|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a2200000 i 4500 |
001 |
EBSCO_ocn885208521 |
003 |
OCoLC |
005 |
20231017213018.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr cnu---unuuu |
008 |
140804s2014 enk ob 001 0 eng d |
040 |
|
|
|a N$T
|b eng
|e rda
|e pn
|c N$T
|d IDEBK
|d YDXCP
|d E7B
|d CDX
|d ILI
|d OCLCF
|d EBLCP
|d OCLCQ
|d UAB
|d OCLCQ
|d INT
|d AU@
|d OCLCQ
|d JBG
|d DKC
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d K6U
|d OCLCQ
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9780199362141
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|a 0199362149
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9780199362134
|
020 |
|
|
|z 0199362130
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a AU@
|b 000056004731
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a CHNEW
|b 000667459
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a CHNEW
|b 000687944
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a CHNEW
|b 000687945
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a NLGGC
|b 380190214
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)885208521
|
037 |
|
|
|a 1745409
|b Proquest Ebook Central
|
043 |
|
|
|a n-us---
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a KF425
|b .K38 2014eb
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a LAW
|x 001000
|2 bisacsh
|
082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 349.73
|2 23
|
049 |
|
|
|a UAMI
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Katzmann, Robert A.,
|e author.
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Judging statutes /
|c Robert A. Katzmann.
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a Oxford :
|b Oxford University Press,
|c 2014.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Congress and the lawmaking process -- Congress and agencies : interpreting and implementing statutes -- Judicial interpretation of statutes -- Some cases I have decided -- Promoting understanding.
|
588 |
0 |
|
|a Print version record.
|
504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references and index.
|
520 |
|
|
|a In an ideal world, the laws of Congress-known as federal statutes-would always be clearly worded and easily understood by the judges tasked with interpreting them. But many laws feature ambiguous or even contradictory wording. How, then, should judges divine their meaning? Should they stick only to the text? To what degree, if any, should they consult aids beyond the statutes themselves? Are the purposes of lawmakers in writing law relevant? Some judges, such as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, believe courts should look to the language of the statute and virtually nothing else. Chief Jud.
|
590 |
|
|
|a eBooks on EBSCOhost
|b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Law
|z United States
|x Interpretation and construction.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Legislative bodies
|z United States.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Judicial process
|z United States.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Statutes
|z United States.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Droit
|z États-Unis
|x Interprétation.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Processus judiciaire
|z États-Unis.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Statuts
|z États-Unis.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a LAW
|x Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice.
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Judicial process.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst00984705
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Law
|x Interpretation and construction.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst00993756
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Legislative bodies.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst00995690
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Statutes.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst01132185
|
651 |
|
7 |
|a United States.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst01204155
|
776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version:
|a Katzmann, Robert A.
|t Judging statutes
|z 9780199362134
|w (DLC) 2014003481
|w (OCoLC)869552511
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=818400
|z Texto completo
|
938 |
|
|
|a Coutts Information Services
|b COUT
|n 28796494
|
938 |
|
|
|a ProQuest Ebook Central
|b EBLB
|n EBL1745409
|
938 |
|
|
|a ebrary
|b EBRY
|n ebr10900839
|
938 |
|
|
|a EBSCOhost
|b EBSC
|n 818400
|
938 |
|
|
|a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection
|b IDEB
|n cis28796494
|
938 |
|
|
|a YBP Library Services
|b YANK
|n 12009362
|
938 |
|
|
|a YBP Library Services
|b YANK
|n 12325642
|
994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b IZTAP
|