Cargando…

Mercy : a restorative philosophy /

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Cornwell, David J. (Autor)
Otros Autores: Lappi-Seppälä, Tapio (writer of foreword.)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Hook, Hampshire, United Kingdom : Waterside Press, [2014]
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Cover
  • Copyright and publication details
  • Contents
  • Dedication
  • Acknowledgements
  • About the Author
  • The author of the Foreword
  • Foreword
  • Introduction
  • An Uncertain Point of Departure
  • The Context of this Book
  • The Middle-Ages in Western Europeâ€?â€?â€?Justice in Transition
  • The Later 20th-Century: The Need for a Different Justice Paradigm
  • The Penological Vacuum and the Naissance of Restorative Justice
  • The Need for Definition
  • Justice Defined
  • Its Relationship with Equity
  • The Place of Mitigation
  • The Characteristics of MercyThe Extraordinary Case of Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi
  • The Ensuing Debateâ€?â€?â€?The Opinion of Professor Anthony Duff
  • Professor Lindsay Farmerâ€?s Response to Duff
  • Duffâ€?s Response to Lindsay Farmer
  • Why is the Debate about Mercy so Important?
  • Mercy and the Punitive Legacy
  • Background Considerations
  • â€?Populist Punitivismâ€? and Penal Instrumentalism
  • The Moral Credibility of the Law and the Place of Mercy
  • Alwynne Smart on â€?Mercyâ€?: Clarification or Confusion?
  • â€?Institutionalisingâ€? Mercy
  • Mercy and Retributive Penology: Incompatible Bedfellows?Towards an Institutionalised Form of Mercy
  • Desert of Punishment
  • Desert of Mercy
  • Bifurcated Criminal Justice
  • Conceiving Corrections Differently
  • Objections to Bifurcated Penal Policies
  • Politics and Public Opinion
  • Reparative Sanctions and Victim-Offender Mediation
  • Victims of Criminal Justice?
  • The nature of the debate
  • The Approach of Cavadino and Dignan (1997)
  • Victim Status: The Need for Caution
  • The Objections of Andrew Ashworth (1992 and 1993)
  • Victimsâ€? Rights: Myth or Reality?The Victimâ€?s Charter 1990 and Onwards
  • Exploring Victimsâ€? Rights
  • The Unique Status of Victims of Crime
  • The Nature of Rights
  • Victimsâ€? Rights: A â€?First Principleâ€? Approach
  • Rights and Responsibilities
  • Victim Inclusiveness and Stakeholder Status
  • â€?Fault- Linesâ€? and Fallacies
  • The Need to Re-Configure Criminal Justice
  • â€?Fault-linesâ€? within Contemporary Criminal Justice Philosophy
  • Crime Control or Crime Reduction
  • Traditionalism
  • Separation of Powers
  • The Uses of Imprisonment
  • The Structure of Correctional ServicesFallacies within Contemporary Criminal Justice Philosophy
  • Retribution versus Restoration
  • Mercy has no Place within Criminal Justice
  • Bifurcated Justice as Injustice
  • Reduced Use of Imprisonment Increases Public Risk
  • A Political and Social Consensus for Penal Reform is Impossible to Achieve
  • Mercy and Restorative Justice
  • Why Restorative Justice Remains Problematic
  • Is a â€?Core Philosophyâ€? of Restorative Justice Essential?
  • Is There a Need to Re-evaluate Restorative Justice and Mercy?