies; 6.7 Approaches to Verification and Standards of Quality; 6.8 Research Credibility; 6.9 Reliability and Validity of the Qualitative and Quantitative Research; Chapter Seven; 7.1 Introduction; 7.2 Actors' Cognitive Component of Attitudes to Regulatory Compliance; 7.3 Actors' Affective Component of Attitudes to Regulatory Compliance; 7.4 Actors' Conative Component of Attitudes to Regulatory Compliance; 7.5 General Attitudes of Actors towards Regulatory Compliance Implementation
- 7.6 Relationship between the Actors' Three Components of Attitudes (cognitive, affective and conative) towards Regulatory Compliance7.7 Relationship between the Actors' Perceived Ability to Apply (K2) to the Affective Component of Attitudes (Section B) and Willingness to Support the Implementation of Regulatory Compliance (item 31); 7.8 Open-Ended Items; 7.9 Conclusion; Chapter Eight; 8.1 Introduction; 8.2 Cognitive Component of Attitudes to Regulatory Compliance; 8.3 Affective Component of Attitudes; 8.4 Conative Component of Attitude; 8.5 Conclusion; Chapter Nine; 9.1 Introduction