Cargando…
The right to freedom of assembly : a comparative study /
In legal decisions and commentary, freedom of assembly is widely cherished as a precious human right and as indispensable for the preservation of democratic governance. But despite this rhetoric assemblies are subject to extensive regulation, such as prior restraints, and restrictions on the time, p...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Oxford :
Hart Publishing,
2015.
|
| Colección: | Hart studies in comparative public law ;
v. 6. |
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Cover; Half-title; Title; Copyright; Acknowledgements; Contents; Introduction; I. The Challenge of Freedom of Assembly; II. A Concept of Assembly; III. Structure; Chapter 1: Origins, Forms and Values; I. Historical Origins of the Right to Freedom of Assembly; II. Meeting, Marching or Speaking: Forms of Assembly; A. United Kingdom: Stationary and Moving Assemblies; B. France: Réunion and Manifestation; C. United States: Expressivity Discounted by 'Forum' and 'Action'; D. The European Court of Human Rights: Subsidiarity and Functionality; E. Germany: Assembly and Demonstration.
- I. Narrow, Enlarged or Wide Notion of Assemblyii. Demonstration and the Relation Between Freedom of Assembly and Freedom of Opinion; III. Fundamental Right, or 'Mere' Common Law Liberty; IV. The Value of Freedom of Assembly: Contemporary Judicial Rationales; A. Expression-related Values; B. Democracy-related Values; i. 'Inherent in the Form of Republican Government'; ii. 'A Moment of Original, Untamed, Direct Democracy'; iii. 'Formation of Political Will and Opinion in a Representative Democracy'-Stabilising Role?; iv. 'Essential to the Poorly Financed Causes of Little People'
- v. Self-governance and Democracy Arguments in Free Speech Jurisprudence Applied to AssembliesC. The Value of Liberty; Chapter 2: Prior Restraints, Exemptions and Bargain; I. Prior Restraint in General; II. Advance Notice or Permit; A. United States: Proprietary Theory, Fight Against Vagueness and the Turn to Content-neutrality; i. Governmental Property versus Vagueness; ii. From Non-discrimination to Content-neutrality: How Prior Restraint Becomes Content-neutral Injunction; B. Germany: Only Notice and Strict Proportionality; C. United Kingdom: Notice Only for Processions.
- D. France: Notice Only for ManifestationsE. European Court of Human Rights: Both Permit and Notice in Theory Acceptable; III. Prior Ban and Conditions; A. United States: No Special Doctrinal Rules; B. United Kingdom: Vague Conditions, Prohibited Zone, Loose Review and the Human Rights Act; C. France: Substantive Values as Troubles to Public Order and Proportionality; D. Germany: Graduality of Cooperation, Conditions and Ban; E. European Court of Human Rights: Strong Substantive and Procedural Protection; IV. Exemptions, Derogations from the Notification Requirement.
- A. Traditional Processions: Content Discrimination or a Reasonable Exception?B. Spontaneous and 'Urgent' Assemblies; Chapter 3: From Violence to Public Disorder to Crime Prevention; I. The Peacefulness Requirement: A Determinant of Scope or a Limit; A. Germany: Peaceful and Without Arms; B. United States: No Ban on Guns; C. United Kingdom: Not a Thematised Separate Question; D. France: Attroupement and Group Violence; E. European Court of Human Rights: Systematic, Intentional Violence; II. The Would-be Disorderly: Judicial Doctrines of Risk-assessment; A. Differently Dangerous Demonstrators.