Costs and contributions to support the U.S. military presence overseas : inquiry and analyses /

The United States spends more than 10 billion a year to support our permanent military presence overseas. That does not include military personnel costs or spending to support the war in Afghanistan. Nearly 70 percent of that 10 billion is spent in Germany, the Republic of Korea, and Japan. The fact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Otros Autores: Hudson, Loretta (Editor )
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: New York : Nova Science Publishers, [2014]
Colección:Military and veteran issues.
Temas:
United States. > Department of Defense
Military bases, American > Foreign countries.
Military bases, American > Costs.
Bases militaires américaines > Pays étrangers.
Bases militaires américaines > Coût.
HISTORY > Military > Other.
TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING > Military Science.
Military bases, American > Costs
Armed Forces > Foreign service
Armed Forces > Appropriations and expenditures
Expenditures, Public
United States > Armed Forces > Foreign service.
United States
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • COSTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS TO SUPPORT THE U.S. MILITARY PRESENCE OVERSEAS: INQUIRY AND ANALYSES; COSTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS TO SUPPORT THE U.S. MILITARY PRESENCE OVERSEAS: INQUIRY AND ANALYSES; Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data; CONTENTS; PREFACE; Chapter 1: INQUIRY INTO U.S. COSTS AND ALLIED CONTRIBUTIONS TO SUPPORT THE U.S. MILITARY PRESENCE OVERSEAS; EXECUTIVE SUMMARY; CONCLUSIONS OF THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE; INTRODUCTION; I. RESIDUAL VALUE COMPENSATION IN GERMANY; II. COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE U.S. MILITARY PRESENCE IN THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH KOREA.
  • III. COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE U.S. MILITARY PRESENCE IN JAPANCOMMITTEE ACTION; Chapter 2: DEFENSE MANAGEMENT: COMPREHENSIVE COST INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES NEEDED TO ASSESS MILITARY POSTURE IN ASIA; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO RECOMMENDS; WHAT GAO FOUND; ABBREVIATIONS; BACKGROUND; DOD HAS NOT FULLY ESTIMATED THE COST OF POSTURE INITIATIVES IN SOUTH KOREA OR PROVIDED AN ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES TO TOUR NORMALIZATION; DOD HAS NOT ESTIMATED THE COST OF POSTURE INITIATIVES IN JAPAN AND GUAM; DOD LACKS COMPREHENSIVE COST INFORMATION NEEDED FOR AFFORDABILITY ANALYSIS; CONCLUSION.
  • RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTIONAGENCY COMMENTS AND OUR EVALUATION; APPENDIX I: SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY; APPENDIX II: COMMITTEE REPORTING DIRECTION CONTAINED IN SENATE REPORT 111-226 (S. REP. NO. 111-226, AT 13-15 (2010)); APPENDIX III. ADDITIONAL PACOM COST AND FUNDING DATA; Chapter 3: DEFENSE MANAGEMENT: ADDITIONAL COST INFORMATION AND STAKEHOLDER INPUT NEEDED TO ASSESS MILITARY POSTURE IN EUROPE; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO RECOMMENDS; WHAT GAO FOUND; BACKGROUND; DOD GUIDANCE DOES NOT REQUIRE EUCOM TO ESTIMATE OR REPORT THE TOTAL COST OF POSTURE.
  • Eucom lacks a systematic process to evaluate posture alternatives and routinely incorporate interagency views in posture planningconclusion; recommendations for executive action; agency comments and our evaluation; appendix i. scope and methodology; appendix ii. total cost of dod's installations in eucom's area of responsibility; index.

Ejemplares similares