Cargando…
Proportionality and the Rule of Law : Rights, Justification, Reasoning /
"To speak of human rights is to speak of proportionality. It is no exaggeration to claim that proportionality has overtaken rights as the orienting idea in contemporary human rights law and scholarship. Proportionality has been received into the constitutional doctrine of courts in continental...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | , , |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
New York :
Cambridge University Press,
2014.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | EBSCO_ocn879202707 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20231017213018.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr cnu---unuuu | ||
| 008 | 140505s2014 nyu ob 001 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a N$T |b eng |e rda |e pn |c N$T |d EBLCP |d YDXCP |d E7B |d CAMBR |d OCLCF |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d QGK |d OCLCQ |d DEBSZ |d OCLCQ |d YDX |d Z5A |d BUF |d UEJ |d UAB |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d FIE |d AU@ |d UKAHL |d OCLCQ |d K6U |d OCLCA |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ | ||
| 019 | |a 957614575 |a 960715892 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781139958202 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1139958208 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9781107565272 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1107565278 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9781139960311 | ||
| 020 | |a 1139960318 | ||
| 020 | |a 1139950746 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9781139950749 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9781139959254 | ||
| 020 | |a 1139959255 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781107064072 | ||
| 020 | |z 1107064074 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781107647954 | ||
| 020 | |z 1107647959 | ||
| 029 | 1 | |a CHNEW |b 000697306 | |
| 029 | 1 | |a DEBSZ |b 449421740 | |
| 029 | 1 | |a NLGGC |b 375343318 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)879202707 |z (OCoLC)957614575 |z (OCoLC)960715892 | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a K247 |b .P79 2014eb | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 101000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 044000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 052000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 071000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 098000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 079000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 340/.11 |2 23 |
| 084 | |a LAW052000 |2 bisacsh | ||
| 049 | |a UAMI | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Proportionality and the Rule of Law : |b Rights, Justification, Reasoning / |c edited by Grant Huscroft, Western University, Canada ; Bradley W. Miller, Western University, Canada ; Grégoire Webber, London School of Economics. |
| 264 | 1 | |a New York : |b Cambridge University Press, |c 2014. | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (ix, 421 pages) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a "To speak of human rights is to speak of proportionality. It is no exaggeration to claim that proportionality has overtaken rights as the orienting idea in contemporary human rights law and scholarship. Proportionality has been received into the constitutional doctrine of courts in continental Europe, the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand, Israel, and South Africa, as well as the jurisprudence of treaty-based legal systems like the European Court of Human Rights, giving rise to claims of a global model, a received approach, or, simply, the best-practice standard of rights adjudication. Even in the United States, which is widely understood to have formally rejected proportionality, some argue that the various levels of scrutiny adopted by the US Supreme Court are analogous to the standard questions posed by proportionality. As proportionality scholars are well aware, some of the early literature on balancing and rights is American, with special reference to the First Amendment. Notwithstanding proportionality's popularity, there is no consensus on its methodology. Much less does the use of a proportionality doctrine guarantee consensus on substantive rights questions. What the principle of proportionality promises is a common analytical framework, a framework the significance of which is not in its ubiquity (a mere fact), but because its structure influences (some would say controls) how courts reason to conclusions in many of the great moral and political questions confronting political communities. As a framework, proportionality analysis is superficially straightforward, setting out four questions in evaluating whether the limitation of a right is justifiable. A serviceable - but by no means canonical"-- |c Provided by publisher | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 505 | 0 | |a Introduction / Grant Huscroft, Bradley W. Miller and Grégoire Webber -- The lost meaning of proportionality / Martin Luterán -- Proportionality is dead : long live proportionality! / Alison L. Young -- Human dignity and proportionality : deontic pluralism in balancing / Mattias Kumm and Alec D. Walen -- Between reason and strategy : some reflections on the normativity of proportionality / George Pavlakos -- On the loss of rights / Grégoire Webber -- Proportionality and rights inflation / Kai Möller -- Proportionality and the question of weight / Frederick Schauer -- Proportionality and the relevance of interpretation / Grant Huscroft -- Democracy, legality and proportionality / T.R.S. Allan -- Proportionality and deference in a culture of justification / David Dyzenhaus -- Proportionality and democratic constitutionalism / Stephen Gardbaum -- The rationalism of proportionality's culture of justification / Mark Antaki -- Proportionality and incommensurability / Timothy Endicott -- Legislating proportionately / Richard Ekins -- Proportionality's blind spot : 'neutrality' and political philosophy / Bradley W. Miller -- Mapping the American debate over balancing / Iddo Porat. | |
| 590 | |a eBooks on EBSCOhost |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Proportionality in law. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Human rights. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Rule of law. | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Human Rights | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Proportionnalité (Droit) | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Droits de l'homme (Droit international) | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Règle de droit. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Jurisprudence. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Essays. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x General Practice. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Paralegals & Paralegalism. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Practical Guides. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Reference. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Human rights. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst00963285 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Proportionality in law. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst01079251 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rule of law. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst01101218 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Menschenrecht |2 gnd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rechtsstaatsprinzip |2 gnd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz |2 gnd | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Huscroft, Grant, |e editor. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Miller, Bradley W. |q (Bradley Wayne), |d 1968- |e editor. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Webber, Grégoire C. N. |q (Grégoire Charles N.), |e editor. | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |t Proportionality and the rule of law |z 9781107064072 |w (DLC) 2013044707 |w (OCoLC)862401019 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=761504 |z Texto completo |
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH33401873 | ||
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH26386316 | ||
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH26272139 | ||
| 938 | |a EBL - Ebook Library |b EBLB |n EBL1658790 | ||
| 938 | |a ebrary |b EBRY |n ebr10868090 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 761504 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 11811262 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 11801511 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 11804597 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 11859480 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b IZTAP | ||