Innovation and Reflexivity in the Research Process.

Mostrar otras versiones (1)

What makes the difference between excellent and mediocre research? The answer is scientific rigor and innovation based on creativity. For both, critical reflexivity is essential for delivering research with uniqueness, high quality and impact. However, reflexivity is generally not taught as a subjec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Jungmeister, Alexander
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: [Place of publication not identified] : Cambridge Scholars Publishing : Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2016.
Temas:
Critical thinking.
Research > Methodology.
Pensée critique.
Recherche > Méthodologie.
SOCIAL SCIENCE > Essays.
SOCIAL SCIENCE > Reference.
Critical thinking
Research > Methodology
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000003i 4500
001 EBSCO_ocn966288005
003 OCoLC
005 20231017213018.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu|||unuuu
008 161215s2016 xx ob 001 0 eng d
040 |a N$T  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c N$T  |d IDEBK  |d EBLCP  |d N$T  |d MERUC  |d UAB  |d OCLCQ  |d AGLDB  |d G3B  |d IGB  |d STF  |d TEF  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d AJS  |d ELBRO  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO 
020 |a 9781443849302  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 1443849308  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 9781443843775 
035 |a (OCoLC)966288005 
037 |a 4770270  |b Proquest Ebook Central 
050 4 |a H62 
072 7 |a SOC  |x 041000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a SOC  |x 023000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 300.72  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Jungmeister, Alexander. 
245 1 0 |a Innovation and Reflexivity in the Research Process. 
264 1 |a [Place of publication not identified] :  |b Cambridge Scholars Publishing :  |b Cambridge Scholars Publishing,  |c 2016. 
300 |a 1 online resource 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
588 0 |a Vendor-supplied metadata. 
505 0 |a Table of Contents; Introduction; Foreword; Chapter One; Chapter Two; Chapter Three; 3.1 Organisation; 3.2 Reflection Object; 3.3 Context and Objectives; 3.4 Perspectives; 3.5 Scenarios; 3.6 Process; 3.7 Results: Conclusions, Tests, Measures and Benefits; Chapter Four; 4.1 Singular or Intrapersonal Reflection; 4.2 Reflection in Small Groups/Teams; 4.3 Reflection in Large Groups; Chapter Five; Chapter Six; 6.1 Scientific Quality -- "Scientific Rigour"; 6.2 Quality Criterion Objectivity; 6.3 Quality Criterion Reliability; 6.4 Quality Criterion Validity 
505 8 |a 6.5 Quality Criterion Ethics and Freedom from Plagiarism6.6 Quality Criterion Innovation; 6.7 Quality Criterion Sources; 6.8 Quality Criteria for Scientific Publications; 6.9 Design Thinking; 6.10 Project Management; Chapter Seven; 7.1 Documentation of Results; 7.2 Structuring and Evaluating Results; 7.3 Testing and Verifying Results; 7.4 Measures/Decisions Derived from the Reflection; 7.5 Research Diaries; 7.6 Mind Maps; Chapter Eight; 8.1 General Techniques; 8.2 Legal Techniques; 8.3 Techniques for Social Sciences and Economics; Chapter Nine; 9.1 The Research Process at a Glance 
505 8 |a 9.2 Project Ideas/ Research Ideas9.3 Project Objectives; 9.4 Research Paradigms; 9.5 Research Questions; 9.6 Hypothesis Formation; 9.7 Literature Review; 9.8 Methodology; 9.9 Data Collection; 9.10 Data Verification; 9.11 Result Screening; 9.12 Publications; Chapter Ten; 10.1 Linearity and Non-Linearity; 10.2 Structured vs Unstructured Reflection; 10.3 Meta-Reflexivity; 10.4 Influence of Organisations and Stakeholders; 10.5 The Personality of the Researcher and the Research Group; 10.6 Self-Reflection; Chapter Eleven; 11.1 A Business Administration Research Project 
505 8 |a 11.2 A Legal Research ProjectChapter Twelve; 12.1 Results for the Research Process; 12.2 Increase Scientific Character of Research Results; 12.3 Contributions to Theory Formation; 12.4 Reflection and Innovation -- Innovative Results; 12.5 Increase Applicability of Research Results; 12.6 Emancipatory Aspects; 12.7 Empirical Results from Management; 12.8 Empirical Results from the Healthcare Sector; 12.9 Conclusion; Chapter Thirteen; 13.1 Subjectivity; 13.2 Privileged Knowledge; 13.3 Relativity; Chapter Fourteen; 14.1 Written Submissions -- "Peer Reviews"; 14.2 Involvement of Experts 
505 8 |a 14.3 (Research) Models and Checklists14.4 Quality Management and Quality Assurance; 14.5 Knowledge Management; 14.6 Triangulation; Chapter Fifteen; 15.1 Improvement of Research Results; 15.2 Validation of Results; 15.3 Reflection in the Multi-Method Context; Chapter Sixteen; Literature/References; Image Directory; List of Tables; Appendices; Glossary; Index 
520 |a What makes the difference between excellent and mediocre research? The answer is scientific rigor and innovation based on creativity. For both, critical reflexivity is essential for delivering research with uniqueness, high quality and impact. However, reflexivity is generally not taught as a subject in universities, and there are limited books exploring reflexivity in the research process. Addressing this gap, and designed for beginners, this book provides an accessible model on reflexivity for all its applications during the research process, from the first idea to the finished paper, book or. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
590 |a eBooks on EBSCOhost  |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide 
650 0 |a Critical thinking. 
650 0 |a Research  |x Methodology. 
650 6 |a Pensée critique. 
650 6 |a Recherche  |x Méthodologie. 
650 7 |a SOCIAL SCIENCE  |x Essays.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a SOCIAL SCIENCE  |x Reference.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Critical thinking  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Research  |x Methodology  |2 fast 
856 4 0 |u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1439264  |z Texto completo 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL4770270 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 1439264 
938 |a eLibro  |b ELBO  |n ELB147648 
938 |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection  |b IDEB  |n cis37229932 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP 

Ejemplares similares