Cargando…

Revisiting the concept of defence in the jus ad bellum : the dual face of defence /

A State should today have an explicitly recognized and undisputed right of delimited unilateral defense, not only in response to an occurring armed attack, but also in interception of an inevitable or imminent armed attack. This book, however, makes it evident that unilateral interception is not inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Friman, Johanna (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Oxford [UK] ; Portland, Oregon : Hart Publishing, 2017.
Colección:Studies in international law ; volume 66
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000008i 4500
001 EBSCO_ocn960642082
003 OCoLC
005 20231017213018.0
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 161011s2017 enk ob 001 0 eng
010 |a  2016046776 
040 |a DLC  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c DLC  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCF  |d N$T  |d IDEBK  |d OCLCQ  |d UAB  |d BLOOM  |d FIE  |d OTZ  |d OCLCQ  |d YDX  |d OCLCQ  |d NLE  |d OCLCQ  |d UKMGB  |d U3W  |d UKAHL  |d OCLCQ  |d LUN  |d OCLCQ  |d K6U  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d PSYSI  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO 
015 |a GBB858366  |2 bnb 
016 7 |a 018236962  |2 Uk 
019 |a 1167145500 
020 |a 9781509906956  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 1509906959  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 9781509906987 
020 |a 1509906983 
020 |a 1509906975 
020 |a 9781509906970 
020 |z 9781509906963 
020 |z 1509906967 
020 |z 9781509906970  |q (hardback ;  |q alk. paper) 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000061055337 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000062352870 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000062543410 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000065052058 
029 1 |a UKMGB  |b 018236962 
035 |a (OCoLC)960642082  |z (OCoLC)1167145500 
037 |a 9781509906963  |b CodeMantra 
042 |a pcc 
050 1 0 |a KZ6396 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 051000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 0 |a 341.6/3  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Friman, Johanna,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Revisiting the concept of defence in the jus ad bellum :  |b the dual face of defence /  |c Johanna Friman. 
246 3 |a Revisiting the concept of defense in the jus ad bellum 
263 |a 1704 
264 1 |a Oxford [UK] ;  |a Portland, Oregon :  |b Hart Publishing,  |c 2017. 
300 |a 1 online resource 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 0 |a Studies in international law ;  |v volume 66 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
505 0 |a The faces of war -- The first face of defence : self-defence -- The second face of defence : necessity-defence -- Whitherward warfare? 
588 0 |a Print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed. 
520 |a A State should today have an explicitly recognized and undisputed right of delimited unilateral defense, not only in response to an occurring armed attack, but also in interception of an inevitable or imminent armed attack. This book, however, makes it evident that unilateral interception is not incontestably compatible with the modern right of self-defence in Article 51 of the UN Charter. Then again, unilateral defense need not forever be confined to self-defence only, wherefore the book proposes that the concept of defense may best be modernized by a clear legal division into responsive and interceptive defense. Since both threat and use of force are explicitly prohibited in Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, the book further recommends that both responsive and interceptive defense should be explicitly excepted from this prohibition in Article 51 of the UN Charter. The modern jus ad bellum should thus legally recognize a dual face of defense: responsive self-defense if an armed attack occurs, and interceptive necessity-defense if a grave and urgent threat of an armed attack occurs. Because without a clarifying and modernizing revision, the concept of defense will become irreparably blurred until ultimately completely dissolved into the ever shifting sands of war. 
590 |a eBooks on EBSCOhost  |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide 
650 0 |a Just war doctrine. 
650 0 |a War (International law) 
650 0 |a Self-defense (Law) 
650 6 |a Guerre juste. 
650 6 |a Guerre (Droit international) 
650 6 |a Légitime défense. 
650 7 |a International law.  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a LAW  |x International.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Just war doctrine  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Self-defense (Law)  |2 fast 
650 7 |a War (International law)  |2 fast 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Friman, Johanna.  |t Revisiting the concept of defence in the jus ad bellum.  |d Oxford [UK] ; Portland, Oregon : Hart Publishing, 2017  |z 9781509906970  |w (DLC) 2016046246 
856 4 0 |u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1466593  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH32442275 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH32442274 
938 |a Bloomsbury Publishing  |b BLOO  |n bpp09260647 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 1466593 
938 |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection  |b IDEB  |n cis36115979 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 13503003 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP