Comparative constitutional reasoning /
A large-scale comparative work of leading cases examines judicial constitutional reasoning in eighteen different legal systems globally.
Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
---|---|
Otros Autores: | , , |
Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Cambridge :
Cambridge University Press,
2017.
|
Temas: | |
Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Cover; Half title; Title; Copyright; Contents; List of Contributors; Preface; Note on Online Materials; Introduction: Comparing Constitutional Reasoning with Quantitative and Qualitative Methods; 1 The High Court of Australia; 2 The Austrian Constitutional Court; 3 The Supreme Federal Tribunal of Brazil; 4 The Supreme Court of Canada; 5 The Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic; 6 The European Court of Human Rights; 7 The European Court of Justice; 8 The French Constitutional Council; 9 The German Federal Constitutional Court; 10 The Constitutional Court of Hungary.
- 11 The Supreme Court of Ireland12 The Israeli Supreme Court; 13 The Constitutional Court of Italy; 14 The Constitutional Court of South Africa; 15 The Spanish Constitutional Court; 16 The Constitutional Court of Taiwan; 17 The Supreme Court (House of Lords) of the United Kingdom; 18 The Supreme Court of the United States; Conclusion; Appendix; Index.