|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a2200000 i 4500 |
001 |
EBSCO_ocn974926489 |
003 |
OCoLC |
005 |
20231017213018.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr cnu---unuuu |
008 |
170309s2017 enk ob 001 0 eng d |
040 |
|
|
|a N$T
|b eng
|e rda
|e pn
|c N$T
|d YDX
|d EBLCP
|d MERUC
|d IDEBK
|d LGG
|d UAB
|d OTZ
|d MERER
|d OCLCA
|d OCLCQ
|d CUI
|d OCLCF
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d U3W
|d UEJ
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCA
|d UKAHL
|d OCLCQ
|d LUN
|d MM9
|d K6U
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|
019 |
|
|
|a 1170373885
|a 1171324725
|a 1172304718
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9781316838624
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|a 1316838625
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9781316823330
|
020 |
|
|
|a 1316823334
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9781316630822
|q (paperback)
|
020 |
|
|
|a 131663082X
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9781107177987
|
020 |
|
|
|z 1107177987
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a AU@
|b 000059722377
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a CHNEW
|b 000949673
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)974926489
|z (OCoLC)1170373885
|z (OCoLC)1171324725
|z (OCoLC)1172304718
|
043 |
|
|
|a n-cn---
|a e-gx---
|a f-sa---
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a K3367
|b .P48 2017eb
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a LAW
|x 018000
|2 bisacsh
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a LAW
|x 075000
|2 bisacsh
|
082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 342.08/5
|2 23
|
049 |
|
|
|a UAMI
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Petersen, Niels,
|e author.
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Proportionality and judicial activism :
|b fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa /
|c Niels Petersen, Professor of Public Law, International Law and EU Law, University of Münster, Faculty of Law.
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a Cambridge, United Kingdom ;
|a New York, NY, USA :
|b Cambridge University Press,
|c 2017.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
500 |
|
|
|a Based on the author's thesis (Habilitation - Universität, Bonn, 2012) issued under title: Verhältnismässigkeit als Rationalitätskontrolle : eine rechtsempirische Studie verfassungsrechtlicher Rechtsprechung zu den Freiheitsgrundrechten.
|
520 |
|
|
|a "The principle of proportionality is currently one of the most discussed topics in the field of comparative constitutional law. Many critics claim that courts use the proportionality test as an instrument of judicial self-empowerment. Proportionality and Judicial Activism tests this hypothesis empirically; it systematically and comparatively analyses the fundamental rights jurisprudence of the Canadian Supreme Court, the German Federal Constitutional Court and the South African Constitutional Court. The book shows that the proportionality test does give judges a considerable amount of discretion. However, this analytical openness does not necessarily lead to judicial activism. Instead, judges are faced with significant institutional constraints, as a result of which all three examined courts refrain from using proportionality for purposes of judicial activism"--
|c Provided by publisher
|
504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references and index.
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Introduction; 1. Judicial review and the correction of political market failures; 2. The normative debate on balancing; 3. Balancing and judicial legitimacy; 4. Proportionality as a doctrinal construction; 5. The avoidance of balancing; 6. Rationalising balancing; Conclusion: proportionality and the review of legislative rationality.
|
588 |
0 |
|
|a Print version record.
|
590 |
|
|
|a eBooks on EBSCOhost
|b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Political questions and judicial power
|z Canada.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Political questions and judicial power
|z Germany.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Political questions and judicial power
|z South Africa.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Proportionality in law
|z Canada.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Proportionality in law
|z Germany.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Proportionality in law
|z South Africa.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Courts of last resort
|z Canada.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Courts of last resort
|z Germany.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Courts of last resort
|z South Africa.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Politique et pouvoir judiciaire
|z Canada.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Politique et pouvoir judiciaire
|z Allemagne.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Politique et pouvoir judiciaire
|z Afrique du Sud.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Proportionnalité (Droit)
|z Canada.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Proportionnalité (Droit)
|z Allemagne.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Proportionnalité (Droit)
|z Afrique du Sud.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a LAW
|x Constitutional.
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a LAW
|x Public.
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Courts of last resort
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Political questions and judicial power
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Proportionality in law
|2 fast
|
651 |
|
7 |
|a Canada
|2 fast
|
651 |
|
7 |
|a Germany
|2 fast
|
651 |
|
7 |
|a South Africa
|2 fast
|
775 |
0 |
8 |
|i Revision of:
|a Petersen, Niels.
|t Verhältnismässigkeit als Rationalitätskontrolle.
|d Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 2015
|z 9783161535109
|
776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version:
|a Petersen, Niels.
|t Proportionality and judicial activism.
|d Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY, USA : Cambridge University Press, 2017
|z 9781107177987
|w (DLC) 2016058544
|w (OCoLC)962230767
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1475828
|z Texto completo
|
938 |
|
|
|a Askews and Holts Library Services
|b ASKH
|n AH33405220
|
938 |
|
|
|a Askews and Holts Library Services
|b ASKH
|n AH32509375
|
938 |
|
|
|a Askews and Holts Library Services
|b ASKH
|n AH32493037
|
938 |
|
|
|a ProQuest Ebook Central
|b EBLB
|n EBL4812334
|
938 |
|
|
|a EBSCOhost
|b EBSC
|n 1475828
|
938 |
|
|
|a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection
|b IDEB
|n cis37763665
|
938 |
|
|
|a YBP Library Services
|b YANK
|n 13669723
|
938 |
|
|
|a YBP Library Services
|b YANK
|n 13633988
|
938 |
|
|
|a YBP Library Services
|b YANK
|n 13972537
|
994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b IZTAP
|