Cargando…

Proportionality and judicial activism : fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa /

"The principle of proportionality is currently one of the most discussed topics in the field of comparative constitutional law. Many critics claim that courts use the proportionality test as an instrument of judicial self-empowerment. Proportionality and Judicial Activism tests this hypothesis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Petersen, Niels (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY, USA : Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 EBSCO_ocn974926489
003 OCoLC
005 20231017213018.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 170309s2017 enk ob 001 0 eng d
040 |a N$T  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c N$T  |d YDX  |d EBLCP  |d MERUC  |d IDEBK  |d LGG  |d UAB  |d OTZ  |d MERER  |d OCLCA  |d OCLCQ  |d CUI  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d U3W  |d UEJ  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCA  |d UKAHL  |d OCLCQ  |d LUN  |d MM9  |d K6U  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO 
019 |a 1170373885  |a 1171324725  |a 1172304718 
020 |a 9781316838624  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 1316838625  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 9781316823330 
020 |a 1316823334 
020 |a 9781316630822  |q (paperback) 
020 |a 131663082X 
020 |z 9781107177987 
020 |z 1107177987 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000059722377 
029 1 |a CHNEW  |b 000949673 
035 |a (OCoLC)974926489  |z (OCoLC)1170373885  |z (OCoLC)1171324725  |z (OCoLC)1172304718 
043 |a n-cn---  |a e-gx---  |a f-sa--- 
050 4 |a K3367  |b .P48 2017eb 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 018000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 075000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 342.08/5  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Petersen, Niels,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Proportionality and judicial activism :  |b fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa /  |c Niels Petersen, Professor of Public Law, International Law and EU Law, University of Münster, Faculty of Law. 
264 1 |a Cambridge, United Kingdom ;  |a New York, NY, USA :  |b Cambridge University Press,  |c 2017. 
300 |a 1 online resource 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Based on the author's thesis (Habilitation - Universität, Bonn, 2012) issued under title: Verhältnismässigkeit als Rationalitätskontrolle : eine rechtsempirische Studie verfassungsrechtlicher Rechtsprechung zu den Freiheitsgrundrechten. 
520 |a "The principle of proportionality is currently one of the most discussed topics in the field of comparative constitutional law. Many critics claim that courts use the proportionality test as an instrument of judicial self-empowerment. Proportionality and Judicial Activism tests this hypothesis empirically; it systematically and comparatively analyses the fundamental rights jurisprudence of the Canadian Supreme Court, the German Federal Constitutional Court and the South African Constitutional Court. The book shows that the proportionality test does give judges a considerable amount of discretion. However, this analytical openness does not necessarily lead to judicial activism. Instead, judges are faced with significant institutional constraints, as a result of which all three examined courts refrain from using proportionality for purposes of judicial activism"--  |c Provided by publisher 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
505 0 |a Introduction; 1. Judicial review and the correction of political market failures; 2. The normative debate on balancing; 3. Balancing and judicial legitimacy; 4. Proportionality as a doctrinal construction; 5. The avoidance of balancing; 6. Rationalising balancing; Conclusion: proportionality and the review of legislative rationality. 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
590 |a eBooks on EBSCOhost  |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide 
650 0 |a Political questions and judicial power  |z Canada. 
650 0 |a Political questions and judicial power  |z Germany. 
650 0 |a Political questions and judicial power  |z South Africa. 
650 0 |a Proportionality in law  |z Canada. 
650 0 |a Proportionality in law  |z Germany. 
650 0 |a Proportionality in law  |z South Africa. 
650 0 |a Courts of last resort  |z Canada. 
650 0 |a Courts of last resort  |z Germany. 
650 0 |a Courts of last resort  |z South Africa. 
650 6 |a Politique et pouvoir judiciaire  |z Canada. 
650 6 |a Politique et pouvoir judiciaire  |z Allemagne. 
650 6 |a Politique et pouvoir judiciaire  |z Afrique du Sud. 
650 6 |a Proportionnalité (Droit)  |z Canada. 
650 6 |a Proportionnalité (Droit)  |z Allemagne. 
650 6 |a Proportionnalité (Droit)  |z Afrique du Sud. 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Constitutional.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Public.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Courts of last resort  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Political questions and judicial power  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Proportionality in law  |2 fast 
651 7 |a Canada  |2 fast 
651 7 |a Germany  |2 fast 
651 7 |a South Africa  |2 fast 
775 0 8 |i Revision of:  |a Petersen, Niels.  |t Verhältnismässigkeit als Rationalitätskontrolle.  |d Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 2015  |z 9783161535109 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Petersen, Niels.  |t Proportionality and judicial activism.  |d Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY, USA : Cambridge University Press, 2017  |z 9781107177987  |w (DLC) 2016058544  |w (OCoLC)962230767 
856 4 0 |u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1475828  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH33405220 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH32509375 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH32493037 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL4812334 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 1475828 
938 |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection  |b IDEB  |n cis37763665 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 13669723 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 13633988 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 13972537 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP