Marcan priority without Q : explorations in the Farrer hypothesis /
This book discusses the composition of the synoptic gospels from the perspective of the Farrer hypothesis, a view that posits that Mark was written first, that Matthew used Mark as a source, and that Luke used both Mark and Matthew. All of the articles in the volume are written in support of the Far...
Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
---|---|
Otros Autores: | , |
Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
London :
Bloomsbury T & T Clark,
2015.
|
Colección: | Library of New Testament studies ;
455. |
Temas: | |
Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- List of Contributors; Acknowlegments; Abbreviations; INTRODUCTION: WHY THE FARRER HYPOTHESIS? WHY NOW?
- John C. Poirier; Chapter 1
- THE DEVIL IN THE DETAIL: EXORCISING Q FROM THE BEELZEBUL CONTROVERSY
- Eric Eve; Chapter 2
- PROBLEMS WITH THE NON-AVERSION PRINCIPLE FOR RECONSTRUCTING Q
- Stephen C. Carlson; Chapter 3
- CRANK OR CREATIVE GENIUS? HOW ANCIENT RHETORIC MAKES SENSE OF LUKE'S ORDER
- Heather M. Gorman; Chapter 4
- TOO GOOD TO BE Q: HIGH VERBATIM AGREEMENT IN THE DOUBLE TRADITION
- Mark Goodacre.
- Chapter 5
- LUKE 11.2-4: THE LORD'S PRAYER (ABRIDGED EDITION)
- Ken OlsonChapter 6
- A STATISTICAL TIME SERIES APPROACH TO THE USE OF MARK BY MATTHEW AND LUKE
- Andris Abakuks; Chapter 7
- MATTHEW'S ENDING AND THE GENESIS OF LUKE-ACTS: THE FARRER HYPOTHESIS AND THE BIRTH OF CHRISTIAN HISTORY
- Jeffrey Peterson; Chapter 8
- RECONSIDERING THE DATE OF LUKE IN LIGHTOF THE FARRER HYPOTHESIS
- David Landry; Chapter 9
- DELBERT BURKETT'S DEFENSE OF Q
- John C. Poirier; Chapter 10
- THE FARRER/MARK WITHOUT Q HYPOTHESIS: A RESPONSE
- John S. Kloppenborg; Bibliography; Index of References.