FEDERAL RULEMAKING : notice issues and the good cause exception.
Introduction; Notice and Comment Rulemaking; Are There Actually Two Good Cause Standards?; What Constitutes Good Cause?; Emergencies; Congressional Intent; Harm Caused by Prior Notice; Standards of Review; Judicial Review of Agency Action; Review of Legal Conclusions; Review of Factual Determination...
Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
---|---|
Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
[Place of publication not identified] :
NOVA Science,
2017.
|
Colección: | Government procedures and operations.
|
Temas: | |
Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Preface; Chapter 1; A Brief Overview of Rulemaking and Judicial Review(; Summary; Introduction; Types of Rulemaking; Informal/Notice-and-Comment/ 553; Formal; Hybrid; Direct Final; Negotiated; Exceptions to the APA's 553 Rulemaking Requirements; Wholly Exempt; Exceptions to the Notice-and-Comment Procedures; Rules of Agency Organization, Procedure, or Practice; Non-legislative Rules; Good Cause; Exceptions to the 30-Day Delayed Effective Date; Judicial Review; End Notes; Chapter 2; The Good Cause Exception to Notice and Comment Rulemaking: Judicial Review of Agency Action).
- Federal Rulemaking: Agencies Could Take Additional Steps to Respond to Public Comments*Why GAO Did This Study; What GAO Recommends; What GAO Found; Abbreviations; Background; Agencies Issued about 35 Percent of Major Rules and about 44 Percent of Nonmajor Rules without an NPRM from 2003 to 2010; Agencies Most Often Invoked the Good Cause Exception When Publishing Rules without an NPRM; Good Cause Exception Commonly Used; Agencies' Use of Exceptions in Statutes Other than APA; Agencies' Use of APA's Broad Categorical Exceptions.
- When Agencies Publish Major Rules without an NPRM, They Often Provide Information on Economic Effects and Request Comments, But Do Not Always Respond to CommentsAgencies Provided Information on Economic Effects of Most Major Rules without an NPRM; Although Not Required, Agencies Often Requested Comments on Major Final Rules Issued without an NPRM, but Did Not Always Respond to Comments Received; Conclusion; Recommendation for Executive Action; Agency Comments and Our Evaluation; Appendix I: Scope and Methodology.
- Appendix II: Detailed Results of GAO Analyses of Final Rules Issued without an NPRM, 2003 through 2010Appendix III: Frequency of Interim Rulemaking, 2003 through 2010; Appendix IV: Summary Information on Final Major Rules Issued without an NPRM, in Whole or in Part-2003 through 2010; End Notes; End Notes for Appendix I; End Notes for Appendix III; Index.