Cargando…
Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition : Ibn Qutlubugha's commentary on the compendium of Quduri /
In Rule-Formulation and Binding Precedent in the Madhhab-Law Tradition , Talal Al-Azem argues for the existence of a madhhab -law tradition' of jurisprudence underpinning the four post-classical Sunni schools of law. This tradition celebrated polyvalence by preserving the multiplicity of confli...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Leiden ; Boston :
Brill,
[2017]
|
| Colección: | Islamicate intellectual history.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Contents; Preface; List of Figures; Transliteration, Dates, and Abbreviations; Introduction; Chapter 1. Authors; 1. The Compendium Author: Qudūrī; 1.1. The Sunni Revival and the Probabilism of the Madhhab-Law Tradition; 2. The Commentator: Ibn Quṭlūbughā; 2.1. Madhhab Literary Tradition and Mamluk Legal Pluralism; Chapter 2. History; 1. Ibn Quṭlūbughā's Sources; 2. Periodisation; 2.1. Period 1: Foundational 'Ḥanafī' Opinions (ca. 150-200) [5 Jurists]; 2.2. Period 2: Formative Transmission (ca. 200-300) [12 Jurists, 29 References]
- 2.3. Period 3: Classical Consolidation (ca. 300-400) [11 Jurists, 109 References]2.4. Period 4: Tarjīḥ (ca. 400-650) [48 Jurists, 1,090 References]; 2.5. Period 5: Taṣḥīḥ (ca. 650-870) [19 Jurists, 900 References]; 2.6. Who are the 'Latter-Day Jurists' (al-mutaʼakhkhirūn)?; 3. Historical Geographical Patterns; 4. Periodisation and the Typologies of Jurists (ṭabaqāt al-fuqahāʼ); Chapter 3. Theory; 1. Ibn Quṭlūbughā's Introduction to al-Taṣḥīḥ wa-al-tarjīḥ; 2. Analysis of the Topics; 2.1. Definitions; 2.2. The Procedures of Rule-Determinacy; 2.3. Judicial Discretion
- 3. Arguments for Binding Precedent3.1. The Ethico-Religious Argument; 3.2. The Argument from Legal-System Consistency; 3.3. The Argument from Legal-System Coherence; 3.4. The Argument from Strengthened Decision-Making; 3.5. The Argument from Predictability; 3.6. The Argument from Historical Determinism; 4. Historical Developments; 4.1. Target Audiences: Muftis and Muftis; 4.2. Rule-Formulation (tarjīḥ) vs. Rule-Review (taṣḥīḥ); 4.3. From Monist to Pluralistic Legal Systems; 4.4. Madhhab-Law: Tradition, System, Concurrent Jurisdictions
- 5. The (Lack of) Definition of ẓāhir al-riwāyaChapter 4. Practice; 1. Ibn Quṭlūbughā's Practice of Rule-Review; 2. The Functional Relationships of Commentary; 2.1. To Resolve a Juristic Dispute [406]; 2.2. To Clarify a Point of Ambiguity [149]; 2.3. To Identify the Opinion or the Transmission Used in the Rule-Formulation [185]; 2.4. To Further Expand upon the Passage [420]; 2.5. To Identify an Editorial Problem in the Passage Itself [25]; 3. Employed Legal Rhetorical Reasoning; 3.1. Arguments of Juristic Evidence (dalīl); 3.2. Arguments of Transmission (riwāya)
- 3.3. Arguments of Language and Logic3.4. Arguments from Revelation and the Early Muslim Community; 3.5. Arguments from Scholarship; 3.6. Justifications from Juristic Considerations; 3.7. Justifications from Context; 3.8. Justifications from Exigencies of Change and Necessity; 3.9. Justifications of Lifting Difficulty and Facilitating Ease; 3.10. Justifications of Preceding Juristic Authority; 4. Operative Principles of Rule-Determination; 5. The Degree of Congruence between Theory and Practice; Conclusion; Appendix 1. The Writings of Qudūrī