Cargando…
Realization of Substantive Law through Legal Proceedings.
Der Band enthält die Beiträge eines Symposiums, das entsprechend einer Tradition freundschaftlicher Verbundenheit der rechtswissenschaftlichen Fakultäten der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg und der Nagoya University vom 30. September- 01. Oktober 2015 über das Thema »Realization of Substant...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Otros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Tübingen :
Mohr Siebeck,
2017.
|
| Colección: | Veröffentlichungen zum Verfahrensrecht.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Cover; Preface; Table of Contents; Civil Procedure and Civil Law ; Alexander Bruns: Law Enforcement vs. Dispute Resolution. What is the Primary Purpose of Civil Procedure?; I. Import of the Purpose Doctrine; II. Basic Approaches; 1. Law Enforcement; a) Enforcement of Subjective Rights; b) Enforcement of Objective Legal Standards and Norms; c) Private Law Enforcement; 2. Dispute Resolution; 3. Concurring Ideas; a) Peace under the Law; b) Legal Certainty; c) Cultivation, Development and Creation of Legal Standards; d) Social Governance and Welfare; e) Efficient Resource Allocation.
- F) Procedural Protection of InterestsIII. Recommendable Determination of the Primary Purpose of Civil Procedure; IV. Summary; Miyuki Watanabe: Dispute Resolution and the Primary Purpose of Civil Procedure in Japan; I. Discussion on the Purpose of Civil Procedure in Japan; 1. Traditional Theories; 2. Pluralistic Theory
- Necessity of the Teleology of Civil Procedure?; 3. Procedural-Guaranty Theory; 4. New Protection-of-Rights Theory; II. Analysis of the Discussion; 1. Various Viewpoints; 2. Do the Theories Conflict?; III. Why the Teleology Exists?
- Private Dispute Resolution by the State.
- 1. Two Different Viewpoints
- Private but Official2. How do Courts Resolve Private Disputes?; IV. Subject Matter of Civil Procedure and Its Purpose; V. Relationship to the Constitution; 1. Traditional Arguments and Its Background; 2. The Constitution and the Purpose of Civil Procedure; VI. Difference between the Purpose of Civil Procedure and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR); Tomohiro Yoshimasa: Primary Purpose of Civil Procedure. A Perspective from the Japanese Civil Code; I. Introduction; II. Debate over "the Purpose of Civil Procedure" in Japan.
- 1. Traditional Theories on "the Purpose of Civil Procedure"2. More Recent Theories; 3. Limits of the Previous Debate; III. Case No. 1: Contracts for Work and the Owner of the Subject Matter of Work Performed; 1. The Problem: Ownership of the Building; 2. The Solution: Significance of the Ownership; IV. Case No. 2: Damages for the Defect in the Subject Matter of Work and the Right of the Contractor to Remuneration; 1. The Problem: Defect in the Subject Matter of Work and the Defense for Simultaneous Performance; 2. The Solution: Refusal of the Payment and the Negotiation of the Parties.
- v. Some General ObservationsPrivate International Law ; Jan von Hein: The Determination and Application of Foreign Law. A Blind Spot of European Private International Law?; I. Introduction; II. Application of PIL; 1. Mandatory or optional conflict-of-law rules for state courts; 2. Special conflict-of-law rules for arbitral tribunals; III. Determination and application of foreign law; 1. Determination of foreign law; a) Principles; b) Determination of foreign law in legal pra; c) Provisional, including protective, measures; 2. Leaving open the question of the applicable law.