Professional ethics at the international bar /

Annotation

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Sarvarian, Arman (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2013.
Edición:First edition.
Colección:International courts and tribunals series.
Temas:
Legal ethics.
International courts.
Procedure (Law)
Tribunaux internationaux.
Procédure (Droit)
BUSINESS & ECONOMICS > Business Ethics.
International courts
Legal ethics
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Machine generated contents note: 1. The Role of Counsel Ethics in International Litigation
  • 1.1. The Function of the International Judicial System
  • 1.2. The Role of Professional Advocacy in International Litigation
  • 1.2.1. Professionalism
  • 1.2.2. Professionalization
  • 1.2.3. Fundamental Ethical Duties
  • 1.3. Arguments for the Professionalization of Advocacy
  • 1.3.1. Solving Practical Problems
  • 1.3.2. Enhancing the Image of International Courts
  • 1.3.3. Stages of Professionalization
  • 1.4. Arguments against the Professionalization of Advocacy
  • 1.4.1.Common Ethical Standards are Impossible
  • 1.4.2. Enforcement is Impracticable
  • 1.4.3. Professionalization would Infringe Sovereignty
  • 1.5. Conclusions
  • 2. The Historical Development of National Ethical Traditions
  • 2.1. European Traditions
  • 2.1.1. Historical Background
  • 2.1.2. France
  • 2.1.3. England and Wales
  • 2.2. The American Tradition
  • 2.2.1. Historical Development
  • 2.2.2. Ethical Standards.
  • Contents note continued: 2.2.3. Ethical Efficacy
  • 2.3. Asian Traditions
  • 2.3.1. China
  • 2.3.2. Japan
  • 2.4. Islamic Traditions of the Near East
  • 2.4.1. Saudi Arabia
  • 2.4.2. Iran
  • 2.5. Conclusions
  • 3. The Historical Development of International Advocacy
  • 3.1. Ancient: and Classical Arbitration
  • 3.1.1. Antiquity
  • 3.1.2. Middle Ages
  • 3.1.3. Early Modern Age
  • 3.2. The Permanent Court of Arbitration
  • 3.3. The Permanent Court of International Justice
  • 3.3.1. The Creation of the PCIJ
  • 3.3.2. Statute
  • 3.3.3. Rules of Procedure
  • 3.3.4. Calls for an International Bar
  • 3.4. Conclusions
  • 4. The International Court of Justice
  • 4.1. Historical Background
  • 4.2. Admission Requirements
  • 4.2.1. Agents
  • 4.2.2. Membership of a National Bar
  • 4.2.3. Academic Lawyers
  • 4.2.4. Experts
  • 4.2.5. Legal Aid
  • 4.3. Ethical Standards
  • 4.3.1. Duties to the Client
  • 4.3.2. Duties to the Court
  • 4.4. Disciplinary Jurisdiction
  • 4.5. Conclusions
  • 5. The European Court of Justice.
  • Contents note continued: 5.1. Historical Background
  • 5.2. Admission Requirements
  • 5.2.1. Agents
  • 5.2.2. Lawyers
  • 5.2.3. Employed Lawyers
  • 5.2.4. Experts
  • 5.3. Ethical Standards
  • 5.3.1. Duties to the Client
  • 5.3.2. Duties to the Court
  • 5.3.3. Duties to Colleagues
  • 5.4. Disciplinary Jurisdiction
  • 5.5. Conclusions
  • 6. The European Court of Human Rights
  • 6.1. Historical Background
  • 6.2. Admission Requirements
  • 6.3. Ethical Standards
  • 6.3.1. Duties to the Client
  • 6.3.2. Duties to the Court
  • 6.3.3. Duties to Colleagues
  • 6.4. Disciplinary Jurisdiction
  • 6.5. Conclusions
  • 7. Investment Arbitration
  • 7.1. Historical Background
  • 7.2. Admission Requirements
  • 7.3. Ethical Standards
  • 7.3.1. Duties to the Client
  • 7.3.2. Duties to the Tribunal
  • 7.3.3. Duties to Colleagues
  • 7.4. Disciplinary Jurisdiction
  • 7.5. Conclusions
  • 8. The International Criminal Court
  • 8.1. Historical Background
  • 8.1.1. Nuremberg
  • 8.1.2. ICTY
  • 8.2. Admission Requirements.
  • Contents note continued: 8.2.1. Prosecutors
  • 8.2.2. Defence Counsel
  • 8.3. Ethical Standards
  • 8.3.1. Prosecutors
  • 8.3.2. Defence Counsel
  • 8.4. Disciplinary Jurisdiction
  • 8.4.1. Prosecutors
  • 8.4.2. Defence Counsel
  • 8.4.3. Double Deontology
  • 8.5. Conclusions
  • 9. Developing Common Ethical Standards before International Courts
  • 9.1. Regulatory Jurisdiction of International Courts
  • 9.1.1. Powers to Regulate Counsel
  • 9.1.2. Practical Ability to Regulate Counsel
  • 9.2. Articulation of Common Ethical Standards
  • 9.2.1. ILA Hague Principles
  • 9.2.2. IBA Guidelines
  • 9.2.3. CCBE
  • 9.3. Conclusions
  • 10. Towards an International Bar
  • 10.1. Centralization of Regulatory Authority
  • 10.2. National Enforcement of Ethical Standards
  • 10.3. International Bar Authority
  • 10.3.1. Bar Admission
  • 10.3.2. Code of Conduct
  • 10.3.3. Standing Disciplinary Panel
  • 10.4. Consequences of Professionalization
  • 10.4.1. Procedural Integrity
  • 10.4.2. Counsel Independence.
  • Contents note continued: 10.4.3. Party Control over Case Presentation
  • 10.4.4. Exclusion of Non-Professionals
  • 10.4.5. Formation of a Collective Bar
  • 10.5. Conclusions.

Ejemplares similares